The Fortnight (Game Over)

greygnarl · Post Post #850 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 2:52 pm

In post 836, Benmage wrote:
In post 809, MattP wrote:You SERIOUSLY don't think scum would try to pull that off nonchalantly because it looks SO brazen it HAS to be town, benmage
Like seriously
I'm not saying scum couldnt... I'm saying greygnarl couldn't.

p sure I did this as scum before, though it might have been as town.

Also Matt for your scenario to be true I have to be really good scum, or Ghostlin has to be coaching me.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #851 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 2:54 pm

Oversoul, that wall is total BS.

If Benmage was so scummy, why didn't you vote him? Why didn't you ask him questions about all the other stupid things he posted (his iso is a goldmine), and ask that we lynch him?

The Regfan/Kid A excuses are a whole lot of nothing that we knew already.

Why aren't YOU voting CES, you colossally inflated scumbag?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #852 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 2:55 pm

Oversoul you also ignored 60% of the player list, including your buddy.

Oversoul · Post Post #853 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 3:39 pm

I realize that DGB.

I addressed the issues that people have with me. That was the entire point. I never said I was goin to do a whole comprehensive reread.

And I am voting CES you jack wagon.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #854 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 3:43 pm

Your CES case is based on meta voodoo.

Don't worry. My vote is parked on you until the game ends. You will lose.

BBmolla · Post Post #855 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 3:44 pm

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Oversoul

Oversoul · Post Post #856 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 4:18 pm

I lose if I'm lynched regardless.

Why are you town reading CES?
Is it Meta?

ISO · Post Post #857 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 4:23 pm

First, I think I have a man-crush on Kuribo now.

In post 834, JacobSavage wrote:Literally nothing changed.

2nd, this needs to die as well. If only we had more than one lynch. Jacob is quickly climbing the scum ladder. While OS is vehemently unable to do anything but troll, somehow in 35 pages this player (who has less posts than GiF by the way) has absolutely nothing to say. BULLSHIT

MOAR JACOB VOTES

ISO · Post Post #858 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 4:26 pm

OS while I appricate #847 (I really do) it's about 20 pages too late.

greygnarl · Post Post #859 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 4:31 pm

Either TBone hasn't realized the setup yet or he is scum.

ISO · Post Post #860 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 4:35 pm

Either Greygnarl can't comprehend this language or he's scum.

What are you so confused by? I understand this set-up perfectly. I can help you.

greygnarl · Post Post #861 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 4:39 pm

Why are you pushing a lynch on people for sucking when we only have one lynch?

ISO · Post Post #862 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 4:45 pm

I'm hedging my options.

Ghostlin · Post Post #863 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 6:19 pm

In post 837, Benmage wrote:So we can't grow a pair maybe and take down a player *gasp DGB* you wouldn't normally see hang D1.

I tend not to vote for people I think are town, but this is a unique spin on scum hunting.

Quilford · Post Post #864 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:04 pm

In post 748, Benmage wrote:
In post 630, GuyInFreezer wrote:Oh. Btw just gonna throw this here.
Quilford's RQS is terrible and I see no purpose behind it.
Yeah I don't remember anything of remembering from quilford... Possibly our off the beat scummer.. will look into it.. Would go with DGB "suspecting" her partner.

interesting

Are you guys dumb as fuck or what?

Do you know what the R in RQS stands for?

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #865 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:09 pm

fyi the problem with your rqs was that it wasnt needed.

Quilford · Post Post #866 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:10 pm

In post 755, MattP wrote:If people don't see that vote as histrionic, out-of-left-field, and opportunistic they're wrong and should feel bad.

I'm sorry, did you read kanye's GuyInFreezer vote??

He's also disappeared for the past 24 hours...
Pedit: oh there we go

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #867 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:10 pm

i reread page 1 again to confirm why i was mad @ ur rqs and im not sure how i missed how terrible that first post by jacobsavage is.

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #868 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:11 pm

hi quilford : ]

Quilford · Post Post #869 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:13 pm

In post 865, kanyeknowsbest wrote:fyi the problem with your rqs was that it wasnt needed.

Excellent contribution, thanks.

I guess you must be psychic considering you knew five posts in, four of which were Benmage derping, that my RQS wasn't going to be 'needed'.

Not that not being needed is a problem, anyway.

Quilford · Post Post #870 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:15 pm

WHY AM I SO ANGRY

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #871 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:16 pm

the problem with your rqs: ben's first 3 posts. your post comes in shortly after his, completely ignores what he has done, and distracts from a very controversial point to talk on.

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #872 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:17 pm

im really not sure what about that is so infuriating for you. it was a strong point i felt was worth mentioning at that point in time and its something that im mulling over in the back of my mind, but its not that big a deal at this point so i dont really get it.

Quilford · Post Post #873 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:18 pm

Name that 'controversial point'.

I see you have moved the goalposts from 'not needed' though.

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #874 (ISO) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:19 pm