For all I know there's an achievement for getting 5 pagegrabs.
Also, there is another achievement I get by having half the playerlist believe in fairies after I am dead, so I'm handing out favors now in exchange for promises to believe in fairies when I'm dead.
Who said that?
Chamber. It's all a conspiracy.
Or is it?
In post 752, Who wrote:For all I know there's an achievement for getting 5 pagegrabs.
Also, there is another achievement I get by having half the playerlist believe in fairies after I am dead, so I'm handing out favors now in exchange for promises to believe in fairies when I'm dead.
You have my (fairy-made) sword.
2011 scummies winner (BTS help) and participant;
coming back to Mafia...slowly. Keep an eye for me as a mod.
Also keep an eye for setup review requests.
Vote the one you feel sure will get you a scumflip, then <_<. So long as people know why you're voting for him or me it's not wrong to switch votes as either of us become more likely to flip.
In post 761, Sakura Hana wrote:Well let's go with this VOTE: DoctorPepper
Because for some reason I feel you want me toooooo much to vote VoidedMafia.
The fact that you only now locked in a vote after amrun hounded you on it is aggravating to say the least. Small points for the paranoia, but I just don't see why that took so long.
2011 scummies winner (BTS help) and participant;
coming back to Mafia...slowly. Keep an eye for me as a mod.
Also keep an eye for setup review requests.
I'm trying to figure out why my townreads were arguing, I have a reason for throwing a vote just now and on DP other than what I mentioned, but I can't mention why yet. Besides I do agree that I needed to put a vote somewhere I just didn't know on which of you two, did it on DP because Amrun has mentioned that she wanted me to vote you with her, and then kept pushing me to vote which made me think voting you would be a mistake, so that cleared up my mind and voted DP.
In post 704, Bulbazak wrote:Dr. Pepper, I think a lot of people have been complaining about the spam and then voting the spammers. It gets hard to remember if that is why they are voting that person or not. In this case, I think it's excusable. There's no need to immediately jump on the misconception and call it a misrep.
I will not deny that I've done that. But my point is that, other than his Sakura Hana not-scum read, his reads seem entirely based on only a part of the game--that being the spamming early on. The spam mainly ended around page 10 (other than a short spree by Who near the 20-page mark), and I simply haven't seen much progression in his reads beyond that issue.
To be honest, there's not been much progression for a lot of people, and in many ways, that's kinda understandable. We've only recently gained some ground after Sakura, so I don't think it should be too much of an issue going forward.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 673, DoctorPepper wrote:Idk about Bulbazak or Voided. Or maybe even Sakura. Something about them always insisting that you can get the spam achievement without spam is weird. It ENCOURAGES you to spam. In fact Bulb's statement about Who dying to give other people a chance at Spamalot AND subsequently saying that it can be achieved without spamming is sketchy.
However the amount of spam kinda makes this game hard to read :/ so idk
I believe Sakura's claim right now, I dont think she would have faked something like that.
It's the nature of the game. There's going to be more of the stuff that gets measured and gets rewarded. It's how people are wired. Harping on it the way you do is seriously bugging me given its relevance to scumhunting.
In post 680, Voidedmafia wrote:This is part of why I don't feel good about DP. Pretty much all of his non-fluff posts have mainly been on the topic of the Spamalot, and very little on anything else. The fact that, AFAIK, his reads are based almost purely on this point (sans his Sakura read) doesn't look like town trying to scumhunt or figure out the other players in general.
Taking apart a bad argument is not chainsawing. If you've got something more than "Argh! You disagree with me! You misrep!", then please enlighten me. If not, shut up.
Sorry, didn't see that.
Anyway, now that I have gotten the achievement I can reveal that it was all a lie: The real achievement was for getting all of you to believe in in fairies. Why did I lie? 3 reasons:
1. Much easier to get people to believe if all non-believers are scum.
2. There might have been an achievement for lying to get an achievement.
3. It was a reaction gambit to see if anyone attempted not to say it and then added a typo when they had to in the hopes that it wouldn't count with the typo.
In post 746, Amrun wrote:That isn't at all how I interpret his posts and he has more scumhunting than most of the game. You seemed to go into reading with a conclusion in mind and stretch the facts to fit.
I go in with a conclusion in mind, and then see if the facts reject or support that conclusion. In this case they supported it.
In post 727, Amrun wrote:I gave a townread on an I pressured DP, when asked for reads. That's so far away from White Knighting that it's ridiculous.
You essentially defended DP by attacking his attacker. If you were both scum, this would be chainsaw defending. However, I believe him to be town and you to be scum, which would make this white knighting.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
