Mini 1501: We're On A Boat! (END?! results inside)

Smudger · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:30 pm

@mod please fix that broken tag in Post #173

pitoli · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:31 pm

VOTE COUNT 1.5

Maestro:

fferyllt, Smudger, Kazekimaru

notscience:

Garmr

SleepyKrew:

notscience

Brian Skies:

ChannelDelibird, CrashTextDummie

Kazekirimaru

: YYR, SleepyKrew, Plum

Not Voting:

SpyreX, Maestro, Brian Skies

With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.

Time until deadline: (expired on 2013-10-17 00:00:00)

Mod Notes

: Yah I'll probably stop being anal about pagetops now

SleepyKrew · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:37 pm

And you think voting him will make him retroactively declare V/LA? I'm still seeing no benefit in voting him. In both scenarios you still disagree with, he'd post regardless of pressure. So that makes pressure votes on him useless.

Smudger · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:39 pm

In post 174, SleepyKrew wrote:So what, just by replacing out, Aero completely erased your scumread?

I think the first vote was unnecessary too but you're here at the moment and ffery isn't so I'm just talking to you. I think you should be voting who you think is scum. Which is apparently no one.

Not at all, you have replaced in and have begun by asking a lot of questions, I am engaging you by answering those questions. I remain suspicious of everyone in the game, I would be a fool not to. I have no strong read on anyone as scum right now I have suspicions of a few but there is not enough to go on to say to me who is and who is not voteworthy, this i would say remains the story for most D1s in every game I have played.

As for you thinking the vote was unnecessary then what do you want me to say, you are wrong? no, I will not, as that is your opinion and not mine. It is my vote and I choose to place it there giving reason as to why, if you find that reason questionable then by all means say so, which you have done, but I see no reason to move it right now.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:45 pm

Why were you voting Aero?

Smudger · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:51 pm

In post 95, Smudger wrote:I tend to agree with the observations here to an extent, but was not convinced on the Aeronaut wagon TBH as at the time of reading this post I was going to say that "I am currently of a mind to give benefit of doubt". But then I read some more, not liking the attitude at all

In post 168, Smudger wrote:With regard to the NS wagon, you are of course referring to Aero, do you understand why I voted for Aero? if not is was for his attitude more than anything

Smudger · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:52 pm

but then you could have done that, any reason why you did not?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:56 pm

So you were voting Aero for scummy behavior. Am I wrong that he was your top scumread? Yet when he replaced out, you dropped the scumread (and now have no real reads) and are doing a (useless) pressure vote.

Tell me if any of that is wrong please

SpyreX · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:15 pm

Not one but two espousing that the claim was an out of the gate mastermind plot?

If that was a scum maneuver, I'd put hard money cash on it being in direct response to the chucklewagon that predicated it. Even that is a far, far less likely then the truth when you've got an entire bag of lies as scum to choose from.

As for wanting AeroSK dead its a reaffirmation that while I'm not down with a 7 page lynch I'm super not down with the 50+ page nonsense I've seen the ~meta~ turn to even worse since I've been gone. So, we squeeze out what we need to and then go from there. I haven't been persuaded that an end of the day that isn't dead SK isn't a good death.

Before the end of the day, you can expect some serious notes, but for now, I'm being patience.

SpyreX · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:16 pm

*patient. THANK YOU SPELLCHECKER FOR YOUR HELP

SleepyKrew · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:19 pm

What more are you trying to squeeze out? You're just repeating the same stuff over and over. I can't be patient; I'm scheduled to die.

SpyreX · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:21 pm

The schedule isn't moving anywhere, not now.

If I knew what more I was looking for, I really wouldn't need to play now would I?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:39 pm

Thoughts on the Maestro and Kazs wagons?

SpyreX · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:45 pm

Maestro is on my purge by fire sheet, but its lazy for the moment. Kaze? Not buying it.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:54 pm

Why aren't you buying it? Do I need to fire the advertising department?

Smudger · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:17 pm

In post 182, SleepyKrew wrote:So you were voting Aero for scummy behavior. Am I wrong that he was your top scumread? Yet when he replaced out, you dropped the scumread (and now have no real reads) and are doing a (useless) pressure vote.

Tell me if any of that is wrong please

Currently I am not voting Aero, and reserve comment on whether I put it back based on how you play.

I have already answered with regard to my current vote and as I said then, I do not consider it useless as opposed to you. This is a matter of opinion and they differ, if you want me to love my vote because you think it useless then you have a bit of a wait with that.

Now please answer my question as I have answered yours.

Smudger · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:18 pm

That should read move my vote.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:41 pm

Uh sorry what question?

I need to figure out if Smudger is failtown or failscum
I'll sleep on it

fferyllt · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:05 am

In post 158, SleepyKrew wrote: fferyllt:
In post 123, fferyllt wrote:The game was making a fast transition out of RVS mode (thank fuck for that)
How come you didn't try to get us out of RVS?

What makes you think I didn't?

In post 126, fferyllt wrote:
Vote: Maestro
why

Thanks for asking. Because he's made two low-content posts so far, in the midst of a ton of content worth sorting.

fferyllt · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:13 am

SleepyKrew, why do you think my vote is a pressure vote?

Maestro · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Sun Sep 29, 2013 3:46 am

SK's got me figured out, gaiz

SleepyKrew · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:21 am

In post 193, fferyllt wrote:What makes you think I didn't?

Because you didn't. You didn't vote or do anything to attempt to progress the gamestate.

I think it's a pressure vote because he has no content and thus I have no read on him. Do you think he's scum?

In post 195, Maestro wrote:SK's got me figured out, gaiz

okay are you actually going to do anything or am I wasting my energy

notscience · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:22 am

SK- Why would we end the day on page 2 before everyone checked in?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:26 am

Good boy.

fferyllt · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:45 am

In post 196, SleepyKrew wrote:Because you didn't. You didn't vote or do anything to attempt to progress the gamestate.

I almost never vote during RVS. I do other stuff. And I think the stuff I do usually does help progress the game out of RVS. From my third post onward, I can think of one post that could be argued didn't progress the game state.

I think it's a pressure vote because he has no content and thus I have no read on him. Do you think he's scum?

The lack of content was meant to provoke thought and questions. I was a little disappointed prior to your post.

It's not often that I put a vote on someone I'm not interested in lynching. This is not such an occasion.