Royal Family Mafia - Game Over!

[HackerHuck]

I'm still not getting the wagon on Bogre, he just hasn't made any posts for us to tell. He should be on the neutral list according to LL, as he hasn't gotten a read, but he's siding with him being scum.

Why not Jack, if he's the other person on your suspicions LL? You don't feel like voting for him? You should be able to get a better read on him since he's posted. I find it curious that you are focusing on Bogre instead of Jack...

There is a "theorum" that explains why Bogre is scum...

Silent Speaker,

So... not random, then. Unvote: Ether, vote: Canucklehead.

This looks mafia-ish.


Also, you were the first vote on Ether, who at the time of my suspicion, had the highest bandwagon. The "first day first wave mafia bandwagon" theorem dictates that there is usually exactly one mafia on the first 4-vote wagon on day1, and the 4th vote is not a mafia. IH is townie, and Ether is townie, thus: it's either you or Bogre.

FOS: Bogre

P.S. I'm a nut, but not crazy

I asked LL for clarification on this theorum since it seems to draw more than a few conclusions, but I got no response.

Luckay, please confirm my understanding of your logic behind Bogre being scum.

1. Ether is town
2. The Ether bandwagon is the "first day first wave mafia bandwagon" and it consisted of these votes (in order of placement): SilentSpeaker, IH, Bogre, Fritzler, CES, Canucklehead
3. One (and only one) voter on the "first day first wave mafia bandwagon" is scum.
4. Fourth vote is not scum (Clears Fritzler)
5. IH is not scum
6. Between SilentSpeaker and Bogre, you fancy Bogre as scum.

Assuming the above is correct, I have a few questions.
Do your numbers apply to games of all sizes or do you scale it accordingly?
Why are you so certain of Ether's innocence? Is it her singing or your spreadsheet?
Same question about IH, except for the singing.
Why no mention of CES? He should be one of your options unless he's considered town.
"Can we vote for the silent speaker now?" was posted twice in closing your posts and now you've flipped over to Bogre. That's the explanation I'm most curious about now. Why is Bogre suddenly more suspicious than SilentSpeaker?

[Save The Dragons]

holy shit I've fallen behind.

I dunno if I'm going to be able to catch up before deadline, but I'll try.

[Ether]

unvote; vote: Twito

I believe that makes six votes on Twito. Seven to lynch at deadline.

[Twito]

I'm not going to be able to catch up before deadline sorry guys.

One guestion I saw when trying to atleast eye through new posts was what happened with me and LL.
I already explained it.
He gave me a headache after rereading many pages of his mindless posts. So I decided to vote him since I don't see him making any sence.
But how can I reason my vote on him without being able to understand his defence or whatever he has said.
So I though of next best solution and that was to take what he says as truth and not guestionize it. I did this by voting the same as he did. Though still giving my opinion about what I think of each situation.
If you lynch me for this too bad if there are other reasons to vote me I'm not gonna be able to find them since I will not be able to read the new posts before deadline. If deadline shall be moved I'll be around at 10th at the latest to read the new posts.

[IH]

pheh, I'm not willing to let a no lynch go down on the first day, and Twito is a wagon with something substantial behind it....

In light of the dead line I'm going to

unvote, vote:Twito

I encourage Twito to claim ASAP, as we have a deadline in two days, less than 48 hours I believe.

= ( Everyone, please post something with CONTENT, besides "mm, here" before the deadline. THIS MEANS YOU BOGRE AND LUCKAY.
(and everyone else)

(Though I suspect Luckay can't get online, especially if he lives in the midwest. I saw on the news about a giant blizzard that had knocked power out of around 4 whole states.)

[Nightson]

Back, I will reread and post.

[Jack]

In light of the dead line I'm going to

unvote, vote:Twito

I thought you confirm voted me

[Canucklehead17]

Buddy, you're public enemy Number 1 in Day 2.

Especially if Twito is scum. I've noticed you keep harping on how you just don't get the Twito wagon.

[Jack]

Buddy, you're public enemy Number 1 in Day 2.

Especially if Twito is scum. I've noticed you keep harping on how you just don't get the Twito wagon.

If your detective how am I public enemy #1 tomorrow?

[LuckayLuck]

Twito is not scum. Scum strategy is not to blindly follow a person most deem insane, then later, completely 180 degree and not follow that person.

Once again, I advise a Bogre wagon, and I greatly dislike the Twito wagon. The bogre wagon has gotten some seort of eerily complete avoidance, which (usually) further indicates scum...

also:

Do your numbers apply to games of all sizes or do you scale it accordingly?
Why are you so certain of Ether's innocence? Is it her singing or your spreadsheet?
Same question about IH, except for the singing.
Why no mention of CES? He should be one of your options unless he's considered town.
"Can we vote for the silent speaker now?" was posted twice in closing your posts and now you've flipped over to Bogre. That's the explanation I'm most curious about now. Why is Bogre suddenly more suspicious than SilentSpeaker?

