In post 5297, AGar wrote: In post 5296, Majiffy wrote: In post 5264, AGar wrote:The only "direct order" Pie received was "hit scum." No one credible actually stepped up and offered up a legitimate shot for Pie.
Pray tell who "someone credible" would be.
There's a short list of who I wouldn't have accepted as credible in this game, and it includes Wake.
Definition of credible per AGar the dictionary ~ anyone sharing the same agenda as AGar
In post 5296, Majiffy wrote: In post 5264, AGar wrote:To be completely honest, you've fucking shut down since Pie's been leashed. If you're pissed, fine, I get it. ... You want the rights to pontificate? Sack up and fucking scumhunt outside of Pie. The only thing remotely close to it I've seen is pointing out a potential Wake scum-slip.
Then you aren't reading. I've already listed scum partners for Pie given a faction flip. And I have strong ideas of scum if he flips SK.
Just because you aren't reading doesn't mean I'm not doing.
You're giving us partners for a faction flip, and hoarding ideas for the more likely SK flip. This is not helping.
How is it not helpful? All you gotta do is lynch Pie and then all those lists become relevant. That's how mafia is played. But you don't want to lynch pie. Because you don't want those lists to become relevant.
In post 5296, Majiffy wrote:
In post 5264, AGar wrote:
The Pieguy=factionscum case has literally zero grounding to stand on. Fucking support the case.
I have. You haven't been reading carefully.
I re-read your ISO because this game has been out of fucking control and too many pages... I don't see anything beyond you claiming him assuming multiball is a slip. That's not enough for me. Ok, there's also "He's been arguing from the perspective of factional scum and not self-aligned SK." Still not enough. I want a damned good reason as to why a faction would agree to hamstring their kill on suboptimal targets to save one fucking scumbag. Because that's just asinine to do, if you ask me. Bus the scumbag and move on with your kill unhampered.
Skimming =/= READING
In post 5296, Majiffy wrote:
Great attitude considering he's a counterwagon to a known scum who I have given strong arguments for being factional.
If I'm not buying Pie=factionscum (I outlined the ONE reason where Pie=factionscum is remotely possible and it involves a dead Wake, mind you, so still Wakescum), why would I buy Wake-town being a counterwagon to faction-Pie?
Please quote or link or at least give me #s for said "strong arguments."
You're a player I'd rather have active in this game right now Jiffy and helping to obliterate this shit, so please be to helping me help you. Because right now I see scumbag Wake who needs to die and SK pie who needs to eventually die but not faction pie.
You're putting too many parameters on it. You'll always have an excuse to "not buy it", but this is the reason.
There's only been one flip both nights. The flip last night STRONGLY hints there're two scum teams whether Pie is SK or not. This is highly relevant for calculating probabilities.
One day kill D1 and two 3-person scum teams gives 16 people for a scum faction to choose from N1
Night One probabilities for two NK being blocked:
1:16 * 1:15 U 1:15 * 1:14 SK doesn't really factor in because scum gets the preknowledge of that kill) which is 1 in 50,400 games where that will happen.
Night Two probabilities
1:15 * 1:14 U 1:14 * 1:13 which is roughly 1 in 38,220 games
For that to happen both nights you have a union of 50,400 and 38,220 ~ or roughly 1 in 1,926,288,000 games. With how screwed this game has been, do you really think this is that game?
