Mafia 60: Face-to-Face - Game over!

[spectrumvoid]

On second thought: I should make it clear that my andrews paraphrase was half a joke. Because a: there's no evidence of scum buddies as of now (joke) b: I think AS could be scummy (not a joke.)

[Mr Stoofer]

Vote Count

spectrumvoid: 5 (Fritzler, Glork, Adele, Zindaras, CES)
AndrewS: 3 (Thesp, ChannelDelibird, spectrumvoid)
IH: 2 (Ether, Patrick)
Mgm: 2 (AndrewS, IH)
Ether: 1 (Nightfall)
Patrick: 1 (MrBuddyLee)

Not voting: Mgm

8 to lynch!

148 hours and 39 minutes until deadline!

[AndrewS]

SV: Placing the last vote would be bad for me regardless: If the lynched was scum, it would look like bussing. If the lynched was town, it would be me trying to get rid of townies. I just want to make sure that we do lynch someone before the deadline.

[Thesp]

Thesp: As I explained when I made it, it was a prod to start reading the game. Since then, I've been holding my vote in case I needed to hammer in order to beat a deadline.

Which is awesome when several people do that. In fact, it makes it hard for someone to get to the point of hammertization when people hold back their votes. I'm adding this to the "list of crap spewed forth from the mouth of AndrewS this game" tally.

[Thesp]

Thesp: As I explained when I made it, it was a prod to start reading the game. Since then, I've been holding my vote in case I needed to hammer in order to beat a deadline.

Which is awesome when several people do that. In fact, it makes it hard for someone to get to the point of hammertization when people hold back their votes. I'm adding this to the "list of crap spewed forth from the mouth of AndrewS this game" tally.

Looking back, I think this post is unnecessarily harsh. I do not mean for this to be personal. I just don't think its a good idea at all.

[Glork]

Thesp, what do you think of SV's paraphrases of some of Andrew's posts?

[Mgm]

SV, with a deadline coming, claiming is perhaps a good thing. If you wait too long to claim you're probably going to get lynched, unless people start switching.

[IH]

....

unvote, vote:SV

= | I'd rather lynch Mgm by the way.

-2. Claim.

[Mgm]

Vote: AndrewS

.
Just fuelling the wagon I like best.

[Patrick]

....unvote, vote:SV

= | I'd rather lynch Mgm by the way.

-2. Claim.

IH, please explain to me what you think the case against spectrumvoid is.

[Nightfall]

I feel highly dissatisfied with Nightfall this game. I feel him

lurklurklurk

ing

nightfall, why are you voting Ether? Who do you think is scum? Can we have some input from you before the deadline, other than some minor humor about the dice?

I've explained my Ether vote, but if you want more I'll do my best to put together a more in depth post on what I think about the game tommorrow.

[AndrewS]

You say that too much. Most of your posts have been saying that you'll post something significant tomorrow. It's getting annoying.

[Nightfall]

Since you keep telling MGM to read the thread, maybe you should do the same. That is the first time all game that I have said that I would post something significant tommorrow. Also your repeated poor excuses you use when argueing with Thesp as to why you voted no lynch are also getting annoying.

[Thesp]

Thesp, what do you think of SV's paraphrases of some of Andrew's posts?

I find them very funny.

[Mgm]

Since you keep telling MGM to read the thread, maybe you should do the same. That is the first time all game that I have said that I would post something significant tommorrow. Also your repeated poor excuses you use when argueing with Thesp as to why you voted no lynch are also getting annoying.

MGM, nobody thought that Glork was serious. Nobody other than you. This shows that you weren't reading the game. That is why I

was

voting for you. There is no rationalization for lynching a player over a joke. I don't believe that you're being stupid per se, rather that you're not paying as much attention as you could be. That is the real problem.

After checking my own posts, it appears I haven't explained my reasoning for unvoting Glork. The intervening posts made me doubt my decision of voting him. It doesn't appear you paid much attention yourself. You

are

voting me, rather than "was". Also, in this post you clearly ignore the fact that I actually unvoted him and you didn't change your vote after Adele mentioned it wasn't all that clearly a joke either.

[Mr Stoofer]

Vote Count

spectrumvoid: 6 (Fritzler, Glork, Adele, Zindaras, CES, IH)
AndrewS: 4 (Thesp, ChannelDelibird, spectrumvoid, Mgm)
IH: 2 (Ether, Patrick)
Mgm: 2 (AndrewS)
Ether: 1 (Nightfall)
Patrick: 1 (MrBuddyLee)

8 to lynch!

127 hours and 13 mintues until deadline!

[Glork]

Thesp, what do you think of SV's paraphrases of some of Andrew's posts?

I find them very funny.

Do you find them scummy?

[Thesp]

Thesp, what do you think of SV's paraphrases of some of Andrew's posts?

I find them very funny.

Do you find them scummy?

In and of themselves, not particularly.

[MrBuddyLee]

After checking my own posts, it appears I haven't explained my reasoning for unvoting Glork.

I checked back and didn't see where anyone asked you why you unvoted Glork. In my experience, scum's more likely to do things like reread to pre-emptively defend against possible attacks.

Andrew, what's your take on spectrumvoid?

[Glork]

In and of themselves, not particularly.

So you don't think that this:

Another Andrew paraphrase: I've been holding my vote because I want a chance to bus my scumbuddy and look innocent tomorrow.

looks the least bit propagandic or falsely incriminating?

[spectrumvoid]

I'm a vig. I'm claiming due to the deadline, nothing else.

[Patrick]

Deadline's not until the 13th. Now still, I'm asking IH to tell me what he though the case against spectrumvoid was, given that he put her at -2 and told her to claim. If we're talking non contribution, there's a bunch of other ppl who also fall under that category.

[Mgm]

After checking my own posts, it appears I haven't explained my reasoning for unvoting Glork.

I checked back and didn't see where anyone asked you why you unvoted Glork. In my experience, scum's more likely to do things like reread to pre-emptively defend against possible attacks.

Andrew, what's your take on spectrumvoid?

Andrew said he voted me because of my vote on Glork, so that post was to show how his vote no longer makes sense.

[Mgm]

Deadline's not until the 13th. Now still, I'm asking IH to tell me what he though the case against spectrumvoid was, given that he put her at -2 and told her to claim. If we're talking non contribution, there's a bunch of other ppl who also fall under that category.

Some people tend to post less in the weekend. If he wants to have a good chance of survival, not waiting with his claim until the very last moment is a good thing.
I don't think SV should be lynched right now.

[Glork]

Hm. Fairly provable, I suppose.

Unvote, Vote: AndrewS

You should vig IH.