• Numbers scale accordingly.
  
• I'm convinced of Ether's innocence because of her innocent townie style of writing.
  
• I'm convinced of IH's innocence because of his inquisitive & understanding townie style of writing.
  
• CES is one of my suspects by prcoess of elimination.
  
• I have been temporarily diverted from the SilentSpeaker lynch because I find this post somewhat townie-ish: Post 139

[LuckayLuck]

I'm still not getting the wagon on Bogre, he just hasn't made any posts for us to tell. He should be on the neutral list according to LL, as he hasn't gotten a read, but he's siding with him being scum.

Why not Jack, if he's the other person on your suspicions LL? You don't feel like voting for him? You should be able to get a better read on him since he's posted. I find it curious that you are focusing on Bogre instead of Jack...

Jack is not scum. Why is he not scum?

Bogus, I don't find your claim genuine at all.

Unvote, Vote:Canucklehead17

Scum does not make this post.
By process of elimination, Bogre must be scum...(or at least has a good chance of being scum)

[IH]

Twito is not scum. Scum strategy is not to blindly follow a person most deem insane, then later, completely 180 degree and not follow that person.

I would like to cite the Orient Express from GreyLabrynth, one Mnowax, who does that all the time. Ether knows what I'm talking about.

Scum does not make this post.

Why don't scum make this post? He's trying to get a claimed cop with a decent cop lynched. = / He didn't jump on the wagon until Canuckle claimed.

[Jack]

Why don't scum make this post? He's trying to get a claimed cop with a decent cop lynched. = / He didn't jump on the wagon until Canuckle claimed.

Look IH. Imagine if someone you found somewhat suspicious made, under pressure, a cop claim that you found really scummy sounding and probably fake. Wouldn't you vote for them? Surely you must realize that not everyone who votes for someone you think is innocent is scum.

[TheEyeOfMordor]

LL, I do not agree with your town vibes system which is why I am still voting you. Saying somebody is town based on one thing is wrong. I might believe that the person is town but one can never be certain.

[the silent speaker]

I'd give more reasoning of exactly

why

I thought the claim was fake than a bald "I don't believe you," I'll tell you that right now, Jack.

TEOM, unless you think his "town vibes system" is designed to specifically mislead people into thinking the scum are town, LL's not scummy for following it, and it's no reason to vote for him. Townies aren't required to have bug-free scumdars.

[the silent speaker]

In fact,

Unvote: Twito, vote: TEOM.

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

FoS: the silent speaker

Unvote, vote: Twito

[Mariyta]

Deadline tomorrow. Just a reminder.

[Zindaras]

We need some amount of votes at deadline, right?

In that case,

Unvote, Vote: Twito, Heavy FoS: IH

.

[Maz Medias]

@LL: WIFOM. Meet your maker, bitch.

[HackerHuck]

Great googly moogly!
Deadline is tomorrow and I'm in dire need of a vote count!
Can the glorious chef

Cardinal Ibelly

tally and post the votes for us?
I would also like confirmation on how many votes are required to lynch at deadline. Someone said seven at one point.

[Cardinal Ibelly]

The Official “Silly Putty!” Vote Count!

Twito – 8 – Thok, Mariyta, Arafax, Canucklehead17, Ether, IH, Cogito Ergo Sum, Zindaras

Bogre – 3 – LuckayLuck, Twito, PookyTheMagicalBear

Canucklehead17 – 1 – Fritzler
Cogito Ergo Sum – 1 – HackerHuck
HackerHuck – 1 – Mastermind of Sin
IH – 1 – Jack
Jack – 1 – Maz Medias
LuckayLuck – 1 – TheEyeofMordor
TheEyeofMordor – 1 – the silent speaker
the silent speaker – 1 – VitaminR

With

22

alive, it takes

12

(or

7

at deadline) to lynch!

Preoccupied reversing newspaper headlines – 3 – Bogre, Nightson, Save the Dragons

[IH]

@LL: WIFOM. Meet your maker, bitch.

When the next day starts I may be asking about this.

[Twito]

I'm a pumpkin that shoots lazer beams of it's ass. If I hit someone with a lazerbeam and this someone is part of Royal Family he/she will turn into a frog. I can kill twise a day and once at night. It's pretty cool role.

[Twito]

My secret shooting code is Fresh prince.
Fresh prince LL shall find his way to the pond¨