Keys Myaths wrote:Well, you're better than a random vote for me.
Lots of peole seem to dislike my vote on pevergreen (I'm on 6 votes atm), none of them has yet to explain exactly why that is. What's wrong with my logic?
For the win.Raging Rabbit wrote:Thanks.
What's ftw?
I don't accept your explanation for the FOS. FOS means Finger of Suspicion and I don't see how me spamming is suspicious meaning that you ain't really hunting scum.Raging Rabbit wrote:Btw, Twito - DP seems to find you scummier than I do, why address my FOS but not his vote?
Also, if you accept my explanation for the FOS, why are you still voting me?
I dislike with logic behind that vote aswell. But your wagon is idd growing so nice and fast that I'm getting suspicious about it.Raging Rabbit wrote:Lots of peole seem to dislike my vote on pevergreen (I'm on 6 votes atm), none of them has yet to explain exactly why that is. What's wrong with my logic?
It is a bit suspicious since you pushed it hard enough for people to start following you (DP's point, basically), but I mostly figured it was just threatning enough to get you to stop. It's not like a page 3 FOS is that big a deal.Twito wrote:I don't accept your explanation for the FOS. FOS means Finger of Suspicion and I don't see how me spamming is suspicious meaning that you ain't really hunting scum.
True. You also have no real way to defend yourself other than saying it's a joke now that I think of it, you I'll concede the point.Twito wrote:DP's explanation for his vote however makes sence if he is seeing me and IH triade for the first time
Twito wrote:I dislike with logic behind that vote aswell.
It is growing rather uncomfortably fast, yes.Twito wrote:But your wagon is idd growing so nice and fast that I'm getting suspicious about it.
Try to keep our other games out of this one, please. I promise to try as well.Twito wrote:Then again you are gonna tell me I can't possibly be suspicious of people joining wagon in which I'm already in but that's just bullshit.
Err, no. I'm voting him for jumping on what looked liked the start of a wagon, and he doesn't have the "It's a joke!" excuse since he isn't a part of that joke.ac1983fan wrote:Unvote
fos:RR
the way u are acting, it is like you are scum. you are trying to get someone lynched for trying to fit in???
I'd explain the difference since I think it's very distinct, but don't feel too much like quoting other games either. Until we know each other's alignment there it's also not too useful to draw information from that game, IMO.Twito wrote:We are not starting fresh from 0 info. I have played with plenty of people here before and I'm not ignoring the information that provides me with. It's not unfair information coz everyone here is able to read past games if they wish.
I'm however not going to quote ongoing games or something stupid like that, don't worry.
I'm not referring to any game in particular.Raging Rabbit wrote:I'd explain the difference since I think it's very distinct, but don't feel too much like quoting other games either. Until we know each other's alignment there it's also not too useful to draw information from that game, IMO.Twito wrote:We are not starting fresh from 0 info. I have played with plenty of people here before and I'm not ignoring the information that provides me with. It's not unfair information coz everyone here is able to read past games if they wish.
I'm however not going to quote ongoing games or something stupid like that, don't worry.
I'm not referring to only you in particular. You taking this so personally is rising my scumwibes about you again.Raging Rabbit wrote:Generally speaking, nothing wrong with that. We don't have any completed games with each other, though.
Twito wrote:I'm not referring to only you in particular. You taking this so personally is rising my scumwibes about you again.
What's this, then?Twito wrote:Then again you are gonna tell me I can't possibly be suspicious of people joining wagon in which I'm already in but that's just bullshit.
I'd really like you to show me how I'm bullying Twito, otherwise I'm gonna count this as another no-logic vote. I don't think it's even possible to actually be bullied through the interent, unless you have a real weak character and I assure you Twito's very stubborn. Also, I'm sure he doens't want you as his bodyguard.BM wrote:ffs, im getting damn sick of these stupid arguments between Raging Rabbit and Twito. Im sure that one oif them is Mafia-possibly both, in opposing groups. I'm going to Unvote, Vote: Raging Rabbit, because i generally dislike the way he almost bullies Twito.
I'm actually just playing mafia which doesn't really have anything to do with personal feelings. I'm not pissed off at you, don't worry. I will only lynch you if I think you are scummy.Raging Rabbit wrote:I'm pretty sure you're just pissed off at me for reasons that have nothing to do with this game. Do you honestly want BM as your bodyguard? You hate the guy...Twito wrote:I actually feel bullied, have a real weak character and want a bodyguard.
We have seen those lead to lynching scum.IH wrote:Yep. Not trying to stop a mindless bandwagoning lynch at all from people not explaining their logic.
nope.
Not at all.
= )
Sick of arguing about stupid things. Lets lynch one.BM wrote:ffs, im getting damn sick of these stupid arguments between Raging Rabbit and Twito. Im sure that one oif them is Mafia-possibly both, in opposing groups. I'm going to Unvote, Vote: Raging Rabbit, because i generally dislike the way he almost bullies Twito.