In post 1836, Sakura Hana wrote: In post 1832, Wake1 wrote:Pretty hard to fake-claim exact characters and things from some obscure manga universe, isn't it?
You do know that the mod would give fake claims to scum right? That being said tho, I already claimed my character, do you think wrt your flavor = alignment expectancy am i town, scum or TP?
P-Edit: it isn't stupid, it's called avoiding people from breaking your game via flavor.
Eh, I never really cared much for flavored games, and this is my first flavored theme game I've played. Just decided to jump in via replacement and, WOAH, machines and battlefields and morphing tiger ninja machines with samurai blades.
...I can see the reason for that protective function, though.
What I'm trying to ascertain from the majority here is whether or not I should reveal my flavor text and abilities, and WHY. That's one thing I'm seeking, even if I have to pull it out of people.
In post 1837, kanyeknowsbest wrote: In post 1830, Wake1 wrote: In post 1827, kanyeknowsbest wrote: In post 1824, Wake1 wrote: In post 1821, kanyeknowsbest wrote: In post 1667, Wake1 wrote:Well, hell, where to begin? I don't know diddly about Gundam, but I do have a weird name and stuff. Why not claim our names at least? Probably less than half of us know the names in the Gundam thingy.
Anyways, we got less than four days and we need 11 to break through. SO...
VOTE: ArcAngel9
Oh, and who's leading that wagon and why are people joining it?
see heres my problem. you vote aa knowing that shes the lead wagon, but then immediately ask who the lead wagon is. why ask that if you know that aa is the lead wagon already?
This is why you lacking fundamental reading skills, In this other incident, you also managed to not read anything I wrote, and then building off of your inherited confusion. I asked WHO WAS LEADING THE WAGON, not what the leading wagon was. I hope you now understand why I treat you the way I do. Is there anything else you'd like to
(deliberately?)
misinterpret or ignore?
so, as scum, what do you believe i hope to accomplish my misinterpreting that first post?
Hm, well, I dunno. Here, let's open up Pandora's Box.
Disiniformation, confusion, potential mislynching, pissing off people, and general douchery name a few.
how are making people mad @ u and "general douchery" scum motivated? do you honestly believe that such an easily clarified and corrected mistake has the potential to lead to a mislynch or any lasting disinformation?
Scum does make people mad at times on person to sow dissension and contention. Get people mad enough and, hey, you might not get more than half of'em to agree on something, right? No one can know for sure the repercussions, Kanye. How about you stick with not asking questions that are so damned obvious that they've been posted more than once, and reading and, well, actually comprehending what's actually been said before making unsophisticated remarks?