Mini 1543--Natirasha's On Parole!(Game Over)

[Natirasha]

Vote Count 1.9

MafiaSSK(0):

Cabd(0):

Selkies(3):

Cabd, zMuffinman, MafiaSSK

zMuffinMan(3):

Selkies, FourTrouble, Aronis

FourTrouble(0):

King Kenny(0):

The Goodfather(0):

kabooooom(0):

Karlos4(0):

RossWilliam(0):

Aronis(0):

Idiotking(0):

Katsuki(0):

No Lynch(0):

Not Voting(7):

King Kenny, The Goodfather, kabooooom, Karlos4, RossWilliam, Idiotking, Katsuki

With thirteen alive, it takes seven to lynch.

Deadline:

(expired on 2014-02-04 21:00:00)

Non-confirmed players have fourty-eight hours to confirm.

(expired on 2014-01-23 21:00:00)

[Selkies]

hey cabd you wanna vote muffin now

The tenacity of your read and or push on him is actually giving me confusion and off notes to the tune of "Let's do exactly the opposite of what we did as scum in 1531" so nope. I can't believe I have to tell YOUR HYDRA, of all things, that I'll vote when I'm damn well ready.

mercurial and tenacious. The borkgame was a hell of a hydra 101 class.

[Cabd]

goodfather probs town.

[Aronis]

So. . . I'm going to guess MafiaSSK and FourTrouble are town.

So. . .

[VOTE: zMuffin]

So how about you describe your reason?

Seems like a decent vote, either him, Selkies, or Katsuki. They seem the most likely tk be scum. Do you have a better idea?

Okay so you seem to think that scum is in that group. Why that group in particular? Because they've been the ones that have been most often voted on?

Maybe they've been the most voted on for a reason? They just seem a bit suspicous, that's all.

[zMuffinMan]

Muffin's popped in, dropped a few scum reads, refused to give any reasoning when prompted multiple times, and posted a bunch of crap. "His activity" is underwhelming because he's presumably in-thread and refusing to interact with his scumreads or push anything. "His content" is shit.

i only "dropped" one scum read
why do you think i'm more likely to refuse to give reasoning as scum?
and my activity is what my activity is. i'm reading other games, not sitting here f5ing this thread.

[zMuffinMan]

goodfather probs town

i know why you're saying this but it's not a difficult thing to fake

[MafiaSSK]

People

not named cabd

don't actually get to slap down a scumread on me and then not push that wagon. That's not how this works.

FTFY

It's amazing how often I forget that you're actually a person and not just an annoying bot.

Pedit: Oh, glorious MafiaSSK, "I am known to lurk at times. I am known to be anti-town. I am known for policy lynches. So yeah.", depart unto us more holy advice with which to lynch the wretched scum

Wait, when did I say that?
And why can't my advice be treated as equal here?

It's on your damn wiki page, Mr. "How-Dare-You-Call-Me-An-Easy-Lynch"

I might consider it if you had a smidgeon of reasoning behind it. But it doesn't, much like your vote on me. For, uh, what was it again? Oh right. Nothing.

Muffin's popped in, dropped a few scum reads, refused to give any reasoning when prompted multiple times, and posted a bunch of crap. "His activity" is underwhelming because he's presumably in-thread and refusing to interact with his scumreads or push anything. "His content" is shit.

Sorry, was busy updating my wiki page. That thing hasn't been updated since I left back in 2010.

It's not nothing.

But yeah. I think you've convinced me for the Muffin wagon.
VOTE: muffin

[Selkies]

goodfather probs town.

Maybe so.

What are you thinking about SSK?

[Cabd]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

[MafiaSSK]

So. . . I'm going to guess MafiaSSK and FourTrouble are town.

So. . .

[VOTE: zMuffin]

So how about you describe your reason?

Seems like a decent vote, either him, Selkies, or Katsuki. They seem the most likely tk be scum. Do you have a better idea?

Okay so you seem to think that scum is in that group. Why that group in particular? Because they've been the ones that have been most often voted on?

Maybe they've been the most voted on for a reason? They just seem a bit suspicous, that's all.

How do they seem suspicious?

[Cabd]

goodfather probs town

i know why you're saying this but it's not a difficult thing to fake

Then you don't know why I'm saying it.

[MafiaSSK]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

Give Aronis a break, Cabd. I'm pretty sure they're new.

[Cabd]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

Give Aronis a break, Cabd. I'm pretty sure they're new.

Does being new make a player less likely to be scum?

I mean I come form a homesite where the average player age is 14, man. I know a thing or two about newer players.

[Cabd]

What are you thinking about SSK?

236 killed a light townread for me.

[MafiaSSK]

goodfather probs town.

Maybe so.

What are you thinking about SSK?

Why I place my vote on my knee to the point where it hurts.

But in game wise? I dunno. Cabd's first vote seems so off. I don't like how non-serious it is for a serious vote.

[MafiaSSK]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

Give Aronis a break, Cabd. I'm pretty sure they're new.

Does being new make a player less likely to be scum?

I mean I come form a homesite where the average player age is 14, man. I know a thing or two about newer players.

A. Are you seriously being an ageist? Stop that shit.
B. No, but it means him not explaining his scumreads isn't a scumtell.

[MafiaSSK]

What are you thinking about SSK?

236 killed a light townread for me.

How so? Because I challenged your read?

[Cabd]

That's not why I voted him.

And if I were ageist, I'd be saying that his age or lack thereof makes him scum. My point was that the younger kids where I play still play like relative noobs so I've developed ways to read players not using classical regular player tells.

[Selkies]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

Give Aronis a break, Cabd. I'm pretty sure they're new.

Does being new make a player less likely to be scum?

I mean I come form a homesite where the average player age is 14, man. I know a thing or two about newer players.

gotta catch em all

if you know what i mean

i mean catching scum

Muffin's popped in, dropped a few scum reads, refused to give any reasoning when prompted multiple times, and posted a bunch of crap. "His activity" is underwhelming because he's presumably in-thread and refusing to interact with his scumreads or push anything. "His content" is shit.

i only "dropped" one scum read
why do you think i'm more likely to refuse to give reasoning as scum?
and my activity is what my activity is. i'm reading other games, not sitting here f5ing this thread.

no, you dropped a few reads though

idk man reasoning is sometimes important

also you've avoided me for about 4 pages despite being inthread. what's up with that, scared?

Pedit what the shit is an ageist

[MafiaSSK]

That's not why I voted him.

And if I were ageist, I'd be saying that his age or lack thereof makes him scum. My point was that the younger kids where I play still play like relative noobs so I've developed ways to read players not using classical regular player tells.

Then what is it? Explain your might tell.

[Cabd]

What are you thinking about SSK?

236 killed a light townread for me.

How so? Because I challenged your read?

It wasn't "I think X is town" it was "Give X a pass for this thing you found to be scummy" and it's like stepping into my line of investigation.

[MafiaSSK]

Pedit what the shit is an ageist

An ageist is someone who uses someone else's age in a pejorative way.

[Selkies]

It's like there's a shadow-morph in the thread.

[zMuffinMan]

also you've avoided me for about 4 pages despite being inthread. what's up with that, scared?

[Katsuki]

WTF WHERE DID ALL T HESE PAGES COME FROM BUSY SITTING ON VENTRILLO PLAYING A LITTLE DOTA