To Glork: it just seems that you are over-defending yourself a lot for the role you claimed. Given that my initial posts explicitly delineated my intention to believe your claim despite my suspicions, I thought you would shut up and leave it at that. The fact that you kept on responding to my posts clarifying my original statement does not look good to me.
Let me clarify once again, and then I am done. Further posts on this issue will not be made by me. An experienced scum player might indeed bus their scumbuddy on Day 1, drop hints about a role, and then claim that role, should they want to remain alive until endgame. Perhaps I am being oversensitive, or even a little nuts by thinking someone else would do such a thing--but the simple fact is that it's something
would contrive to do. And anything my not-terribly-creative or good at deception self could come up with I would simply not put past an experienced player. My intention was never to cast you in a bad light, Glork. It was only to remind the rest of the town that
there is no substance in your role claim which guarantees it to be genuine
. You can't clear anyone; you can't claim to have protected anyone; you can't out anyone. Suspicion should not therefore completely fall from you just because you claimed non-scum. I could claim vanilla townie right now, for example, and it wouldn't make me a damn bit more innocent, because I have no proof. See what I mean? It was a caveat, originally, and a minuscule one at that. You're the one who made it into a big damn deal.
And now I'm done. Your flavor claim seems genuine, and that is what I am basing my decision NOT to vote for you on. Along with FA's claim, I'm willing to for at least this day suspend my suspicions and
unvote, vote: PP
.