Mini 396: ChatMafia Mafia; GAME OVER

[ChannelDelibird]

Let me put it this way - we STILL have to do this ridiculous law? I was thinking/hoping/desperately praying to all the world's gods that we'd got rid of that.

Jack, vis-à-vis said law, if you weren't dead already I'd kill you for it.

Zindy, you're begging the question. Why isn't Now A Scumbag in your list?

Some twonk/scum blocked me last night, ergo you're still the only one I have info on. I think I was blocked last night as well. The fact that you're the only player I am confident is town concordantly makes me more annoyed that you aren't recognising that Now A Mafia should be Now A Corpse.

[HackerHuck]

Zindy, you're begging the question. Which one of the four do you feel are scum and what are your parameters for feeling that way? 50/50 is close enough to guess, so in terms of action, I'm surprised by your lack thereof.

Far be it from me to simply parrot someone, I'm in agreement with CDB that we need to be looking at StallingChamp/AniX/Now a Ranger/Newest scum replacement.


This is a bit off-topic, but I prefer to use Vis-à-vis markers when using the overhead projector. Does anyone concur?

[Twito]

Let me put it this way
Be that as it may
Far be it from me
In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were
Verily
Qua
So to speak
ergo
Q.E.D.
e.g.
i.e.
You're begging the question.
You're being defensive.
Don't compare apples to oranges.
What are your parameters?
You're so linear

I haven't read anything since I got arrested and don't have time atm.

[Y]

So... First death... As in the past deaths, we know alignment, but not a role, which is annoying.

milkman as town is a big surprise for me...

I have to do a little reread and then I'll post a more meaningful post.

In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were

[Zindaras]

I would, as it were, certainly enjoy seeing who you think would be, in terms of scumbuddies, Now a ranger's. We're looking for a scumgroup, not a lone killer. Concordantly, I do not see now a ranger a scum, as I do not see, as it were, a buddy for him.

CDB's whole cop thing seems pretty towny to me, so I'm left with Y, Twito and HackerHuck in terms of possible scum.

Be that as it may, I believe that by simply lynching these three players, the town will inevitably win.

Eh, I just noticed that Coron is still in the game. He's possible scum as well, obviously.

I have already outlined my reasons for finding Y and Twito suspicious.

[Twito]

Can I just add one of those sentences to my sig to avoid getting arrested or does it have to be in my post?

Let me put it this way
Be that as it may
Far be it from me
In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were
Verily
Qua
So to speak
ergo
Q.E.D.
e.g.
i.e.
You're begging the question.
You're being defensive.
Don't compare apples to oranges.
What are your parameters?
You're so linear

[al_kohaulec]

Your sig is not a part of your post .

It has to be in your post.

[Coron]

That seems like a matter of opinion Al_ko. Your opinion appears to be one way.

Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were
Verily
Qua
So to speak
ergo

[al_kohaulec]

I'm a little nervous about this, with what happened with nar, but

I_aM_ScuM replaces now a ranger.

[HackerHuck]

I would, as it were, certainly enjoy seeing who you think would be, in terms of scumbuddies, Now a ranger's. We're looking for a scumgroup, not a lone killer. Concordantly, I do not see now a ranger a scum, as I do not see, as it were, a buddy for him.

CDB's whole cop thing seems pretty towny to me, so I'm left with Y, Twito and HackerHuck in terms of possible scum.

Be that as it may, I believe that by simply lynching these three players, the town will inevitably win.

Eh, I just noticed that Coron is still in the game. He's possible scum as well, obviously.

I have already outlined my reasons for finding Y and Twito suspicious.

It looks like Zindy used the following phrases to follow the law:
as it were
in terms of
concordantly
as it were
Be that as it may
in terms of
Be that as it may

Hopefully it is allowable to use the same phrase more than once, but I don't want to risk it. Ergo, I will use another phrase to obey the law - so to speak.

I don't know that you can discount Now a Ranger's scumminess because his potential scum partner was not apparent. I also would like to see more evidence against Me, Twito, and Y than the fact that we were all on the Milkman wagon.

