Mini 399 - Meets His Maker Mafia - GAME OVER!

[IH]

FoS:Yamahako

btw.

[Adele]

If you had my role, you'd be furiously asking the moderator questions too.

Lol. That's really believable, though I wish you'd try to contribute to the game too.

wait... is IH a BabyJesus alt?

Pooky, you slut, why do you have 2 lovers? Or are there more?

fishery. I'd like to suggest Pooky

not

answer this question today.

klebian, you're at lynch-2. I guess if you don't want to get lynched, you might wanna do something about that.

[Twito]

wait... is IH a BabyJesus alt?

No.

Adele why did you change avatar?

[Adele]

QC's no longer my fave webcomic. The humour has gone radically downhill. I no longer wear glasses, and I've grown my hair out a lot so it no longer really looks like me... and I was very very very very very very very very bored with it.

[Twito]

And why did you choose this new one?
Yes it has many pretty and and possibly annoying bright colors on it but that also makes it easier to recognize.
So why was it?
*has the feeling this should be discussed somewhere else*

[klebian]

klebian, you're at lynch-2. I guess if you don't want to get lynched, you might wanna do something about that.

On reasoning that I don't feel sufficient enough at this point. The first 2 votes on me were seemingly random, yours was for not contributing (but I feel I am now contributing to this game), and I don't know what Yamahako meant by this sentence: "Why are you feeding this discussion aiming it toward the people who are actually contributing?"

Btw, Chamber and maybe dragyn_mage (definitely chamber) need prods.

[Adele]

klebian, you're at lynch-2. I guess if you don't want to get lynched, you might wanna do something about that.

On reasoning that I don't feel sufficient enough at this point.

Unfortuantely, that's not your call to make.

Yamahako (if I understand him correctly) is objecting to the way you're "contributing"at the moment (harsh quote marks there, but I'm not fully satisfied); if you look further into Yama's post for context it becomes clearer

Why are you feeding this discussion aiming it toward the people who are actually contributing? it seems counter productive -

we should be focusing on people who seem to be deliberately hiding something and being deceptice

So: he feels you're trying to pull more info out of contributors (asking me questions when I've been very upfront about everything but would obviously not like to give too much info away to scum) rather than focusing on people who are acting scummy by undercontributing (he names Pooky, which I somewhat disagree with).

And why did you choose this new one?
Yes it has many pretty and and possibly annoying bright colors on it but that also makes it easier to recognize.

Is recognisability bad?
When I was young, we had an Archimedes computer, on which we had a game of Taipei. I played it, but found many of the pictures on the tiles very similar and wanted something more discernable. I made bold, abstract tiles for the game in 24-colour, 60-by-50 or something Paint on that computer (I miss that program) and playede much better from then on. I liked the aesthetic of the tiloes I designed; this is possibly the earliest artwork I produced that I still have access to... in theory, anyway. We have an Arc emulator on this PC I'm now on but I don't know where it is. It's my intent to get my dad to show me, make up identical pictures in Paint and use those.
I designed this in about 10 minutes last night to do the job until then, when I'll cycle the picutres I made all those years ago (like, '93-ish)

[draygn_mage]

studying for an accounting exam will post content asap.

[Yamahako]

Yamahako (if I understand him correctly) is objecting to the way you're "contributing"at the moment (harsh quote marks there, but I'm not fully satisfied); if you look further into Yama's post for context it becomes clearer

Why are you feeding this discussion aiming it toward the people who are actually contributing? it seems counter productive -

we should be focusing on people who seem to be deliberately hiding something and being deceptice

So: he feels you're trying to pull more info out of contributors (asking me questions when I've been very upfront about everything but would obviously not like to give too much info away to scum) rather than focusing on people who are acting scummy by undercontributing (he names Pooky, which I somewhat disagree with).

Yeah... that's what I meant mostly. Sometimes the best defense is a good offense, sometimes a good offense looks scummy.

