hey cabd can I have your undivided attention plz!!!
do I have your attention now? do I? I hope so.
let's have a talk.
I will let you in on a little seekrit. it is a joke amongst some people who knows us that majiffy is not the real beast in this duo that it is actually me. I am the beast. you know why? cos as mean and abrasive as majiffy gets he is nothing like me when I actually lose my temper. I get downright mean and nasty. I mean
mean
. but I had a fairly recent event in march that guess what! I can't talk about cos it has to do with an ongoing game! that made me want to do better about controlling my temper. so I am trying. I am
but you are seriously pushing it. so let's have this convo just once and be done with it, sound good?
In post 2345, Cabd wrote:Let me be clear.
I'm not saying 2 is reading town in my book. It's still leaning scum because despite the answer I think the 4 thing was a slip.
However. I'll be damned if I lynch ANYONE on "evidence" that doesn't fucking exist.
let's stop here. not being shown and not existing are two very different things. do you understand this? <----- this is a question I want you to answer. I want to make sure you understand. it is a yes or no question I don't want to hear anything else but yes or no.
I figured out what I was feeling a few posts ago. The word I was searching for was "unethical"
It is unethical as fuck to push a lynch on "illegal" evidence that you can't even speak about.
As far as I'm concerned, until you (BB) and nacho present the other parts of the case, you have no case.
here it is. here is that line. if you are accusing someone of being unethical you might as well accuse them of cheating cos it boils down to the same thing when you remove the grey areas. cheating, is against site rules and is a bannable offence. so let's not go there okay? cos that will just cause a lot of really unnecessary bad feelings all the way around.
so let's address the misrep you are trying to push. okay? are you with me? okay.
you are saying that nacho and I are pushing cases based on "evidence" that we cannot reveal.
you are wrong.
my case on the fery half of 2 is meta that has been gleaned from over 50 games. that's right. you heard me. mindboggling isn't it. we have played
that
much together. when you have that played many times together you develope a history together and more importantly learn to read each other. where we are at now is that the history is getting in the way of the reads. we probably won't be playing any more games together.
fery is doing her scummy fery thing. from her exchanges with sven, to her hedging her read on sven, to her lack of scumhunting. she is providing content and reads but as mac pointed out there is a cautiousness to them that is completely out of character for her. when fery scumhunts she pursues her suspects and runs them down and pins them and she is not doing that at all in this game. her scum list consists of easy to lynch players i.e. low hanging fruit. nacho has a scum read on buldey and I am trusting him on it. add them both together and you get 2. hehe, get it? I am trying to be funny here. I also have a light scum read on buldey just based off his play. the only thing that remotely looks genuine was his outrage that I would think that he would spam the thread intentionally as a scum tactic. his outrage looked genuine and it probably is cos all that he is saying here is that he spams the thread regardless of alignment. <----- alignment neutral so he gets no points for genuine outrage. everything else looks vaguely scummy and his epic flail earlier looks like scum who has been caught not frustrated town. nacho and I will talk and we will go from there.
^^^that is my case on fery. so don't you dare misrep me about it again. okay?
now let's address that you have your own scum read on 2. okay, good! so you will not be voting 2 because we are asking you to you will be voting 2 because of your own scum read. okay? that settles everything. I was talking to mac, nacho and orc. not you. don't take it personally but I was not addressing you when I made that comment. at all. period. end of story. I have played with mac and orc before, I am reading them as very town and so that is who I am directly working with. I am also wanting to work with rev too. right now I am trying to get a read off of andy but it is trickier cos I do not know him and will probably need nacho's help to sort it. I like my exchanges with andy. he is fun. unfortunately fun is not alignment indicative.
so anyways I hope we understand each other now and maybe we can find some way to work together.
