Mini 1439 -- Game Over

Om of the Nom · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:17 am

I respond with this: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p4848142

Red Dragon · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:20 am

In post 323, Om of the Nom wrote:
Did you ever think to get a read on them instead of just keeping them as null? Are you just not getting any feelings either way or are they conflicting feelings?

YES BECAUSE BAD READS WILL MOST CERTAINLY WIN US THE GAME. I would rather have solid reads than a bunch of shit. Wouldn't you?

In post 326, qwints wrote:
In post 319, Fegelein wrote:UNVOTE: Bacde
VOTE: qwints

I want you guys to ISO him, and you will see how keen he is to jump onto vote bandwagons, and with little detail as to why. He's dramatically slipping under the radar here.

Can I just say that I find the idea of "dramatically slipping under the radar" amusing? I'm picturing Catherine Zeta-Jones in Entrapment.

Where are the YOLO votes?

Right here. Yolo is still one of my top suspects. The wagon fell apart for no reason at all. Someone who just wants to see someone else get to l-1 should get to l-1 themselves.

BUMP v Nom is just a bunch of noise. Don't really buy the bump case atm.

In post 355, Cheery Dog wrote:Why's YOLO on L-3 now?

Because he is really really scummy.

In post 359, MrBump wrote:TIL Om can't be scum because he is active, but that logic does not apply to me.

Activity is meaningless. I have seen scum lurk. I have seen town lurk. I have seen active town. I have seen active scum. Content is what matters.

In post 369, Om of the Nom wrote:
In post 368, MrBump wrote:
In post 361, Cheery Dog wrote:
In post 359, MrBump wrote:TIL Om can't be scum because he is active, but that logic does not apply to me.

Who is calling Om not scum because he is active?

Himself.

Its called self-meta.

HERE WE GO WITH THE SELF META DEFENSE. Anyone who self metas is dumb. Meta as a defense is bullshit. I could go for an om wagon on this actually. I really could. Self meta is so scummy. Because it basically says "hay guys... I'm manipulating things to look townie. PLZ BELIVE ME I'M TOWN fo Sures." Yeah, om is scummy and deserves a wagon.

Ohh cool qwints agrees with me.

vote: om the nom

Don johnsn is a buddy that will have to be investigated further.

Cheery Dog · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:20 am

In post 372, qwints wrote:
In post 369, Om of the Nom wrote:Its called self-meta.

OM is 100% guaranteed scum.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Om of the Nom

I take it you haven't seen Om in action before if you're that confident.

don_johnson · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:21 am

In post 374, Fegelein wrote:Why am I the only one voting qwints atm?

well, i have already pledged my allegiance to nom. help us lynch our guy, then we can help you lynch yours? Hey om, can we bring fegel into our club?

Red Dragon · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:21 am

In post 375, Om of the Nom wrote:I respond with this: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p4848142

irrelevant example because in this case someone asked you for it. Here you were basically... "yeah I'm town guys because here is my meta". There are serious problems with that line of reasoning.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:22 am

In post 374, Fegelein wrote:Why am I the only one voting qwints atm?

Tbh, if Bump is scum then qwints being the buddy isn't unlikely. qwints began the game making jabs at Bump but there was no conviction in them because they stopped very early for no apparent reason.

PEDIT: Fegel can join for now but if Bump's scum like I say then he won't be there for long.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:22 am

In post 379, Red Dragon wrote:
In post 375, Om of the Nom wrote:I respond with this: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p4848142

irrelevant example because in this case someone asked you for it. Here you were basically... "yeah I'm town guys because here is my meta". There are serious problems with that line of reasoning.

Because I can't have been asked for it if I hadn't used self-meta at all in the game before.

don_johnson · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:22 am

In post 376, Red Dragon wrote:

Don johnsn is a buddy that will have to be investigated further.

i prefer the term "sidekick".

p-edit: fegel, join us...

Red Dragon · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:23 am

In post 377, Cheery Dog wrote:
In post 372, qwints wrote:
In post 369, Om of the Nom wrote:Its called self-meta.

OM is 100% guaranteed scum.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Om of the Nom

I take it you haven't seen Om in action before if you're that confident.

and we have another purely meta defense.

