Mini 414-Anime Mafia | GAME OVAH!

[IH]

Oldman with horrible dubbing-You darn kids get off my lawn! I'm not giving you back your...

-----------------Votecount-------------------------
Yamahako -1- (Ubertimmy)
Ubertimmy -1- (Jack)
Thrawn1020 -1- ( Abbott)
Skruffs -1- ( Mert)
Mert -1- (Skruffs)
Hemisphere Dancer -3- (Cuban Smoker, Thrawn 1020, Yamahako)



Not voting - (Hemisphere Dancer, Cubsfan4ever, AndrewS, Spectrumvoid)

Prods being sent out to all those who haven't posted in 4 days

[AndrewS]

I'm still here. I'll do a reread and post later today.

[AbboTT]

Ditto^

Make that later tonight, though.

[Cubsfan4ever]

why not just lynch the cancer (Jack)?

[AbboTT]

why not just lynch the cancer (Jack)?

I think it's a little past time for games, man.
You sound

way

too sure of Jack's role.
I'm jumping on board.

Unvote, Vote:Cubsfan4ever

[AndrewS]

He never claimed to know Jack's role specifically. He meant that Jack was drawing attention away from the real game, if I am correct.

[Jack]

What real game?

[AndrewS]

The game that doesn't involve you voting for nonsensical reasons in the mid-stage of the day.

[Skruffs]

Misread that as "nonsensical masons" for some reason
And yeah, exactly what andrews said.

Abbott, curious why you targetted cubs for responding to jack, rather than jack for still reasonlessly vote hopping.

[Jack]

The game that doesn't involve you voting for nonsensical reasons in the mid-stage of the day.

If this is mid-stage we're in trouble.

[Skruffs]

Jack.. are you stating that you would prefer to have a better game offered for your perusal?
That happens when people who are interested in the game go back through and look for something, or offer a theory, or make a bold statement. It's not something you are going to find by poking random people in the forehead.

Confirm Vote : Jack for inciting apathy

[spectrumvoid]

I don't think Skruffs is our best first day target. I

like to leave suspicious

but active

players around

for a day or two, let the cops check 'em out, let the mafia off the innocent ones. We really should be focusing on people who don't contribute much, people trying to fly under the radar, etc.

This post made me spill my coffee. Seriously, did you just say you don't want to lynch scummy people?

So HD, anything now that you're reappeared? And where's the other one Yama?

[AbboTT]

Abbott, curious why you targetted cubs for responding to jack, rather than jack for still reasonlessly vote hopping.

Jack seems a little scummy, but he seems to have a little of the Twito syndrome. Being random (and annoying ) doesn't always indicate guilt.

I also haven't given a terrible amount of reasoning with my posts. I didn't want to come off as being hypocritical.



@AndrewS: That could very well be what he meant (And that would make plenty of sense). I would like to hear him say that, though.

[Mert]

@AndrewS: That could very well be what he meant (And that would make plenty of sense). I would like to hear him say that, though.

Absolutely. This is the sort of thing I was getting at earlier when I said that people weren't allowing enough time for a response.

Andrew's Post 128 answers on behalf of Cubsfan, just like he did in Post 205. In addition to this, his Post 150, which reads:

Oh, and

Unvote: Cubsfan

The vote on him was random and I just realized that I was still voting for him.

Just strikes me as rather odd. I believe this may be either Andrew trying to attach himself to Cubsfan or some kind of connection of sorts. I favour the former at the moment, just because I've not seen much evidence of Cubsfan reciprocating. But I remain suspicious enough of Andrew to

Unvote

and

Vote: AndrewS

.

[cuban smoker]

spectrumvoid, you misinterpert the purpose of the strategy. I will bodly venture that it is hard to pick out mafia on the first day. This being said, while everyone has their suspicions, no one (save for the scum) have anything solid to go on. The word scummy has been used 'today' to describe pretty much every type of behaviour we've seen. I would rather lynch a quiet (and thus scummy to me) person over a active and scummy person.

We are not trying to catch all the mafia right now. We are trying to catch them within a few days.

I'm starting to tire of Jack's antics. Skruffs has made a reasonable point concerning said antics. Thus:

unvote, vote: Jack

[Jack]

In my opinion it's just as useful to see who will grow "tired" of antics and and vote to eliminate the "cancer/unhelpful townie"...it's often scum.

[Cubsfan4ever]

Mert, Andrew has a connection to me for unvoting me after his random vote when we were already well underway with the day? Ok then..

Vote: Jack

People who act "odd" and "random" to me don't suggest town as all they do is confuse the town and create harm. That's what scum members want, not town members.

[ubertimmy]

pretty sure yamahako is scum

[Yamahako]

unvote (if I'm voting), Vote Cubsfan4ever

How sure are you that Jack is acting off or Random

Ubertimmy, you said that before, have any reasoning behind it?

[Jack]

The town isn't stupid. Dropping random votes here and there isn't going to confuse them. In fact there is no evidence of them being confused, quite the opposite.

The fact that people are talking about it and we have a serious wagon means it does help discussion.

Unvote,Vote:cubsfan4ever

[Skruffs]

unvote (if I'm voting), Vote Cubsfan4ever

How sure are you that Jack is acting off or Random

Ubertimmy, you said that before, have any reasoning behind it?

Uhh... Jack isn't acting random? Because...

The town isn't stupid. Dropping random votes here and there isn't going to confuse them. In fact there is no evidence of them being confused, quite the opposite.

Jack says he is... and has been.
But I congradulate jack on his first vote with reasoning in it.
Things are less random, now.

[Cubsfan4ever]

Can someone explain Yamahko and Abott's votes on me... I sound too sure Jack's scum. That doesn't make too much sense. I'm merely attempting to hunt for odd and suspicious behavior, which I see as going hand in hand. Jack's odd behavior does not strike me as town-like and anything not town-like must be scum-like. I am not "sure" he is scum, I merely see the probability for him being scum as being greater than anyone else. What the hell was Abott's reference to "jumping on board" anyways about?

[AbboTT]

@Cub's Fan

You say that your being sure of somebody's role isn't scummy? Only scum know for sure who is what. Townies have no solid evidence, and therefore no reason to attempt to sound so sure of themselves and use such inflammatory descriptions (i.e., "cancer).

You're "merely attempting to hunt for odd and suspicious behavior" ?
Well guess what... me too.

And your post was odd.

Answer#2

My reference to "jumping on board" was due to oversight on my part. You had two votes on you and they both switched on page 8. My bad.

By the way--- You can ask me questions directly. Asking other people to answer for me is fairly counterproductive (Seeing as how we are judging each other's characters here ). I don't bite. Promise.

Also, talking to the 'crowd' like that as opposed to me personally makes me think that you are, in fact, talking to a crowd. Only scum have to worry about showmanship.

My vote stays.

I realize that I'm stretching a bit here guys. These are very minor scum-tells in my book.

[AbboTT]

Oh also

@Cub's

You didn't answer my original allegation in spite of the fact that we already had a conversation about my not wanting to hear the answer from Jack, but you personally.

Please provide reasoning as to why Jack is such a "cancer."

[Cubsfan4ever]

I'm not sure about Jack's role. No more than you are sure of my role..

Jack is a "cancer" because his style of play is unproductive to the town and does not aid us in any way. Voting randomly is distracting and to me suggests odd behavior.