You calling him scummy?
That post from Axxle looks towny to me.
You calling him scummy?
Can you elaborate on where and how?In post 23, Garmr wrote:while fueling the flames between the two wagons.
Did you see this?In post 35, Thor665 wrote:I find those actions a combination of town and null tells.In post 23, Garmr wrote:and he votes still through I find him suspicious for taking so long to vote and the way his just listing people as town so early in the game.
What am I missing here, how are they advantageous to scum?
Why did you write this?In post 44, Garmr wrote: Also your points on Tool are fluff lol the only one I could consider not fluff is the one about pretending to be clueless and that's not really to strong of a sign.
This kind of thing is why I don't phone post lol.In post 48, Macros wrote:Good god my head is ul my ass at the minute
unvote
meant to vote for zakk, I'll just keep it off altogether, I cant seem to trust my brain to fingers communication at the minute.
At work.In post 79, toolenduso wrote:That being said, where the hell is Maxous?
Is'nt it apparent that he has theory differences to you?In post 111, ICEninja wrote:Now I actually really don't like Macros's more recent posts. While his observations and points are alright, he outright states two players he's suspecting and yet votes for no one. This reads to me as leaving his options open instead of pressuring players. Bad.
and yet you have'nt tried to enage anybody 'one on one'In post 134, Garmr wrote:I find one on one the best way to get information as it's what I excelat when I get bombarded by lots of different players I get confused and I try to handle one at a time and I lose pace.
What is this.In post 146, toolenduso wrote:Before I vote, I'd like to point out that I think there's a difference between inactivity and lurking.
And for the record, this is why you should be voting slandaar.In post 146, toolenduso wrote: Then there's this kind of pseudo-lurking where you post enough to not be called a lurker, but you don't say much of substance -- just like a lurker, you're not contributing to the conversation, but you get to escape from the label.
Do you feel like this has happened in this game so far?In post 173, Garmr wrote:I tend to break down even as town Albert and T-cold know this from past experience with me.
Your vote is on the weakest of the three reads here. Why?In post 180, Garmr wrote: zakk-probably scum I don't like any of his reasons.
Albert- Hasn't been helpful all game, Jumped on my wagon with little reasoning and just is irritating. Scum
-off my wagon i have GG as a slight scum read.
I understand the hestitation, but I've noticed you're not calling him town while arguing against the wagon.In post 191, ICEninja wrote:Garmr is all over the place. He's giving off noobtells left and right, which in a game with lots of experienced players, makes him an easy lynch.
So do we take it as a town tell or leave it as null?In post 201, Thor665 wrote:I actually think I agree with ABR there.
In post 281, zakk wrote: Also, I like to watch him squirm.
I actually had the opposite reaction.In post 301, ICEninja wrote:This put Slandaar higher on my scum list.Slandaar wrote: However, this game has a lot of suspects and so I am just going to remove myself from the pool later as I am town and this town needs obvtowns at this point. So, expect lots of content on interesting things.
I feel like he done this very early with Guthrie and Sir bastion on the first couple of pages(i.e. calling for quicklynches) but has since dropped his suspicion of them, which suggests to me that he was calling for their immediate lynches *without* being overly sure of their scumminess.In post 309, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Thor, the scummy part is where you don't have enough information to think Slandaar is scum, yet you push his lynch with a song on your lips.
In post 340, Thor665 wrote:I think you're all newbies, currently.
I feel like I'm the only one who even knows what he's saying.
and youIn post 370, Garmr wrote:The thor and slandaar back and forth hurts my head. I like how zakk jumps on the wagons with the most momentum. Notice how at the end of posts 249 and post 368 yet still hasn't released anything of substance. His sarcastic, trying to be funny but failing and just has thrown out heaps of fluff I'm quite happy with my vote. He was also trying to push a lynch on Thor with out offering anything to the case def scum.
I was'nt fully sheeping ABR for the record.In post 354, Thor665 wrote:No, you started this train, we're doing it. No backsies.
If there's one thing I remember about Slandaar, it's that he does this anyway.In post 395, ICEninja wrote:Slandaar seems to be following a trend of attacking the people who suspect him.
This is redonkulousIn post 479, Garmr wrote:@maxous
To anwser your post 391 which i just read after isoing.
I haven't stayed away from the Abr,SLaandar and Thor affair. I said it does my head in and I gave my opinions and it gives me a head ache that it continued aslong as it did.
Thor-null
Slaandar-null-town
and
Abr-scum
Which i said in the begging of this mess.
The only thing that has changed that I haven't mentioned is Thor's gone from null to town and that only happened in the last couple of posts which is after your question. You may of actually got most of these facts if you actually read what I was saying instead of being lazy.
You calling me scummy?In post 615, ICEninja wrote:And this actually makes me feel a little better about my decision.Maxous wrote: Barring something dramatic, i'll be voting Garmr or Thor at the end of the day period.
I'll wait and see where the replacements vote etc.
Because ABR is the obv lynch of the day, so if the town wants to, go ahead. Me ranting about Garmr is'nt gonna change that.In post 674, Thor665 wrote:Look at the vote count, look at the only other person voting the way you are - your case is going nowhere and it's doing it at lightning speed. Why are you okay with this?
Do you generally feel unmotivated when you have to fake a bunch of content??In post 707, Skelda wrote:Alright, I'm finally reading this. I've been putting it off due to lacking motivation, but I'm going to now. Expect a logical post from me soonish.
Slightly scummy. Looking for a reason to vote rather than looking for scum?In post 23, Garmr wrote: I'm more suspicious of Maxous who hasn't laid down a vote and is content on just calling people towny while fueling the flames between the two wagons.
UNVOTE: Alby boy, VOTE: Maxous
]EDWOP [/b
and he votes still through I find him suspicious for taking so long to vote and the way his just listing people as town so early in the game.
Slightly scummy.In post 44, Garmr wrote:Also your points on Tool are fluff lol the only one I could consider not fluff is the one about pretending to be clueless and that's not really to strong of a sign.
Slightly scummy. Weird excuse.In post 173, Garmr wrote:I'm trying to engage in one on one this round but i'm kinda failing. I'm not the best at defending myself from multiple people either as I tend to break down even as town Albert and T-cold know this from past experience with me.
Making a note of this reasoning for ABR-scum. It's all he ever gives.In post 180, Garmr wrote:Albert- Hasn't been helpful all game, Jumped on my wagon with little reasoning and just is irritating. Scum
This is when he ignored the ABR-Thor debate despite ABR being his strongest scum-read.In post 273, Garmr wrote:@Tcold
Just a couple of questions and then feel free to ask me some.
1.What do you think of the scuffle between Slandaar and Thor.(I know you think Thor is suspicious but can you point out certain points.)
2.Do you have any scum reads on people no one has mentioned and why?
3.What's your current read of Tool since you didn't like him earlier but you haven't mentioned him since. So what helped confirm/change your read on him.