Open 512: See Nine Plus Plus (Game Ovah)

[Saki]

I thought L-1 would attract more players than what it just did.

Or did it go by too fast?

But is lurking through L-1 (possibly even an entire day) indicative of alignment?

P-Edit:: wb Pasche, and no I will not let you down.
P-Edit2:: DAMMIT PASCHE LEMME POST

[Saki]

Though I don't have reason to lynch lurkers as much as I have to lynch someone from the pool of Cherry, Varsoon, and Titus.

[Paschendale]

I don't like this whole claim situation. Saki, you shouldn't have put yourself into this situation, and I don't think your supposed tests and gambits are any good. All you've done is prove yourself a liability and a target. I hope you are fakeclaiming, and that you're really a VT, so you can lure away a night kill.

Titus, why Flench and not Glass? Make your case.

[Does Bo Know]

Votecount 1.14

[L-5] Saki - Flench, Varsoon
[L-5] CherryDrPepper - Dyslexicon, oriole
[L-5] jmo16mla - Glass, StubbsKVM
[L-6] Glass - jmo16mla
[L-6] Flench - Titus

Not Voting: Vote Me, TunnelVision, CherryDrPepper, Paschendale, Saki

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch!

Deadline is Friday, August 2nd, 2013 at 7:30 PM CST ((expired on 2013-08-02 19:30:00)).

---

[Saki]

ACTUALLLY never mind. Reconsidering scumread priorities.

Scum #1.
Flench.

Scum #2.
Jmo.

Scum #3.
one of (CherryDP, Varsoon, Titus)

VOTE: Flench

P-EDIT : I don't like it either, Pasche, but I don't think what I'm doing is going to hurt the town in the end. Construction of Flench-scum case in progress

[oriole]

I was basing the whole rarity thing off of just the odds rolling one of each. Looking a bit further, I think Mason might actually be rarest (because it requires two Ms). Still think it's an actual claim, though.

@Saki, Can you prove anyone was lurking through the L-1? It was pretty short.

[Saki]

Can't prove that anyone was lurking through the L-1 specifically but can prove that people were lurking throughout the entire time I was being pressured.

[Saki]

which is imo stil scummy.

[Titus]

I don't like this whole claim situation. Saki, you shouldn't have put yourself into this situation, and I don't think your supposed tests and gambits are any good. All you've done is prove yourself a liability and a target. I hope you are fakeclaiming, and that you're really a VT, so you can lure away a night kill.

Titus, why Flench and not Glass? Make your case.

Glass, I'm not sure if Glass is town or scum. He could be scum. I am more confident that Flench is scum for the reasons I previously posted in Post 230. He hasn't posted since that discussion I believe, at least not anything of significant value. I'll almost always vote for who I suspect the heaviest of being scum. Glass I could go either way on at this point. French, I'm much more confident in my scum read.

[Varsoon]

Well, I wanted to Vote:Saki and make him flinch, but all this happened while I was out bowling.


So, would this be a poor time to counter-claim Roleblocker?

[Saki]

Construction of Flench-scum case in progress

Bascially I think that I think Flench is scum because he did not move is vote at all and still doesn't post after this whole claim business.

P-Edit :: Dunno why you'd do that. There could be more than one RB, could be less. And no I wouldn't flinch at fakehammers, especially one that comes from you Varsoon.

[Varsoon]

Well, because I am Roleblocker.

Flench could just be, you know, not home and on the site, Saki. See if he's been posting elsewhere?

[Saki]

Following up from the P-Edit, you would be better off claiming that there was no RB instead of CCing RB. Or if you just want to screw with people yeah then go ahead.

P-Edit :: Dunno, I'll check. Pretty sure I'm the roleblocker, though.

[Saki]

Nope my apologies he has not been posting elsewhere.

[Varsoon]

Well, it's not a matter of lying to town. My Role PM says that I am a roleblocker.
Is it possible we're both Roleblockers?

P:EDIT: Then it's safer to assume, given how conversational he's been, that he's AFK. No need to fan the fire on someone who's literally done nothing.

[Titus]

VOTE: Saki

I highly doubt we have two roleblockers. It's theoretically possible we have two roleblockers.

[Saki]

It is possible that we both are roleblockers.

Given the information that you're a roleblocker the setup would be as follows:
MBBBXXX

Which is possible.

I still don't like how he never moved the vote although he could have, multiple times.

P-Edit :: You trust Varsoon right off the bat, Titus?

[oriole]

I don't suppose either of you is one-shot?

[Saki]

Reevaluating scumreads.

Titus, Varsoon, JMO (yes he's not afk)

VOTE: Titus

P-Edit, Oriole I doubt Varsoon would do that as that would confirm me as town.

[Titus]

Wow. OMGUS. You're not voting the guy who makes your claim improbable, instead you vote me.

[Saki]

Extra scumpoints for trying to dismiss my case before I even make it with OMGUS.

[Saki]

Titus, you've never actually read Varsoon as town or scum yet you trust his claim right off the bat while doubting mine at L-1 for half a page?

[Titus]

I've been pretty clear that I've always thought Varsoon as town. So yeah, I trust my town read over my scum read.

[Saki]

I've been pretty clear that I've always thought Varsoon as town. So yeah, I trust my town read over my scum read.

Point out the most recent post in which you've townread Varsoon.

[Saki]

Going to bed, don't expect posts from me for about 8-10 hours.

@Titus think of how you're going to get out of this one.