Micro : The Cult 2 (Game Over)

Remembrance · Post Post #575 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:24 pm

1. But he did almost the exact same pattern of behavior.

In post 1048, Remembrance wrote:^Beetle juice tell.

Read it this time please.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #576 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:04 pm

That really doesn't convince me. First of all, using 1 game as meta is terrible. Second of all, I'm the one who don't believe in beetle juice tell, because I do that regardless of my alignment.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #577 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:05 pm

EDIT: I'm one of those people who doesn't believe in beetle juice tell

thenewearth · Post Post #578 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 6:14 pm

In post 573, AngryPidgeon wrote:TNE is just proposing a plan to break the game which is shaky anyhow:
1. How do you know that me/remem/gif are all town?
2. The game isn't 100% breakable like you are kind of implying; Zor isn't dumb. (also Im odd night, and Remem's Pr is kinda meh since if there are 2 scum right now then there is no need for scum to be recruiting which means his PR wont do much)

1) I'm not. It's just assuming that you're all telling the truth
2) I know. All games are not 100% breakable but still breakable. Like Diffusion of power or something.

Deltabacon · Post Post #579 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:29 pm

Wait, so telling the truth from my perspective is AtE? I may as well not bother.

Why haven't we lynched Remembrance yet?

thenewearth · Post Post #580 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:45 pm

No no.

AtE is appealing to "Emotion"

Something like... "Fuck you guys I'm town, why can't you see that? Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck"

Something like that... yeah

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #581 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:32 am

In post 564, Deltabacon wrote:That wasn't an AtE. AtE is if I pulled the confused or upset card. It was a legitimate question. I'm not accepting a lynch on me, given that it would put us in LYLO once the Apostle (Rem) had the chance to pick the best way to fuck your plan over. Hyperbole is a misnomer as well. At no point have I over-represented what's going on here.

Oh, and it's touching that Rem has tried to run a meta on me with one game as scum. That's cute.

Wrong. Rem is CL.

In post 554, thenewearth wrote:
In post 551, Deltabacon wrote:Your theory sucks fucking balls, just sayin.

Defending.

K he CL

Can't be more serious.

In post 558, Remembrance wrote:VOTE: Delta Some habits die hard I guess.

Explain.

In post 562, Remembrance wrote:I'm mostly responding to his immediate AtE and hyperbole. He does this as scum.

Rem, I want you to point out to me which sentences of DB was AtE. I really don't see it.

zoraster · Post Post #582 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:47 am

Day 2

AngryPidgeon ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 5 )

Remembrance ( 2 )

GuyINFreezer

Deltabacon

[/color]

(L - 3 )

ArcAngel9 ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 5 )

Deltabacon ( 2 )

Remembrance

thenewearth

[/color]

(L - 3 )

GuyInFreezer ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 5 )

Kid A ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 5 )

RandomYoshi ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 5 )

thenewearth ( 2 )

Kid A

RandomYoshi

[/color]

(L - 3 )

No Lynch ( 0 )

Not Voting ( 2 )

ArcAngel9 AngryPidgeon

Total Votes ( 8 )

Needed to Lynch [ 5 ]

Deadline: April 13th at 20:00 EDT

RandomYoshi was prodded yesterday. If he doesn't pick up his Prod in the next few hours, I will search for a replacement.

Kid A · Post Post #583 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:36 am

In post 555, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 544, AngryPidgeon wrote:This setup is pretty wacky if everyone is telling the truth. Odd JK / Odd Rec checker? Protector with a JK?

Yoshi needs to claim. But 2 (half) prs and a full one would be roughly par for the course I think.

Isn't it obvious that some of these claims are obvious fake.. especially VT claims.

I need fresh mind to think this over... BRB!!!

why do you keep pushing that scum must be VT when you have no reason to think this

are you the recruit?

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #584 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:43 am

@Mod:

Is it possible for there to be 3 cult alive if the CL is protected when the Recruit recruits?

If so (and we don't hit cult today), you might wanna protect AA9 tonight, GIF, since shes confirmed not cult leader.

Also can we get like 2 more days for the RY extension?

Kid A · Post Post #585 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:45 am

In post 561, Deltabacon wrote:Btw, your theory doesn't account for the fact that if you mislynch the first JK target, and they aren't a member of the cult, you end up with 6 players: 4 townies, 2 Cult. Effectively, you put yourself into LYLO.

no you don't

worst case scenario:

current 6t 2c

mislynch + successful recruit

4t 2c

mislynch

3t 2c

so if we fuck up in every possible way we still have 3 days including today

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #586 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:47 am

In post 584, AngryPidgeon wrote:
@Mod:
Is it possible for there to be 3 cult alive if the CL is protected when the Recruit recruits?

