Yes, because in 6644, you are intimating that Nacho would be dumb to kill you, while calling penguin scummy for suggesting it.In post 6449, ffullisade wrote:Is there some reason why you're asking about the blindingly obvious?
No, it is blindingly obvious. Scum-Nacho would kill you, and take PA and me to LYLO. And I would angst about it for two weeks, but reread stuff, including the posts leading up to BabySpice' replace-out, and say, yeah no that was not a town-pirouette and she didn't stick the flounce.In post 6450, PeregrineV wrote:Yes, because in 6644, you are intimating that Nacho would be dumb to kill you, while calling penguin scummy for suggesting it.In post 6449, ffullisade wrote:Is there some reason why you're asking about the blindingly obvious?
So if Nacho is not dumb-scum, but is scum, then who would he kill?
You probably won't, thought.In post 6447, PeregrineV wrote:Then maybe I'll start tomorrow voting penguin.In post 6441, Nachomamma8 wrote:penguin is going to kill ffullisade.In post 6439, PeregrineV wrote:Well, according to you, Penguin (the last scum) is going to kill off both you and Ffullisade (because you both suspect him).
It's a crazy, mixed up world, and there is no telling what could happen.
If I'm in Lylo with town and blue scum, I have a 50% chance (or better even, if I make an educated guess) of hitting scum. Today that would only by 33%, randomly.In post 6451, ffullisade wrote:No, it is blindingly obvious. Scum-Nacho would kill you, and take PA and me to LYLO. And I would angst about it for two weeks, but reread stuff, including the posts leading up to BabySpice' replace-out, and say, yeah no that was not a town-pirouette and she didn't stick the flounce.In post 6450, PeregrineV wrote:Yes, because in 6644, you are intimating that Nacho would be dumb to kill you, while calling penguin scummy for suggesting it.In post 6449, ffullisade wrote:Is there some reason why you're asking about the blindingly obvious?
So if Nacho is not dumb-scum, but is scum, then who would he kill?
You have not budged on your nacho-is-red-scum case and you're holding on to the idea that there's 2 scum in the game.
So, tomorrow, if you are alive and you are correct and I am dead and flipped town, you have two choices:
- You're in LYLO with town and blue scum
- You're kingmaker and you decide which of blue or red scum win
When that sinks in, then please assume town can win. And drop your red scum case. And don't vote Nacho.
Or, join me today and let's end this 5+ month long game.
You probably won't get any indication that you're in a kingmaker situation, and it will be purely your own assumptions about the game state.In post 6454, PeregrineV wrote:If I'm in Lylo with town and blue scum, I have a 50% chance (or better even, if I make an educated guess) of hitting scum. Today that would only by 33%, randomly.In post 6451, ffullisade wrote:No, it is blindingly obvious. Scum-Nacho would kill you, and take PA and me to LYLO. And I would angst about it for two weeks, but reread stuff, including the posts leading up to BabySpice' replace-out, and say, yeah no that was not a town-pirouette and she didn't stick the flounce.In post 6450, PeregrineV wrote:Yes, because in 6644, you are intimating that Nacho would be dumb to kill you, while calling penguin scummy for suggesting it.In post 6449, ffullisade wrote:Is there some reason why you're asking about the blindingly obvious?
So if Nacho is not dumb-scum, but is scum, then who would he kill?
You have not budged on your nacho-is-red-scum case and you're holding on to the idea that there's 2 scum in the game.
So, tomorrow, if you are alive and you are correct and I am dead and flipped town, you have two choices:
- You're in LYLO with town and blue scum
- You're kingmaker and you decide which of blue or red scum win
When that sinks in, then please assume town can win. And drop your red scum case. And don't vote Nacho.
Or, join me today and let's end this 5+ month long game.
Correct?
If I'm kingmaker because scum decides that's there best chance of winning, then I'll listen to both sides arguments and I guess vote the team I hate the least.
Why not do that instead?
You know, if scum were to kill Nacho then I'd be super confused tomorrow....
Only one scum should be a single explosion.In post 6457, ffullisade wrote:Words trickle like rain
While stances remain stagnant
Explosions tonight
I think there is 1 and 1.In post 6456, penguin_alien wrote:PV, ffullisade, any questions you want to discuss? I still see no advantage to lynching today over tomorrow if PV's not sure about scum distribution.
At no point has anyone presented any countervailing logic.In post 6427, PeregrineV wrote:If 3:1 then no lynch is best.
If 2:1:1 then lynching scum loses the game for us. That makes no lynch the best.
Vote: No Lynch
Something aside from a post that's purely prod-dodging.In post 6461, Nachomamma8 wrote:WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO SAY MASTIN
I've presented my problems with that logic.In post 6459, PeregrineV wrote:At no point has anyone presented any countervailing logic.
This was your answer:In post 6465, Nachomamma8 wrote:I've presented my problems with that logic.In post 6459, PeregrineV wrote:At no point has anyone presented any countervailing logic.
In post 6430, Nachomamma8 wrote:peregrine why are you being so unbelievably stubborn
you see that you are very strongly against me
and ffullisade is very strongly against penguin
so if there is only one scum left (literally everyone except for you is saying this)
then the final scum is going to kill off the person who suspects them for a win in 3p