Newbie 320 - Berry Village Mafia V (Game Over!)

[remussaidow]

yeah.

[Nocmen]

Hmm...I really cant tell right now with now a ranger, this is definitely regarding WIFOM, and to be honest I hate when that happens. Im not sure if hes saying that to just quit like that, or if its a joke (which i have claimed before doesnt have its place in Mafia unless you can pull it off just right).

I continue the FoS/IGMEOY on him though, theres just not enough to make a full judgement call.

Unvote

for now.

[Peter Venkman]

Nocmen

>

I looked over the last page again and it appears your vote was on

CES

. Why did you unvote him?

-Peter

[GreenLiquid]

I'm mafia.

>_<
It would have been a little more interesting if you had actually... you know...

defended

yourself. Uggh.

Vote: now a ranger

[Blackberry]

Azibo Village Vote Count

[/color]

Cogito Ergo Sum

# 1 [now a ranger]

now a ranger

# 1 [GreenLiquid]

Not Voting: Eldarion, Peter Venkman, remussaidow, Cogito Ergo Sum, Nocmen

Four Votes to Lynch.

[Nocmen]

Peter: I unvoted CES for now due to the fact that the situation really has me confused, and honestly I think that its impossible for CES to be paired with Now a Ranger, which makes me think much more that he is either playing us or really gave up.

Logic points me toward the latter, and even if he was lying, it was still a very stupid move. Consideration on this issue shows that something is definitly wrong.

Vote:Now a Ranger

[now a ranger]

I did that because one of you said I had crappy play when I should have done something a lot better.


I said that I am mafia to show what REAL crappy, controversial play is.


As you all know, I already said I was a townie before and metagamed , and I wasn't kidding about that.


And besides, all of you jumping so suddenly to the VOTE NOW A RANGER aren't doing so well. What evidence do you have?

The people who voted for me are all major FOS

[Peter Venkman]

Now a Ranger

>

One of us? That player might have apologized too.

Your display of "real controversial" play has done nothing for the town. Please stop meta-gaming and give us some serious content.

For example: it is helpful if you type something along the lines of FoS: X for reason Y.

Your use of "all of you" isn't really clear. Only two people actually voted for you, which is a small minority. The rest of us were turned off by your disregard for taking the game seriously.

-Peter

[now a ranger]

2 people is already past the usual 1 vote to make the person talk.


just one more, and i would be under the just one more vote and I'm dead, and the voter who does that is probably the mafia who comes to finish off.

Also, I just saw that the person apologized. oops


I just think that if CES is mafia, so is Nocmen.

I'm going to read some of this stuff and post some more later, I have to go do my school homework.

[now a ranger]

who knows, if I hadn't posted less than an hour ago, someone might have placed the 3rd vote, and BAM almost dead.

[remussaidow]

Calling yourself mafia in no way shape or form ever helps town. That being said, you are now only helping mafia. Since I don't having friends of scum confusing the town, I'm gonna have to

vote: now a ranger

also, its because you attempted to defend your idiotic actions, and you didn't even say anything at all/

[now a ranger]

fine. I'm a townie, as I said before. I swore and still swear on my mother's grave ( and my family's too, although that is considered metagaming)


Remus, I think you should have been lynched when you had three votes on you, since I really think you and CES are scum.


Go ahead and place the 4th vote. You'll see I'm indeed a citizen. I'm just a first-time newbie player, so I'm not good at this game yet.

[now a ranger]

you're not helping the town either at all by voting on me when I'm a townie

[GreenLiquid]

Unvote

[GreenLiquid]

I had originally thought that now a ranger was scum giving up, but apparently now is town being a dumbass (or scum being a dumbass, who knows). Remussaidow's reasons for voting are

very

poor. In a game where 2 mislynches equal a loss, you do

not

lynch someone for not being helpful, you lynch because you think they're scum.

[now a ranger]

unvote. VOTE: Remussaidow

He should have been lynched earlier. His 3rd vote also motivates me to vote on him.

[GreenLiquid]

WTF?

That change of attitude does not compute. Just a few posts ago you are like "waah, go ahead and lynch me, I'm a townie<martyr>", and now you're like "you put a third vote on me! you're scum!" Explain?

[now a ranger]

NVM.


I'll help the town by voting on myself.

VOTE: NOW A RANGER

[Blackberry]

Azibo Village Vote Count

[/color]

now a ranger

### 3 [Nocmen, remussaidow, now a ranger]

Not Voting: Eldarion, Peter Venkman, Cogito Ergo Sum, GreenLiquid

Four Votes to Lynch.

[Peter Venkman]

Now a Ranger

>

Unvote yourself NOW. You have put yourself in a quicklynch position and this is not a good move. You aren't playing pro-town, and are doing a great job of confusing everyone.

Nothing you have done so far makes sense to me. Please explain how your tactics are helping the town.

Remember, claiming

anything

requires that people have a reason to beleive you. During round one, it is expected that all seven players claim town, actually doing so is redundant.

Also, put yourself in the position of others. If

Remus

claimed on his mother's grave that he was town, would you beleive him?

-Peter

[Nocmen]

I agree with what Peter said. You obviously seem to rather mess around and just tick the town off rather than actually play seriously. That is the main reason why I have a vote on you, is that your play style is just like that of the Mafia, using deceit and confusion to piss off the rest of the town.

Explain yourself and I may consider removing my vote from you (but I doubt that will happen because you do share the ideals of the Mafia).

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

I'm honestly not sure what to make of now a ranger's play. I'm gonna have to think on it.

[now a ranger]

Now a Ranger

>

If

Remus

claimed on his mother's grave that he was town, would you beleive him?

-Peter

First of all, I shouldn't have done that metagaming. I was just a newbie entering a 1st game, and still am.

[Peter Venkman]

...and?

You were freaking out earlier about being at two votes. You have three on you (one of which you can change) and you don't care??

-Peter

[now a ranger]

It's not like someone would be stupid enough to vote on me in a quicklynch situation without becoming extremely suspicious to others, especially when they find out who I am, or would he or she?