Not buying your claim at all!
Here is why...
MrBuddyLee wrote:I suppose if I'm busing Ozy, I should vote for him.
vote: Ozy
MrBuddyLee wrote:Why, for example, is no one commenting on the makeup of the Ozy lynch? The first thing I did when he came up townish was reread to see who made a scummy attempt to get Ozy lynched. I find it odd that kil and Patrick avoided making such comments.
Interesting eh? The person who was bussing ozy says he goes back after the ozy lynch to see who made an attempt to get ozy lynched, yet... who was it? The man in question.
MrBuddyLee wrote:Tell you what, it's obvious from kil's post that I have a night action, so I won't bother hiding that. I'll add that I may know why there was no NK last night. If you guys really want to push this, go for it, but I can only see it causing a huge mess. I'm going to go back to finding scum, and
I don't think kil or Ozy are it
, which narrows things a bit.
His claim says that he found ozy scummy enough to try and NK him that night, yet right here he says he thinks ozy is not scum. Why would you have tried to NK him and then have such a turn around that he is pro-town? He also says he thinks I am not scum. Funny, though because now he is pushing me as scum. Also, this looks a little like someone who just recruited trying to take heat of that person.
MrBuddyLee wrote:Problem is, there could be other explanations for the
lack of
nightkill besides my action. So I don't see any way to confirm me or the alignment of my target today.
1. Sounds like a doc claim to me, and yet he hasnt died at night. If he were not scum then scum would have wacked him.
2. Sounds a heck of a lot like someone who was trying to prevent a NK ot make one happen.
MrBuddyLee wrote:I really want to know who did that, but I don't think it's a good idea for them to step forward unless that was a 1-shot.
Why would you have wanted to know if you already knew and that it was you? This seems to appear pro-town with the connotation of saying, I didnt think Pat was that scummy, why did someone kill him?
MrBuddyLee wrote:Norinel wrote:Just one? I can think of three (doc protection, blocked scum, NK-immune target) off the top of my head using standard roles, two of which a tracker could partially confirm.
I'll operate on the most likely one til there's more evidence. There could definitely be another explanation but the odds for now favor me operating based on mine.
This comment doesnt jive at all with your claimed role.
MrBuddyLee wrote:I think geraint, klebian and Turbo are most likely to be scum. If we lynch those three I think we hit two and win, and if there's a vig, even better. Let's reach a consensus.
Again, the whole vig thing.
MrBuddyLee wrote:Definitely not excited about the people advocating wasting another lynch on Ozy. Sure, there's a chance he's scum, but is it likely? It's a play that doesn't make sense for protown players to push.
Again, protecting someone he tried to NK. Not to logical, unless of course you just recruited them to scum.
MrBuddyLee wrote:This game had a scum godfather, which is a pretty huge advantage for scum. I'd be surprised if they got an additional benefit from recruiting dead townies to their side.
I never mentioned recruiting townies to their side, you brought it up!
MrBuddyLee wrote:Autoload made the same play as town in a newbie game he replaced into. I'm thinking that as a newbie he has yet to understand the value of patience in these games.
His previous quote says we need to evaluate whether or not ozy is scum by his behavior, but when someone called auto scummy, he stuck up for him.
MrBuddyLee wrote:For Ozy to be unlynchable scum, we'd have to accept that the only way to kill him is to vig him. If the vig dies, Ozy would be unkillable.
Now, ozy is killed (SK'ed or Viged) strange that all along MBL has been saying that it was probably an SK who killed ozy, but now he himself is claiming to have killed ozy as a vig.???
MrBuddyLee wrote:Ozy was killed by a serial killer, I think. In retrospect, he was axed right after I expressed the difficulty scum would have in getting him killed, and I think an SK probably looked at that and said, "Shit, I can't win as long as that guy's in the game so he'd might as well go now." The alternate explanation is that town looked at him and suddenly decided he was the scummiest player in the game, and no one's remotely expressed that thought besides kil, who claims not to have killed Ozy. It looks like an SK dayvig kill.
So it's either two original scum plus one recruit plus an SK or two original scum plus one recruit vs a town with a vig. With Mert (godfather) dead and Ozy (recruit) dead, it's most likely there's a scum and an SK remaining.
Now, hold the reigns buddie, a few quotes ago, you said it would not be balanced if scum could recruit and here you go basically thinking they possibly could.
MrBuddyLee wrote:And why are you cleared in the least? Scum and SK will likely have powers in addition to killing ability. Your big theory is that I'm a mafia who can
kill and recruit
and yet you try to pretend like because you can track you can't kill?
Again, I never had that theory, that theory came from you! Freudian Slip eh?