A scum read and vote that you yourself haven't explained. So far it's been, "Oh yeah, they have good points to I'll vote now."In post 644, Toomai wrote:Why is that? Because I went back to a previous scumread that appeared to be gaining steam?In post 639, YuniChikako wrote:Give raisins, because this post and vote furthers my scum read on you.
In post 650, YuniChikako wrote:What I'm saying is, give meyourthinking on JKLM. If he looks so scum to you that you want to vote him, give usyourreads.
In post 373, Toomai wrote:Little original thought or effort, then jumps on the end of the wagon because...something about laziness? And sheeping "this is AtE" from someone who isn't actually on the wagon. I don't like that at all.
One maybe.In post 653, evilpacman18 wrote: in between about 154 and 403 you complained or made snide remarks about a bunch of posts without much indication at all that you were attempting to find reads.
Yep.In post 653, evilpacman18 wrote: Then all of a sudden in 403 you had a list placing every single player in the game.
I don't post every read as I get it and as it changes, there isn't a point, it just clutters the thread. My scumreads are easy to follow and that is what matters. If you wish to dispute that this is true please do so by showing which of my scum reads isn't obvious.In post 653, evilpacman18 wrote: I don't see the progression there and when I pointed out that you weren't actually saying anything, I was getting at the point that you showed no indication of progress made towards placing the game. It makes your whole list seem really arbitrary too...
That second one is laughable; everyone please look at it.
Not Pointless.In post 653, evilpacman18 wrote: and the pointlessness of this "question" you refuse to get over when I've already explained that it isn't the right question at all and has no specific answer.
Yes, he reached those conclusions on weak information, and then tried to bolster them through some VCA. But, he always does that. The fact is you can see HOW he reached his weak conclusions in the first place.In post 638, Bulbazak wrote:No he hasn't. He already knew what conclusions he wanted to reach, and then made up some BS for each VC so that he could reach them. If you had been paying attention to his posts this game, you should not have been surprised by any of his conclusions.
Ah, I'm sorry I missed that. I'm sorry, I take back what I said, your vote doesn't make my scum read on you go up.In post 651, Toomai wrote:In post 650, YuniChikako wrote:What I'm saying is, give meyourthinking on JKLM. If he looks so scum to you that you want to vote him, give usyourreads.In post 373, Toomai wrote:Little original thought or effort, then jumps on the end of the wagon because...something about laziness? And sheeping "this is AtE" from someone who isn't actually on the wagon. I don't like that at all.
I'm not seeing any past Maxous and mastin2 readslists being the same. Can you clarify?In post 657, T S O wrote:So went back and re-read for the sole purpose of sorting out Mastin. To really test this, I looked at readslists, got my conclusions, then checked his.
re: Maxous' readslists, they're exactly the same, exactly. the. same.
Bulba, I tried, but pretty sure you're incorrect here.
Let me take a different angle on this. How is that a town slip?
What are you talking about ?In post 662, Yiley wrote:How does that matter when the other two may or may not be? Check me all out and if one is not it doesn't matter statement is still true.
I have clearly said none are and have addressed why. I am specifically calling out that one as it very clearly isn't (the others can be debated but they are not).In post 662, Yiley wrote:How does that matter when the other two may or may not be? Check me all out and if one is not it doesn't matter statement is still true.
Mastin analysed Maxous' readlists and came up with conclusions. To test his mindset, I did it myself before looking at his conclusions. We had the same ones.In post 660, Toomai wrote:I'm not seeing any past Maxous and mastin2 readslists being the same. Can you clarify?In post 657, T S O wrote:So went back and re-read for the sole purpose of sorting out Mastin. To really test this, I looked at readslists, got my conclusions, then checked his.
re: Maxous' readslists, they're exactly the same, exactly. the. same.
Bulba, I tried, but pretty sure you're incorrect here.
A different angle because your first attempt to pin me with some fake bullshit failed? nah, scum
aptil, it was just a weird defense that sort of fits into what else I was thinking, given I have scum reads on both of you and don't really see space for either of you Maxous' team. So this isn't something that I would work off specifically for obtaining reads, but it helps reinforce what I was thinking. Also I think someone else said this but that second sentence doesn't actually make any sense and so providing it as an excuse for his defending you makes me think he has other reasons to want to defend youIn post 487, Yiley wrote:I agree with T S O April isn't neccesarily mafia just for a hammer. We need to go on the attack and not be reflexively defensive.
If you want to try and spin it that way that's fine.In post 667, evilpacman18 wrote: A different angle because your first attempt to pin me with some fake bullshit failed? nah, scum
In post 668, evilpacman18 wrote:aptil, it was just a weird defense that sort of fits into what else I was thinking, given I have scum reads on both of you and don't really see space for either of you Maxous' team. So this isn't something that I would work off specifically for obtaining reads, but it helps reinforce what I was thinking. Also I think someone else said this but that second sentence doesn't actually make any sense and so providing it as an excuse for his defending you makes me think he has other reasons to want to defend youIn post 487, Yiley wrote:I agree with T S O April isn't neccesarily mafia just for a hammer. We need to go on the attack and not be reflexively defensive.
This post was also kind of defending me . This came before Yiley's post , why didn't you feel this was weird ?
But isn't it a distinct disadvantage for scum to come into a game advertised and titled as multiball and act like it isn't? At best it makes them stand out; at worst it makes it obvious they're only hunting for one opposing group.In post 669, Slandaar wrote:You are telling me someone suggesting they don't know it is multiball makes them town. I am saying that actually scum wouldn't come into the game acting like they know it is multiball.
This is the first non-RVS Desperado vote all game. Explain it.
How did you come to that conclusion ?
In post 672, Toomai wrote:But isn't it a distinct disadvantage for scum to come into a game advertised and titled as multiball and act like it isn't? At best it makes them stand out; at worst it makes it obvious they're only hunting for one opposing group.In post 669, Slandaar wrote:You are telling me someone suggesting they don't know it is multiball makes them town. I am saying that actually scum wouldn't come into the game acting like they know it is multiball.This is the first non-RVS Desperado vote all game. Explain it.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php?a ... 9&sr=posts