Mini 408 - EXiLE Mafia, MOD ABANDONED

[Jack]

skruffs not ghyrt right?

[GreenLiquid]

Votecount

Cheesefan (0)
Skruffs (0)
JDodge (0)
Raging Rabbit (3)- Maz Medias, TCS, Romanus

fixed

Huh? I don't see any difference.

[Skruffs]

No it's okay, you can put Ghyrt up there

[Maz Medias]

No it's okay, you can put Ghyrt up there :P

I thought you were ready to take one for the team? :eyebrowraise:

[Cheesefan]

No it's okay, you can put Ghyrt up there

I thought you were ready to take one for the team? :eyebrowraise:

True story

[Raging Rabbit]

Our infallible mod is obviously trying to imply something...

[Jack]

Our infallible mod is obviously trying to imply something...

err, what?

[yellowbounder]

My initial impressions are required.

My nominations were JDodge and Skruffs, which means I feel kind of... what? Guilty? I'm not actually sure whether having sucessful nominations is a good thing or a bad thing.

Additional info can be misleading.

This town isn't a bunch of idiots, and is perfectly capable of deciding whether or not certain info is misleading. It's rather easier to do that after actually having said info, though.

Infomation is always good, because any information you gain in a mafia game (unless the mod is screwing with you), you take into account any scum that may be influencing the information, or trying to stop it, probably in this case. Good enough for me, for a

Vote: JDodge

.

Romanus seems kind of scummy. All he's done is talk about how nominations are a bad thing to reveal, then say he nominated RR twice, then he voted RR with not much justification.

I'm going to nominate you tommorow: Romanus

[JDodge]

Our infallible mod is obviously trying to imply something...

err, what?

I'm sure it's just another hare-brained scheme based on what he thinks the mod would do.

It's actually probably just a typo-like thing.

[JDodge]

Infomation is always good, because any information you gain in a mafia game (unless the mod is screwing with you), you take into account any scum that may be influencing the information, or trying to stop it, probably in this case. Good enough for me, for a Vote: JDodge.

It could be that I'm trying to keep people from basing their entire case on nominations.

[Jack]

Infomation is always good, because any information you gain in a mafia game (unless the mod is screwing with you), you take into account any scum that may be influencing the information, or trying to stop it, probably in this case. Good enough for me, for a Vote: JDodge.

It could be that I'm trying to keep people from basing their entire case on nominations.

Well, is it? Have you said this before?

[Raging Rabbit]

err, what?

That Ghyrt is scum. I was joking, though.

I'm sure it's just another hare-brained scheme based on what he thinks the mod would do.

It's actually probably just a typo-like thing.

If I was actually being serious there,

that

would've been outguessing the mod.

It could be that I'm trying to keep people from basing their entire case on nominations.

Why are you assuming everyone but you are idiots?

[Cheesefan]

hare-brained

Pun intended?

[Raging Rabbit]

*Blatant Advertising*

There's now a Mafia Strategy Thread discussing my game philosophy. Y'all may be interested in checking it out.

*/Blatant Advertising*

[JDodge]

hare-brained

Pun intended?

Yep.

[Cheesefan]

hare-brained

Pun intended?

Yep.

Hmm

Vote: JDodge

Such a joke cant go unpunished:P

[Skruffs]

I said I will take one for the team, unless we find an obvious scum nominated amongst us, and I *will*. The obvious implication is that Ghyrt is not on our team, because he's scum, OBVOBV. (Get with it people!!)

The one thing that *Does* irk me about RR is that he tends to 'side up' with people in favor with town but is just as quick to chastize and be suspicious of them. The way he's been regarding me this entire game is interesting, for example, saying he knows I am good with numbers one post and then saying that I'm scummy for offering martyrism the next. He does it with other people too, and there's nothing wrong with it, except it makes me wary to take him at face value: Is he being genuine or is he just setting me up for something? It doesn't mean he's scummy, it meanas I have to take extra care in reading his posts because I don't know what he's really saying, sometimes.

Actually I have no idea.

Let's assume that fircoal nominated me and someone who isn't eligible for lynching today. That puts me at four, tied with Bunny and Clown. (I do have a graph but it has to wait until tonight, I"m at work right now, sorry)

In thte meanwhile, here's a 'votes for' tally as supplied by all of us...
------------------------------------
Nominated:
*Dodge 5
*CheezFan 4
*RR 4
*skruffs 3 (+1)

Dead:
!FirCoal 2

Neither:
Maz 2
jack 1
CenScru 1
dean: 0
romanus: 0
yellowbounder 0
ghyrt 0

(One of the 'neithers' has an additional vote from Fircoal)

I have to go back and figure out why each person purportedly voted for who they did.. my graph displays who everyone voted for, too, which is fairly interesting.
If I were to nominate someone entirely on nominational data, I would suggest Dean and Ghyrt for tomorrow. But why can wait until later!
Discuss amongst yourselves. (I'm phklemphed)

[Skruffs]

Side note : POwer roles relevant to nominations
It's possible there are other power roles out there, too - everyone saying who they nominated clears most possibilities, though, like a nomination blocker, a nomination 'switcher'. There could be a nomination cop. Well hold on, there could be a blocker or switcher; if there is, they targetted someone who didn't nominate one of the current nominees.

