i'm not particularly convinced he's scum. his focus on me is odd, but i don't see anything inherently scummy about it. if a PV wagon doesn't happen, i'll probably move there as a compromise. *shrug*shadow wrote:why is everyone avoiding the Pog wagon?
In post 670, N wrote:nomennoun(in ancient Rome) the second name of a citizen, indicating his gens, as “GaiusJuliusCaesar.”
In post 675, N wrote:Nicol prismnounone of a pair of prisms used to produce and analyze plane-polarized light in a polarizing microscope.
I'll give you a claim.In post 667, PeaceBringer wrote:because while dopog may be scum, looks like kat/pv is as well... so not everyone avoiding dopog, just looking elsewhere...In post 666, Shadowy Poison wrote:why is everyone avoiding the Pog wagon?
You said I had scummy posts.
Why are you showing me Katsuki psots?In post 551, ooba wrote:PeregrineV (or) dopog - both have scummy posts - you pick between the two.
i really hate this sort of claim. mostly because it just reeks of leaving your options open.PV wrote:Claim: Confirm-able town PR
seriously?mit wrote:Dante: Seems to be making a good effort to scumhunt.
if they were, i wouldn't tell you.mit wrote:Are ooba's and your roles somehow connected?
More please.In post 679, PeregrineV wrote:Claim: Confirm-able town PR
At what point in the game were you when this vote seemed like a good idea?In post 674, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Shadowy Poison
That vote is good for now. I may reconsider it upon further reading.
I was going to vote Dante but MD is voting Dante and it's completely against policy for me to sheep MD.
Yeah you'd much rather votepark on someone getting replaced. I look forward to your analysis of Mitillos' replace in.In post 677, DeasVail wrote:Dopog is an ok lynch, but there's nothing exciting there for me.
All three of these townreads are lazy as fuck. Quote Dante's best scumhunting efforts, explain how giving well-reasoned justifications and being prepared to reevalute reads = town, and show your work on dopog.In post 680, Mitillos wrote:Dante: Seems to be making a good effort to scumhunt. Some fluff and useless posts here and there, but otherwise seems alright.
Read: Town.
DeasVail: Makes clear reads and well-reasoned justifications. Is prepared to re-evaluate his reads.
Read: Town.
dopog: Liking his posts reasonably well. Also goes to the townpile.
Read: Town.
It's day1, I'm L-4, how much more you looking for?
It's day1. I'm saying I'm a town PR. I'm saying I'm confirm-able as to that. I've now given you two additional pieces of information you did not have before to make an evaluation, so how does your post make any sense?In post 687, PeaceBringer wrote:that kind of claim is spurious and cuts out the town from further evaluation. It is bad precendence to let anyone off on "comfirable power role." Period.
I kind of get this, but want to hear a response from Dopog.In post 658, Nani wrote:Dopog:
First posts are wallotexts that look like a lot but don't say anything concrete, he voted Railtracer for pushing a wagon jokingly and then for being surprised about people scumreading that joke read. (115) Looks like a lot of contrieved reasons to call someone scum.
My problem is when I isoed him, the tone caught my attention:
In post 201, dopog wrote:Hi.Sorrynero the grammar in that last sentence was messed; didn't fully understand hehe.In post 204, dopog wrote:AhhsorryI'm just catching up nowyyy
But I'm getting into the mood again so that's coolIn post 333, dopog wrote:Hi.Sorry. Had to vote on saturday (haha) and then was super busy yesterday so couldn't post as I thought I would... : (In post 466, dopog wrote:Hi. Ermmmsorryfinding it hard to get back into the game after busyness. Think I may just post some of what I had down before;Mafia subconsciousness at his best. Town simply cares less about perceptions.In post 593, dopog wrote: That's kinda bumming - and yeah am a bitsorryfor that, but all a bit unanticipated.(
you were at l-1
nope I think I am momentarily confused...nevermind...In post 695, PeaceBringer wrote:you were at l-1
I think it's fine actually.In post 687, PeaceBringer wrote:that kind of claim is spurious and cuts out the town from further evaluation. It is bad precendence to let anyone off on "comfirable power role." Period.
In post 690, Shadowy Poison wrote:Yeah you'd much rather votepark on someone getting replaced. I look forward to your analysis of Mitillos' replace in.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
You can't complain about both me voteparking and moving my vote. It doesn't work that way. 1) Some links to all of the information you just gave me?In post 694, Mitillos wrote:1) @Shadow: Yes, they are lazy. But then, I did need to read through 27 pages and read 16 players, so what did you expect?
2) Re Dante: Post 55 (eliminate the WIFOM), his discussion with Nani (posts 638-645), some of his questions to Peace and Pere.
3) Re Deas: Giving well-reasoned justifications for your reads generally means they are coming from a town mindset (i.e. trying to find those who can be shown to be scum and convincing the rest of the town of this). Being prepared to reevaluate one's reads usually means you are open to arguments based on reasoning. This is also pro-town behaviour.
4) Re dopog: His posts with significant content (115 and 466) seem to me to be coming from a natural town thought process. Those are the ones I meant, when I said I liked his posts.
1) What's there to say? We're town, we're townposting, and you're either town who correctly spotted us townposting, or scum who already knew we were town.In post 694, Mitillos wrote:My town-read on you is equally lazy. 1) Any particular reason you skipped that? 2) What do you think of Pere's claim? 3) You gave some names in what I believe were scumreads, earlier. Were those in order of strength, or just arbitrary?
I wasn't doing that?In post 697, DeasVail wrote:You can't complain about both me voteparking and moving my vote. It doesn't work that way.