Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:So you're claiming Cop then? When did this happen exactly, and why didn't you counter-claim him yesterday when he claimed RB?Jack wrote:I got a guilty on atticus.
![Image](http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a136/AjaxUD/goodposting.gif)
Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:So you're claiming Cop then? When did this happen exactly, and why didn't you counter-claim him yesterday when he claimed RB?Jack wrote:I got a guilty on atticus.
Who did you investigate N0 then please?Jack wrote:I got a guilty last night obviously. He isn't the blocker so he didn't block me.Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:So you're claiming Cop then? When did this happen exactly, and why didn't you counter-claim him yesterday when he claimed RB?Jack wrote:I got a guilty on atticus.
Why would you not protect N0?Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:Who did you investigate N0 then please?
I didn't protect Night 0, just Glork on Night 1
It might not be the smartest play, they don't know they can trust me.Atticus wrote:If you got a guilty on me, Jack, why aren't you voting me?
This would work for example.Right now I'm thinking that, if a Cop is guaranteed sane, then we lynch Jack. If he's lying scum, we win. If he's telling the truth, I will vig Atticus tonight and we will still win.
Alright, answer it thenVel-Rahn Koon wrote:Glork wrote:No. The last scumMUSTbe Atticus or Jack.
1) Atticus is lying, and Jack got a guilty on him. We lynch Jack as town and Atticus gets vigged overnight as scum.
2) Atticus is telling the truth, and Jack is full of crap. We lynch Jack and win.
It's a done deal regardless.Vote: JackNVM
Missed the deadline when my wireless dropped.Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:Who did you investigate N0 then please?Jack wrote:I got a guilty last night obviously. He isn't the blocker so he didn't block me.Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:So you're claiming Cop then? When did this happen exactly, and why didn't you counter-claim him yesterday when he claimed RB?Jack wrote:I got a guilty on atticus.
I didn't protect Night 0, just Glork on Night 1