Om of the Nom wrote:
In post 379, Red Dragon wrote:
In post 375, Om of the Nom wrote:I respond with this: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p4848142

irrelevant example because in this case someone asked you for it. Here you were basically... "yeah I'm town guys because here is my meta". There are serious problems with that line of reasoning.

Because I can't have been asked for it if I hadn't used self-meta at all in the game before.

Except that you are sort of hiding behind self meta right now.

Yeah, I'm really cool with an om lynch. After he flips we go for don or cheery in case of scum flip.

Red Dragon · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:24 am

In post 382, don_johnson wrote:
In post 376, Red Dragon wrote:

Don johnsn is a buddy that will have to be investigated further.

i prefer the term "sidekick".

p-edit: fegel, join us...

note this is a buddy claim.

don_johnson · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:25 am

"sidekick".

you are not a very good listener. i'll bet your girlfriend says that to all her girlfriends...

Om of the Nom · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:25 am

But seriously wow that is a fucking terrible vote from both of you. Get your shit together or just stop trying because it's really hurting my eyes.

PEDIT: How am I hiding behind self-meta? If you've been paying any attention to anything that's happening you would realise that I'm in no danger of being lynched right now because basically half the game is sheeping me, and anyone with a brain is reading me as town.

don_johnson · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:26 am

^^trudat.

Cheery Dog · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:26 am

In post 370, don_johnson wrote:
In post 357, Cheery Dog wrote:
In post 356, Om of the Nom wrote:At least get off the d_j/chillkid wagon for now

I don't have faith that's he is town, so no. Much more likely scum than town currently in my opinion.

whatchu need, bra?

Better content than chillkid had given.

)
P-edit;, there's nothing wrong with him reading scum there, but that level of diffidence is just out of place.

don_johnson · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:31 am

just iso'd chillkid. looks fine to me. voted, gave reads. moved the game forward. you seem to be taking advantage of an empty slot.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:31 am

In post 383, Red Dragon wrote:After he flips we go for don or cheery in case of scum flip.

Firstly, who would you go for if I get lynched now (as unlikely as that is) and flip town (because it's going to happen, much to your dismay)?
Secondly, you better put SAS on that list because I know he'll have my back on the self-meta fiasco. Don's a massive sheep to me this game, so i don't mind you reading him as scum, but both Cheery and SAS have played with me before, so they know how I play. Even if I actually was scum anyway I wouldn't even need buddy protection because I'm in a really good position.

Bacde · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:32 am

D_j is town

that much is clear

D_J when are you gonna start doing something though

don_johnson · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:33 am

when i get the time. just having fun for now. maybe sunday or monday. thanks for noticing.

Fegelein · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:45 am

Ehh, even though I don't find DJ that scummy, there's a possibility that he is scum, but that only applies if Om is Town.

Unsure where I stand on this Om wagon. Will think about it.

Red Dragon · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:48 am

yeah, I'm really happy with my om vote. Flailing scum is flailing scum. Anyway, time to do real work.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:52 am

Self-meta never has and never will be a scum tell regardless of the person comitting it. I've almost never seen it come from scum.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:53 am

Also answer my fucking question and don't just sit on the fucking invisible high horse you have there.

Bacde · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:23 am

In post 393, Fegelein wrote:Ehh, even though I don't find DJ that scummy, there's a possibility that he is scum, but that only applies if Om is Town.

Unsure where I stand on this Om wagon. Will think about it.

this doesn't make any sense

fegel are you scum?

Bacde · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:29 am

In post 394, Red Dragon wrote:yeah, I'm really happy with my om vote. Flailing scum is flailing scum. Anyway, time to do real work.

Please point out the flail to me

as one townie to another

since I don't see it but would love to be convinced :3

MrBump · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2013 6:11 am

In post 386, Om of the Nom wrote:But seriously wow that is a fucking terrible vote from both of you. Get your shit together or just stop trying because it's really hurting my eyes.

I come across as overly defensive and two votes get this? Oh my, my town read on you just vanished!

In post 389, don_johnson wrote:just iso'd chillkid. looks fine to me. voted, gave reads. moved the game forward. you seem to be taking advantage of an empty slot.

He voted on bad wagons, his entire ISO reads poor though ;/

Om's reaction in general was atrocious. It's like "I AM TOWN LEADER. IF YOU DO NOT SHEEP ME, YOU ARE RETARDED."