Mini 396: ChatMafia Mafia; GAME OVER

[Jack]

"Don't lynch me, I might have stopped a kill! Somehow!"

[Y]

Now, we all know the facts, we don't need to keep going over them, as Y seems so much to enjoy doing. Either lynch me or give me one more night to prove myself, but either way it is doing the town no good to just sit here paying only attention to me - either lynch me or don't and lets move on with the game.

As opposed to some of you, I can't just kill some one. I actually have to persuade people to a lynch for that...

By the way, the "Maybe I didn't kill anybody by not sending a picture" is just the other side of my theory that a painting could get some one killed.
Maybe AH did send a picture, which will become a kill next night, but since it didn't appear at dawn, he preferred to say he didn't send it.

I'm not saying any of that is true, I'm just posting my thoughts.

And since AH asked for it so nicely, here's a theory that has nothing to do with him:
We had no kill. This is interesting, since usually there is a mafia group and a SK. Having no kills means that possibly we're lacking one of those (SK, since we did lynch a mafioso), maybe one of them isn't active and there's the very improbable chance of both of them getting stopped some how. It's hard for me to believe that some one who can kill didn't at least try to. Any thoughts?

[AngusHutchsky]

I have no extra information, but it is odd that when I didn't send in my picture, nothing else happened either. It could also be purely coincadence(sp?), I was just pointing it out.

Ah so your not claiming it your just pointing out the coincidence?

Yes.

"Don't lynch me, I might have stopped a kill! Somehow!"

You're putting words in my mouth, I did not use it as an excuse, I simply pointed it out. You are so convinced that I am Mafia that you are not even considering the possibility that I am trying to help the town.

[Jack]

Why did you point it out?

[AngusHutchsky]

...and it's also worth mentioning that I don't believe anyone would be given a role whose sole purpose is to confirm their innocence. There's gotta be more to it (which wouldn't make sense given the nature of the claimed role).

There could be more to it than I was told - in fact, I may have accidentally blocked the kill last night by not sending in a picture.

If you read my post, you will see that it was in response to ChannelDelibird.

[Y]

AH: You asked for some new topic that doesn't involve you, but you're ignoring my post (Including what I said about you).

Does anybody have any new thoughts? We're not going anywhere...

[AngusHutchsky]

We had no kill. This is interesting, since usually there is a mafia group and a SK. Having no kills means that possibly we're lacking one of those (SK, since we did lynch a mafioso), maybe one of them isn't active and there's the very improbable chance of both of them getting stopped some how. It's hard for me to believe that some one who can kill didn't at least try to. Any thoughts?

I certainly agree with your last statement, and I think it's more likely that they are inactive than that they both got blocked on the same night, and there is still the possibility that my role somehow is involved in the killing process (or lack thereof). This being only a 12 player game, there is also the possibility that one of them doesn't exist.

[Jack]

I don't think we're getting anywhere.

[Twito]

There are many possible scenarios. Docs, RB's, UNK townies, hideable townies, scum not sending in nightkills.. I don't really see where this conversation is going either.

[Twito]

Twito away for the weekend.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... start=1500

[al_kohaulec]

al_kohaulec: Here is a mostly, but not quite, uneventful

Vote Count:

AngusHutchsky

- 4 - Jack, Twito, Y, ChannelDelibird

Y

- 1 - AngusHutchsky

Those who have forgotten they're in the chat room

- 6 - milkman, AniX, HurriKaty, Coron, Zindaras, draygn_mage

11 in the room, so 6 to kick somebody out of the chat.

Tenative deadline set for Feb. 25 8 PM PST.

[Jack]

I think we should just lynch angus. We're just twiddling our thumbs here.

[ChannelDelibird]

I think we should just lynch angus. We're just twiddling our thumbs here.

QFT. I can't see there being a better lynch.

[Coron]

VOTE: Y

[Twito]

Whoohoo! Twito is back! PAAAARTYYYY!
I feel kinda tired so I'll read the new posts tomorrow.. hey wait a secound..?!

[HurriKaty]

I think we should just lynch angus. We're just twiddling our thumbs here.

I hate to just be echoing someone else (again), but its true. After the chance we gave him, I don't see how giving him ANOTHER chance would be benificial to the game, especially seeing how easy it would've been for him to just prove himself night 1.

Vote: AngusHutchsky

[al_kohaulec]

al_kohaulec: JS#F*(#LJj
al_kohaulec: I mean

Vote Count:

AngusHutchsky

- 5 - Jack, Twito, Y, ChannelDelibird, HurriKaty

Y

- 2 - AngusHutchsky, Coron

Those who have forgotten they're in the chat room

- 4 - milkman, AniX, Zindaras, draygn_mage

11 in the room, so 6 to kick somebody out of the chat.

Tenative deadline set for Feb. 25 8 PM PST.

[AngusHutchsky]

...again, if I die, lynch Y tomorrow.

[Y]

...again, if I die, lynch Y tomorrow.

Unless I get NKed for getting you lynched, of course.

We've heard nothing from AniX (And I believe the same is true for whom he replaced).

[al_kohaulec]

Yes, I am aware of the AniX issue and am trying to resolve that as well.

I may extend the deadline for replacement purposes.

[Zindaras]

Post within 24 hours.

Hopefully.

[HurriKaty]

AniX actually suffers from a horrible, crippling disease known as chronic lurkitis.

Its sad, really.

[Twito]

I'd also like to hear from AniX as I did find StallingChamp who he replaced fairly scummy.

[Zindaras]

Okay, let's take a look at this stuff. Now, I decided to take a long hard look at Twito. What I noticed is that he didn't start off voting Masterchief, who I've noticed to be his usual random vote. I also noticed that he completely avoided weighing in on the Angus issue. I don't really like his first milkman FoS in 166 either. I keep noticing some scumbuddy vibes between Jack and Twito. 207 is a good example of this, and I believe Jack was really eager to vote StallingChamp when he voted Twito earlier as well. He starts to look better later on, when he appears to put time in the game. Something that I noticed was Jack's MC vote in 330. I think the town thing to do after the absence of a painting was to FoS Angus. Jack's and Twito's votes, therefore, look bad to me. Y's vote doesn't make me happy either.

CDB's looking pretty townish. Dragy gave off town vibes in his early discussion with Angus, but 70 made me feel bad about him, and he left his vote on me for a loooong time, which I still find odd. Jack and Katy still look bad to me over the Angus-wagon. For some reason, I feel that StallingChamp is town, though I find the absence of any 11th Houring somewhat disturbing. Y's vote in 283 sets off minor pings. Katy looked real bad but the way she's been posting lately has me thinking she's town.

Summary of opinions:

Towny: Katy, CDB.
Scummy: Y, Twito, Jack.

Coron needs to post a lot more. Something akin to actual thoughts. AniX needs to get off his lazy ass and make us all blanch in fear of Scully and The 11th Hour. I'd like some more detailed stuff from dragyn and milkman.

Vote: Jack

[Jack]

I don't like Zindaras defense of angus. It looks like either defending scum buddy or "see guys I told you he was innocent".