If so (and we don't hit cult today), you might wanna protect AA9 tonight, GIF, since shes confirmed not cult leader.

Also can we get like 2 more days for the RY extension?

IC can't be protected in any way

Should I random target?

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #587 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:53 am

Why cant the IC be protected? Oh I missed that on the opening.

Well, I dunno. Use your best judgment. If there are likely 2 cult going into N2, then they have to sacrifice the CL to recruit, so its not that worth it for them.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #588 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:54 am

Also the PRs make a bit more sense given that the IC is 'macho'.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #589 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:57 am

For a split second I thought this was UN cult thread O.o

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #590 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:57 am

Kid A · Post Post #591 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:59 am

and yeah as gif said remem is almost definitely not the apostle but CL seems likely

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #592 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:38 am

In post 583, Kid A wrote:
In post 555, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 544, AngryPidgeon wrote:This setup is pretty wacky if everyone is telling the truth. Odd JK / Odd Rec checker? Protector with a JK?

Yoshi needs to claim. But 2 (half) prs and a full one would be roughly par for the course I think.

Isn't it obvious that some of these claims are obvious fake.. especially VT claims.

I need fresh mind to think this over... BRB!!!

why do you keep pushing that scum must be VT when you have no reason to think this

are you the recruit?

Are you even reading the game? It is highly impossible for CL to recruit me, CL would be shit in pants to recruit me in the last night as there was high possibility that watcher can keep a check on me..

Your reason for suspecting me as recruit doesn't sound postive. the reason i am VT's has possible CL or Cult team becuase any other claims they make, there would be counter claim, it is evident that cult would rather claim as VT than a power role.

Kid A · Post Post #593 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:17 am

In post 592, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 583, Kid A wrote:
In post 555, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 544, AngryPidgeon wrote:This setup is pretty wacky if everyone is telling the truth. Odd JK / Odd Rec checker? Protector with a JK?

Yoshi needs to claim. But 2 (half) prs and a full one would be roughly par for the course I think.

Isn't it obvious that some of these claims are obvious fake.. especially VT claims.

I need fresh mind to think this over... BRB!!!

why do you keep pushing that scum must be VT when you have no reason to think this

are you the recruit?

Are you even reading the game? It is highly impossible for CL to recruit me, CL would be shit in pants to recruit me in the last night as there was high possibility that watcher can keep a check on me..

Your reason for suspecting me as recruit doesn't sound postive. the reason i am VT's has possible CL or Cult team becuase any other claims they make, there would be counter claim, it is evident that cult would rather claim as VT than a power role.

The Cult Leader may have a power role in addition to being the Cult Leader and may both recruit and use his action at night.

Deltabacon · Post Post #594 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:24 am

/inb4imwrongandAAistheApostle

Rem needs to rebutt GiF's #581 or at least fail trying.

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #595 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:44 am

Kid A - What is the point of your post anyways? can put them out in words?

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #596 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:46 am

He means that you're ignoring the fact that CL can get Power role by suggesting a lynch between VT claims.

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #597 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:08 am

In post 596, GuyInFreezer wrote:He means that you're ignoring the fact that CL can get Power role by suggesting a lynch between VT claims.

Here is an example:
This much we are sure that CL don't have faction kill.. so this is not cultafia.
And the only possible night killing ability that one of us may have is that "Vig" and nobody has claimed that they have VIG power.
so I am i am VIG, I would be probably claiming VT or if VIG recruited by CL, I will still claim VIG becuz if I claim VIG, I have to exaplain about my night action.

So, do you understand why the recruitment may not claim his/her previous power role.

Remembrance · Post Post #598 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:00 pm

I am neither the CL nor the apostate.

Remembrance · Post Post #599 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:24 pm

1. I already did. read the Link, it may be a fact that we will be in lylo, if we mislynch. But it is still an appeal to fear, which falls under emotion.
2. I have talked to the Mod, while it is possible AA was recruited, she was not the cult leader day 1. Ask the mod, he said he'd be glad to say it in thread.
3. #575 click the link to post 1048. Which leads to his game, where he reacted much the same way. He has mislynched PimHel and it is illogical to assume I am the recruit, because it makes no sense. If you want me to, I will walk you through the logic.
4. Kid A, why do you think I'm the CL? when you read me as town, yesterday? While, we are back to square one in regards to apostates. The actions of the previous day are not invalid for the CL. So, opportunistic play is noted.