Open 512: See Nine Plus Plus (Game Ovah)

oriole · Post Post #1850 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:08 pm

Are you talking about the ISOs I completed more than 1000 posts ago? I said in a conclusion that I think Titus is more likely than Varsoon to be mafia. It's not very current. I'd have to go through it again.

Titus · Post Post #1851 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:09 pm

In post 1847, CherryDrPepper wrote:Not a misrep, prove me that you haven't been going after the PRs.

Saki threatens to claim at L-1 > You jump on him to make him claim
Varsoon CC's and you keep ging after Saki, then you go after Varsoon.
Varsoon retracts and you go after JMO.
I mention i'm a PR and you go after me.

1) Like I said, Saki wanted to claim.
2) I knew one of the CCers was lying and it was in the town's best interest to know which one.
3) I voted JMO because he's scummy.
4) I might buy you are a scum PR but I fosed you well before this PR business. Didn't you also claim that you crumbed your alignment or some garbage? Yeah, don't think you claimed PR. You claimed WIFOMING PR.

@Oriole, feel free to.

Saki · Post Post #1852 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:11 pm

In post 1851, Titus wrote:1) Like I said, Saki wanted to claim.

Do you really want me to link that to you again
when will you shut up about it

Saki · Post Post #1853 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:11 pm

btw while we're talking about rolefishing Titus also fished for Varsoon's role multiple times

Titus · Post Post #1854 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:13 pm

In post 1852, Saki wrote:
In post 1851, Titus wrote:1) Like I said, Saki wanted to claim.
Do you really want me to link that to you again
when will you shut up about it

You can't argue that I was rolefishing by voting you and then tell me to shut up about my defense.

Does Bo Know · Post Post #1855 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:14 pm

Votecount 1.58

[L-2] Varsoon - Dyslexicon, Flench, jmo16mla, CherryDrPepper, Paschendale
[L-4] jmo16mla - StubbsKVM, Xiao Long, Varsoon
[L-6] CherryDrPepper - Titus
[L-6] Titus - Saki

Not Voting: Bulbazak, TunnelVision, oriole

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch!

Deadline is Friday, August 2nd, 2013 at 7:30 PM CST ((expired on 2013-08-02 19:30:00)).

---

CherryDrPepper · Post Post #1856 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:14 pm

Then why are you painting a PR as scum hmmm?

Answer: Rolefishing.

Saki · Post Post #1857 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:15 pm

In post 1854, Titus wrote:
In post 1852, Saki wrote:
In post 1851, Titus wrote:1) Like I said, Saki wanted to claim.
Do you really want me to link that to you again
when will you shut up about it
You can't argue that I was rolefishing by voting you and then tell me to shut up about my defense.

you specifically said you wanted me to claim
so yeah how is that not rolefishing.

Saki · Post Post #1858 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:16 pm

In post 1857, Saki wrote:
In post 1854, Titus wrote:
In post 1852, Saki wrote:
In post 1851, Titus wrote:1) Like I said, Saki wanted to claim.
Do you really want me to link that to you again
when will you shut up about it
You can't argue that I was rolefishing by voting you and then tell me to shut up about my defense.
you specifically said you wanted me to claim
so yeah how is that not rolefishing.

I expected you to hold on to your vote and Flench and jump on him next post he made--you had such a strong scumread on him.

Titus · Post Post #1859 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:17 pm

In post 1856, CherryDrPepper wrote:Then why are you painting a PR as scum hmmm?

Answer: Rolefishing.

No. You're claiming you're a random PR. I've always felt you are scummy. It's not rolefishing to claim someone who claims PR is scummy. If I had started FoSing you AFTER you suggested you were a PR, the scenario might be different. However, I FoSed you well before that point.

Titus · Post Post #1860 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:18 pm

@Saki, the context was that I perceived you as wanting to claim so I made it happen. You can bring up the same argument over and over but the answers aren't going to change.

Saki · Post Post #1861 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:18 pm

In post 1859, Titus wrote:You're claiming you're a random PR. I've always felt you are scummy.

should I dig up the post where you said Varsoon was town for doing that

Saki · Post Post #1862 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:19 pm

In post 1860, Titus wrote:@Saki, the context was that I perceived you as wanting to claim so I made it happen. You can bring up the same argument over and over but the answers aren't going to change.

I already told you that I was not saying I wanted to claim.
Stop using it as a defense to justify your actions.

Please.

Saki · Post Post #1863 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:19 pm

In post 1862, Saki wrote:
In post 1860, Titus wrote:@Saki, the context was that I perceived you as wanting to claim so I made it happen. You can bring up the same argument over and over but the answers aren't going to change.
I already told you that I was not saying I wanted to claim.
Stop using it as a defense to justify your actions.

Please.

IF that misrep wasn't enough you're continually misrepping me by using it as a defense over and over again.

