Board Games Mafia -- Game Over!

[IH]

1.Ecto, because you post your list of scum and such doesn't mean you can just refuse comments until others do the same....

2.

Scum-RR, Kison, Battle mage
probably town-Zindy, Thesp
Neutral-The other losers who didn't get mentioned.

[Ectomancer]

1.Ecto, because you post your list of scum and such doesn't mean you can just refuse comments until others do the same....

Sure it does. I can do whatever I want. There may be consequences, but still, I can do whatever I want. I see nothing wrong with refusing to answer a question regarding a list from someone who refuses to play along and post their list first. In fact, I see several reasons to

not

answer until they have committed themselves. I'm not going to allow them the luxury of adjusting their answers based upon my answers before they've set in writing what their original thoughts are. At least then, we will see the evidence of a change, or perhaps even prevent them from being able to dance their way out of something. You cant do that unless they first commit those ideas in writing. Do you see my point?

[Twito]

I decided to try to be useful in this game without reading too much of the secound day. RR claimed no result so he is scum. Thx.

Vote: RR

Or scum is trying to set me/him up but I'm believe in the scenario of RR being scum.
Olio is still scum.

[Glork]

Day Two: The Third Vote Count:

Kison 7 (IH, Cogito Ergo Sum, DragonsofSummer, Thesp, Ectomancer, HackerHuck, olio)
Twito 2 (Raging Rabbit, Kison)
Raging Rabbit 2 (Battle Mage, Twito)

16 alive, 9 to lynch.

[Zindaras]

Kison, claim. Now.

FoS: Twito

, too.

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm here, still real busy. No time to read in depth atm, so I mostly skimmed the last few pages. All the people calling me an idiot are welcome to continue enjoying themselves, but I'd like to kindly remind them that unless they disblieve my claim, it's not helping the town at all and isn't particulartly nice either.

I decided to try to be

useful

in this game without reading too much of the secound day. RR claimed no result so he is scum. Thx. Vote: RR

lol

Confirm vote: Twito

Also, I'm totally ok with a Kison lynch. The case against him is reasonably good, and I'd probably be voting him if it wasn't for my friend Twito. Claiming may be a good idea at this point, since he seems to be the consensually most suspiscious.

[Kison]

I was getting ready to claim anyways, but wanted to wait for one more vote before I did that, though...

I'm a

townie

, plain and simple.

[Zindaras]

...

And your board game?

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

Yeah, he's scum all right.

Let's string him up.

[Kison]

Monopoly. No role. Just lots of play money.

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

Greed = Scum.

Besides, Uncle Pennybags is too awesome to be a townie. I mean, he has a Monocle.

[Zindaras]

Vote: Kison

. I don't really believe that claim.

[Kison]

And as I realize that my lynching is pretty much inevitable, I'd like to point out that CES is rather anxious to get this done with. He hasn't even given a valid reason for why he's so anxious to hang me. It's rather hypocritical that I am criticized for placing a second vote on Twito with at least some reasoning, even if you all disagreed with it, while he posts about my lynching as if he hasn't even looked at why the wagon was formed:

Vote: Kison

(If I don't, Zindaras will vote for me.)

BS reason.

Now that we've determined we're lynching Kison, I'm asking the vig to take out Zind.

This is right after I gave my three Twito-for-scum reasons. No reason given why he did not like them.

Pst, Fritz, just say it's Kison.

Vigilante-kill request.

Yeah, he's scum all right.

And, still no reason given.

My list:

Possible Scum

:
CES, Twito, DoS

Possible Town

:
Ectomancer, HackerHuck

Unsure

:
Everyone else.

[Kison]

Vote: Kison

. I don't really believe that claim.

Perhaps you should explain why. If you obviously think I'm scum, why'd you bother asking for the claim? Trying to legitimize your reason for voting?

[Zindaras]

Perhaps you should explain why. If you obviously think I'm scum, why'd you bother asking for the claim? Trying to legitimize your reason for voting?

I wanted to see your claim because I was leaning towards you being scum, but unsure.

[Kison]

Perhaps you should explain why. If you obviously think I'm scum, why'd you bother asking for the claim? Trying to legitimize your reason for voting?

I wanted to see your claim because I was leaning towards you being scum, but unsure.

And what did you want me to claim? What did you expect?

[Zindaras]

I expected a claim and I got a claim. You haven't given off vibes for any specific role, to be honest.

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

You could, for example, have been a Mason. Asking for a claim previous to lynching is always good.

[Kison]

I expected a claim and I got a claim. You haven't given off vibes for any specific role, to be honest.

You said you were "unsure" of my being scum before my claim. My question is how does my claim make you any more sure? You're dancing around the question.

[Zindaras]

You said you were "unsure" of my being scum before my claim. My question is how does my claim make you any more sure? You're dancing around the question.

For one, that was not your question. For two, it didn't make me any more sure. I felt that the points raised by Ectomancer was good. I felt that your role's voting record isn't very good. I felt that it was enough to warrant a vote.

[Raging Rabbit]

Claiming townie without telling us his board game was

really

scummy, and Monopoly looks like the first thing he could come up with. I'd vote Kison since he's a very good lynch now imo, and Twito won't die today anyways, but I'm not sure whether or not that'll be the hammer and more people should probably have a chance to speak up before we end the day.

(Temp) unvote Twito, big FOS: Kison

.

[IH]

I'd say 24 hours for someone to come and try to counterclaim monopoly. After that, hammah.

Also, I do not believe Kison's claim myself, if only most claims are in the form of "name, role, Flavah here"

Kison just said his role. It was just kinda.... eh not good enough to believe.

Also I will repeat that I do not believe RR's claim.

In 24 hours I hope to see a =====[ ]

[Kison]

Just do it.

[Zindaras]

I'd say 24 hours for someone to come and try to counterclaim monopoly. After that, hammah.

What the?

If you think he's lying, you should just hammer him on the spot. Why should he have to be counterclaimed?

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

IH wants to out unnecessary role info, obv.