[JDodge]

Side note : POwer roles relevant to nominations
It's possible there are other power roles out there, too - everyone saying who they nominated clears most possibilities, though, like a nomination blocker, a nomination 'switcher'. There could be a nomination cop. Well hold on, there could be a blocker or switcher; if there is, they targetted someone who didn't nominate one of the current nominees.

And that is

exactly

why I was saying that this information could be misleading.

Glad someone gets it.

[Raging Rabbit]

The one thing that *Does* irk me about RR is that he tends to 'side up' with people in favor with town but is just as quick to chastize and be suspicious of them.

Nothing in this world is only black or white, not even bunnies. I personally think this kind of open mindedness is the pro town way to go - people who continually side up with one guy for no good reason are probably either stupid masons or scum.

...saying he knows I am good with numbers one post and then saying that I'm scummy for offering martyrism the next.

You still haven't explained the logic behind said martyrism, btw. Any particular reason for that?

it meanas I have to take extra care in reading his posts because I don't know what he's really saying, sometimes.

If by "irking" you I'm making you pay more attention to may posts, well, I'm sorta happy to be so irk-y.

Nominated:
*Dodge 5
*CheezFan 4
*RR 4
*skruffs 3 (+1)

Dead:
!FirCoal 2

Neither:
Maz 2
jack 1
CenScru 1
dean: 0
romanus: 0
yellowbounder 0
ghyrt 0

No idea what to make of this. You're the math whiz, though.

What's your opinion on our friend Romanus, incidentally?

And that is exactly why I was saying that this information could be misleading.

Glad someone gets it.

What

I

don't get is why you assumed you were the only one who'd ever take such an option into account.

[GreenLiquid]

Prodding various players who haven't posted recently.

[DeanWinchester]

I totally got prod because I didn't post in 48 hours. and I got four pages to read. Man being busy and trying to play and keeping up with this thread is so hard.

[Romanus]

So, yellowbounder, you just bound in and cast even more suspicion onto me, just great, but remember. You can nominate me once, but I can nominate you twice

So there

[DeanWinchester]

Hmmm....
To Cheesefan: so I missed a plant, frankenberry, and now I have demonic clown to look at? I want Harry back ... I mean Lennon.
To Rabbit: I think your play style is fine and I don't care how much you cuss or attack poeple, because attacking poeple is what the game is about. 8)
To skruffs: Why me on nominational Data. Just asking cause I don't see how we could gleen scumness from the data we have right now. But I'm stupid so that simply might be it.

I think this game is getting very side tracked.
We need to figure out:
1. who we are going to lynch?
2. Are we working as a group to figure out nominations or randomly vote hoping the scum looking poeple get up there?

I absolutely think we need to work together for nominations. If all of the town votes the same two poeple we should be able to get the two poeple we want up there, and this will help flush out what other kind of vote manipulation roles are out there.

As for whom to nominate:
Maz Medias
Ghyrt
Romanus

They all seem incredibly scumie to me and none of them have done much, but gone after the rabbit to the point where I think they are all absolutely working together. I know that this is who the rabbit wants, but I would be going after them anyway because of there play.

BTW: I totally wanted the third eye on me and got so dissed be the rabbit and you never did explain the whole thumb and gun thing.

[Skruffs]

I personally think Romanus could have lied about his nominations and gotten away with it, if he was scum. Is that wifomy? Maybe.

JDodge, it's better to discuss the information and decide something, than to not and go based purely on play style. We're lowering the chances of a mislynch by comparing notes, I thinkI had no idea you would have five votes on you until I tallied them up... and if everyone randomly distributed ( which of course isn't the case ) than everyone would roughly have two votes on them. It's not the case. If there was a a'nomination cop' they would know now if who they followed last night was telling the truth or not; who would be lying? Everything tallies up. A nomination switcher honestly doesn't make much sense, flavor rise - a nomination blocker does. This information is there to be examined by anyone; why does bringing it into the open more likely harm us?

Bunny, I always try to read everyone evenly - if someone is 'running distraction' I spend more time hopping after them and less time following more substantial clues that could possibly lead to more information.