Titus · Post Post #1864 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:20 pm

In post 1863, Saki wrote:
In post 1862, Saki wrote:
In post 1860, Titus wrote:@Saki, the context was that I perceived you as wanting to claim so I made it happen. You can bring up the same argument over and over but the answers aren't going to change.
I already told you that I was not saying I wanted to claim.
Stop using it as a defense to justify your actions.

Please.
IF that misrep wasn't enough you're continually misrepping me by using it as a defense over and over again.

It's not a misrep to say I perceived you as wanting to claim so I did what I did.

CherryDrPepper · Post Post #1865 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:21 pm

Wow almost 2000 posts on D1...

CherryDrPepper · Post Post #1866 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:22 pm

Titus, if he wanted to claim he'd have done it before you voted him, because I did tell him he could claim without being at L-1, you wanted to FORCE him to play.

CherryDrPepper · Post Post #1867 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:22 pm

*claim

Saki · Post Post #1868 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:23 pm

In post 1864, Titus wrote:
In post 1863, Saki wrote:
In post 1862, Saki wrote:
In post 1860, Titus wrote:@Saki, the context was that I perceived you as wanting to claim so I made it happen. You can bring up the same argument over and over but the answers aren't going to change.
I already told you that I was not saying I wanted to claim.
Stop using it as a defense to justify your actions.

Please.
IF that misrep wasn't enough you're continually misrepping me by using it as a defense over and over again.
It's not a misrep to say I perceived you as wanting to claim so I did what I did.

I'm telling you to stop using it as a defense to justify your action.

Titus · Post Post #1869 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:24 pm

In post 1868, Saki wrote:
In post 1864, Titus wrote:
In post 1863, Saki wrote:
In post 1862, Saki wrote:
In post 1860, Titus wrote:@Saki, the context was that I perceived you as wanting to claim so I made it happen. You can bring up the same argument over and over but the answers aren't going to change.
I already told you that I was not saying I wanted to claim.
Stop using it as a defense to justify your actions.

Please.
IF that misrep wasn't enough you're continually misrepping me by using it as a defense over and over again.
It's not a misrep to say I perceived you as wanting to claim so I did what I did.
I'm telling you to stop using it as a defense to justify your action.

You're telling me to stop using my beliefs to defend my actions?!?!?

Xiao Long · Post Post #1870 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:26 pm

This is getting out of control. I'm not really comfortable with lynching Titus based on the thought that he could be scum buddies with Varsoon. Most of the time when you try to figure out scum teams when there hasn't even been a flip, you just end up being dead wrong.
I also think it's weird how you guys are completely against the possibility of Jmo/Varsoon being scum together. If one of them flips, don't rule the other out.

Also, calm down with rolefishing allegations. There's a difference between verifying claims or trying to figure out alignments and rolefishing.

Xiao Long · Post Post #1871 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:30 pm

In post 1862, Saki wrote:
In post 1860, Titus wrote:@Saki, the context was that I perceived you as wanting to claim so I made it happen. You can bring up the same argument over and over but the answers aren't going to change.
I already told you that I was not saying I wanted to claim.
Stop using it as a defense to justify your actions.

Please.

No one forced you to claim except yourself. You even put yourself at L-1 to do it, for some reason. You seem to forget the attitude you had at the time. You were very much daring people to make you claim, and it DID look like you wanted to claim.

jmo16mla · Post Post #1872 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:36 pm

flench

you just made this grand case against titus... and you didnt vote for him.. Why so?

Saki · Post Post #1873 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:40 pm

In post 1871, Xiao Long wrote:
In post 1862, Saki wrote:
In post 1860, Titus wrote:@Saki, the context was that I perceived you as wanting to claim so I made it happen. You can bring up the same argument over and over but the answers aren't going to change.
I already told you that I was not saying I wanted to claim.
Stop using it as a defense to justify your actions.

Please.
No one forced you to claim except yourself. You even put yourself at L-1 to do it, for some reason. You seem to forget the attitude you had at the time. You were very much daring people to make you claim, and it DID look like you wanted to claim.

If I were daring people to make you claim then why did Titus want to?

newp I was frustrated as hell at town

@JMO
he did it's in the middle of his post.

Saki · Post Post #1874 (ISO) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:41 pm

In post 1869, Titus wrote:
In post 1868, Saki wrote:
In post 1864, Titus wrote:
In post 1863, Saki wrote:
In post 1862, Saki wrote:
In post 1860, Titus wrote:@Saki, the context was that I perceived you as wanting to claim so I made it happen. You can bring up the same argument over and over but the answers aren't going to change.
I already told you that I was not saying I wanted to claim.
Stop using it as a defense to justify your actions.

Please.
IF that misrep wasn't enough you're continually misrepping me by using it as a defense over and over again.
It's not a misrep to say I perceived you as wanting to claim so I did what I did.
I'm telling you to stop using it as a defense to justify your action.
You're telling me to stop using my beliefs to defend my actions?!?!?

yeah, scum.