That's what I get for posting when I'm tired

[Twito]

Is recognisability bad?

No actually quite the opposite.
Your explanation for this avatar has been approved.

[Twito]

As far as the game goes I'm still happily voting Klebian and happy about it.
I'd like to repeat his request for prods.. well dragyn_mage just posted so only chamber I guess.

Mod:

Can we get a prod on chamber?

[Quagmire]

chamber has been prodded.

[klebian]

Yamahako (if I understand him correctly) is objecting to the way you're "contributing"at the moment (harsh quote marks there, but I'm not fully satisfied); if you look further into Yama's post for context it becomes clearer

Why are you feeding this discussion aiming it toward the people who are actually contributing? it seems counter productive -

we should be focusing on people who seem to be deliberately hiding something and being deceptice

So: he feels you're trying to pull more info out of contributors (asking me questions when I've been very upfront about everything but would obviously not like to give too much info away to scum) rather than focusing on people who are acting scummy by undercontributing (he names Pooky, which I somewhat disagree with).

Ok. I see now. So he says I am 'protecting' lurkers, such as pooky. I disagree with you that Pooky isn't undercontributing, however many people in this game could be classified as undercotributing, including me. However, yama points out that I wasn't calling out pooky, but that's kinda wrong. I did in this post:

This mason issue is difficult for me to understand; I see that Pooky visits people at night and if he doesn't visit you, you are told he was working. Pooky is refusing to settle anything, and this makes me believe that one of the 3 of you guys are scum. He may have implied earlier that there was something with you and him about masonry, but that may just have been continuing a joke, as someone noted. Pooky seems to not really want anyone voting him (SL's vote [which didn't even count] was met with a "How so?" when it was obvious that he hadn't posted to settle an issue that was ongoing at the moment), so there may be something up with him.

Now I see that pooky is 'furiously asking the moderator questions', so this can be excused somewhat...

At any rate, this game has really slowed. It's difficult to 'contribute' when no one else posts.

[Twito]

Maybe if Pooky gets some answers he could start contributing on the thread aswell..

[Penguins of the Serengeti]

We can lynch klebian if we're bored.

[ShadowLurker]

Mod:

Can we prod pooky

[Twito]

We can lynch klebian if we're bored.

Yeah and he seems to be scum on top of that.

[Adele]

We can lynch klebian if we're bored.

Yeah and he seems to be scum on top of that.

QFT, but everyone already

knows

the three of us feel that way, and don't appear to agree. Stalemate.

[Twito]

It's cuz they are all buddy-buddy with him and aren't ready to bus him yet. The lack of speed on this wagon just proves it being on scum. Just wait eventually they will realize they can't save him and will bus him. [hint]Now would be a good time to bus your scumbuddy klebian.[/hint]

[Penguins of the Serengeti]

Twito makes a good point. It's going to be very difficult for anyone to vote against anyone that's been early on a Day 1 scumwagon. If scum votes for klebian now, it might win them the game later.

[klebian]

It's cuz they are all buddy-buddy with him and aren't ready to bus him yet. The lack of speed on this wagon just proves it being on scum. Just wait eventually they will realize they can't save him and will bus him. [hint]Now would be a good time to bus your scumbuddy klebian.[/hint]

I don't have a clue what the hell you're talking about. I'm at -2...

[Adele]

Yes, but you've been static there for a long time, and the only people I've seen express issues with you recently are the three of us on your wagon.

[klebian]

But he was talking about the lack of speed on my wagon.

[IH]

OK, so is there a lynchworthy case on Klebian... cause I'm not seeing it...

FoS:Twito

for the moment.

[Adele]

OK, so is there a lynchworthy case on Klebian... cause I'm not seeing it...

Nothing intrinsically lynchworthy; he undercontributed and did some stuff that seemed kinda sketchy, I (for one) asked him to say something of substance, and so he upped his presence, happily posting fairly regularly, but nothing of any

use

.