[HurriKaty]

Katy didn't send in all of her night choices.

I trust Zindaras for now cuz of that statement.

In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were

[Twito]

Let me put it this way
Be that as it may
Far be it from me
In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were
Verily
Qua
So to speak
ergo
Q.E.D.
e.g.
i.e.
You're begging the question.
You're being defensive.
Don't compare apples to oranges.
What are your parameters?
You're so linear

Check the vacation thread.

[Y]

Does anybody other than me is bothered by the way Twito fails to add content while still posting? I consider him a lurker.

I can also agree with Zindy's reasons.

Ergo,

FoS: Twito.

Qua
So to speak
ergo
Q.E.D.

[Zindaras]

I trust Zindaras for now cuz of that statement.

In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were

Why, for the love of god, did you not free us from this law?

Y and Twito are clearly the two remaining scumbags.

Vote: Twito

(am I already voting him?)

[Twito]

Let me put it this way
Be that as it may
Far be it from me
In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were
Verily
Qua
So to speak
ergo
Q.E.D.
e.g.
i.e.
You're begging the question.
You're being defensive.
Don't compare apples to oranges.
What are your parameters?
You're so linear

Actually if I read my role pm correctly I'm pro-town so could you let me know if there is some case againts me?

[al_kohaulec]

al_kohaulec:

Here comes a

Vote Count:

Twito

- 1 - Zindaras

Those inactive in chat

- 7 - I_aM_ScuM, HurriKaty, Coron, Y, HackerHuck, ChannelDelibird, Twito

8 alive, 5 to lynch

Each post must contain at least 5 of the following:

Let me put it this way
Be that as it may
Far be it from me
In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were
Verily
Qua
So to speak
ergo
Q.E.D.
e.g.
i.e.
You're begging the question.
You're being defensive.
Don't compare apples to oranges.
What are your parameters?
You're so linear

[HurriKaty]

I trust Zindaras for now cuz of that statement.

In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were

Why, for the love of god, did you not free us from this law?

Y and Twito are clearly the two remaining scumbags.

Vote: Twito

(am I already voting him?)

Because I'm a bad little scummer who wasn't on for like.. a week.

I trust Zindaras for now cuz of that statement.

In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were

[HurriKaty]

^^^^^^^^ Shoot, c/ped too much in that last post.

In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were

[Zindaras]

Let me put it this way
Be that as it may
Far be it from me
In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis

Actually if I read my role pm correctly I'm pro-town so could you let me know if there is some case againts me?

Post 423.

Also, Katy, you're such a naughty girl.

*giggles*

I said naughty.

[HackerHuck]

You're begging the question. In terms of blame for this rediculous law, is Hurrikaty the culprit?

OK, let me put it this way...

Far be it from me to assume this, but is Zindaras claiming that Hurrikaty's missing night action one that would have repealed this onerous law?

Qua tsch!

Zindy, I'm also not seeing the case against me...that is if you have one.


Where is I_am_Scum?

[HurriKaty]

You're begging the question. In terms of blame for this rediculous law, is Hurrikaty the culprit?

Let me put it this way
Be that as it may
Far be it from me
In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis

No, I am not to blame. I MAY have had the chance to have freed you all from it had I been paying attention though...

[Y]

Y and Twito are clearly the two remaining scumbags.

Vote: Twito

(am I already voting him?)

I'll

Vote Twito

then, since he's a scumbag according to Zindy.

I was worried for a moment. We actually had a day or two without any one trying to lynch me (Which means Twito will probably try to do just that). I'm not used to not having to defend myself all the time...

In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were

[Y]

Is any one still playing?

In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were

[HurriKaty]

I definately am, though I think it might be time to send out some prods to like.. everyone.

In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-à-vis
Per se
As it were

[HackerHuck]

In terms of prods, I don't think that they will be the best stimulator of discussion per se. As it were (or is?), I'm finding this silly law - i.e. the post restriction - to be the biggest hindrance to my contribution. Far be it from me to pretend I know better than the mod, so I will leave it to his discretion.

Zindaras, you're begging the question - why are you ignoring my question?