In post 2231, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote: In post 2226, geists wrote: In post 2224, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:@ Geists, the thing that is bothering me about you is that you are very quick to criticise and scumread anyone who attacks MC but you haven't said anything at all about Mara's attack. You say you are conflict averse but you haven't critisized the instigator of the conflict. You are merely pushing at anyone that calls them out. That doesn't seem genuine to me. It seems as though in your mind, MC can create as much conflict as they want but anyone that calls them out and scumreads them for creating that conflict is discredited or scumread which doesn't make any sense.
I do defend my townreads, but I'm not scumreading anyone who attacks MC. If I were, Tammy wouldn't be my strongest townread. Afaik, the only person I'm "attacking" about MC Maraca is you.
I talked about Mara's attack in my reply to your quotewall.
I said you were discrediting (Tammy) and attacking (me) players pushing MC.
I think the term "discredit" gets overused in mafia. I think she's wrong. I understand the reasons why she's scumreading Mara, but I disagree, in part because I've been on the receiving end of something somewhat similar from her at least once, and maybe twice. If it was twice (hard to say due to a sudden end-of-day) then in both cases it was a reaction test.
I get your point about Mara having done it before. But from your POV as a conflict averse person who is considering replacing out, it would have made more sense to me if you called out Mara for instigating the conflict. Regardless of whether her motivation was scum-sided, the ultimate effect of their push helped scum more. Your priorities seem to be misplaced in that you are defending the instigator of the conflict from players that are calling them out. Why are you okay with Mara helping scum intentionally or accidentally while pushing at anyone that question her? That doesn't seem right. It seemed as though you pre-decided that you would be "on their side" in the event of a conflict. The other thing that doesn't make sense is that Cabd is skilled enough as scum to fool you, so the lack of paranoia there is troubling as well.
I am not by nature conflict-averse. Those circuits are pretty much burnt out at the moment, though the scorched smell is dissipating.
I don't agree with your premise that Mara's actions were helping scum. I think reactions/non-reactions beyond the two at the flashpoint will be revealing when people look back at day 1 further down the road. You are being every bit as one-sided about them as you claim I am being. And, that is a considerable part of what's making me uneasy about you atm.
Maybe it's the holidays. I feel like a lot of people are overreacting and underestimating others' likely reactions. And that's across the board.
As far as Cabd fooling me, he probably still can, but it's going to take some changes in tactics. And first he has to zero in on what I'm looking for in him as town right now. If he's scum, I'm pretty sure I'll figure it out with time.