Mini 1433 - State Farm Mafia - Game over

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:06 pm

Couple quick things:
@Safety:

I never ever said that I was making a meta case on you based on ongoing games

.

I'm not

. Its not even really a meta read; it is in the sense that my case on Revenus is.

I just happen to think I understand your personality/playstyle which is something I can pick up from not even knowing your alignment and reading a game of yours.

Now, that one sentence that is causing all this fuss was a really offhanded remark by me that was a large part a note to myself to look into that thought more when I had time. Your reaction is to pin my own logic on me which is

Zdenek · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:22 pm

In post 735, Bacde wrote:
In post 734, Zdenek wrote:

Were you just trolling about Rev being town?

i dunno why but this post feels like a cookies caught in the cookie jar type post

That is nonsense. Even if you replace cookies with hands.

In post 739, Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:
In post 734, Zdenek wrote:Were you just trolling about Rev being town?

Dead serious. Disappointed?

-DGB

Nope. Just didn't understand your read yesterday, and curious why it changed.

In post 740, Hiraki wrote:So, I'm scum because my initial reads might be wrong?

No, you're scum because flipping votes between Absta and I makes practically no sense.

In post 741, Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:
In post 724, Zdenek wrote:AP's defence of Lurker at the end of day 1 is suspect. Lurker was scum, in my opinion seemed scummy, and looked like he might have ended up being lynched, and AP went out of his way to defend him.

What are you suggesting, that AP purposely defended a Serial Killer, knowing he was 3rd party?

Of course not. I'm suggesting that AP may have been trying to get town points by defending someone who he thought was town, and likely to flip. I also think that Lurker was legimately scummy, and the fact that he flipped SK means that I don't think I was wrong about that.

In post 745, IFM wrote:I assume it was different enough from your town meta that he considered it your scum.

Don't answer questions for other people.

In post 756, SafetyDance wrote:I am asking you to be mod-killed based on site-rules about discussion of current games. Fuck your claim.

There is no town motivation for this.

In post 763, kashoodles wrote:Zde was null-ish for me yesterday but scummy today, especially his interaction with Hiraki and trying to shove something onto AP in #724

Why? because this looks like bullshit to me.

In post 763, kashoodles wrote:But Lurker was a third party anyway. AP would have to be scum - how would he know what Lurker was to defend him?

That was just gibberish.

Absta, I still want to know where you are getting the idea that I am pro at scum.

Bacde · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:30 pm

^^I meant hands lol

Why did you make a sad face? Why were you sad about thinking that Dr Z MD was trolling about thinking Rev was town?

Zdenek · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:32 pm

In post 777, Bacde wrote:^^I meant hands lol

Why did you make a sad face? Why were you sad about thinking that Dr Z MD was trolling about thinking Rev was town?

No, that was regarding their forecast.

absta101 · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:39 pm

You were quite convincing Day 1. Some good acting.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:07 pm

In post 755, absta101 wrote:Why claim...?

What if someone else got protected or someone JKd? What does your claim do for us?

Eh. I am feeling entitled because I have reason to believe that I was killed (which makes me think at least one of my reads was right-on). I've been soft claiming it and lightly trolling for reactions all Day so it wasn't like scum couldn't figure it out.

In post 767, Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:VOTE: SafetyDance

It's pretty obv.

-DGB

Dear Dr. Zoidberg. The rest of the town may be content to let you pretend to be too carefree to back your bullshit up, but Im pretty sure you are scum. You were a universal townread and came out of last night alive when I was most certain you would die. Also your reasons for flip-floppng on Revenus look like scum posts.

So, I want a good answer, why is SD scum? Why wasn't it apparent before?

Also, Zdenek is mafia. Lynch it lynch it lynch it.

Also also - RY is site-flaking atm.

Zdenek · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:25 pm

In post 779, absta101 wrote:You were quite convincing Day 1. Some good acting.

You're so full of shit.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:08 am

Spoiler: Bacde, you know you wanna help me with this one

Bacde · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:10 am

^^That's actually really convincing

the only thing thats holding me back right now is RY though, I was happy about the wagon on him yesterday and I feel like he's getting off the hook by site-flaking

we have a lot of time so I don't see a motivation to rush this

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:11 am

^ Errr, JUST TO BE CLEAR THAT QUOTE FROM THE MOD DID NOT HAPPEN; I AM MAKING A JOKE AND COMPARISON BETWEEN MY/ZD's SCUM PLAY.

Im not trying to impersonate the mod, just making a comparison/prediction.

Bacde · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:13 am

I feel like SD would actually try to get you modkilled for that

absta101 · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:14 am

I will remember this Bacde, we all will.

Zed is mod confirmed scum now.

Doctor Zoidberg MD · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:24 am

In post 780, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Dear Dr. Zoidberg. The rest of the town may be content to let you pretend to be too carefree to back your bullshit up, but Im pretty sure you are scum. You were a universal townread

So? Scum aren't obligated to kill people who are seen as very-towny. Maybe they tried to pick off a suspected PR. Maybe they no-killed on purpose. There are lots of equally plausible explanations and your reasoning is specious.

and came out of last night alive when I was most certain you would die.

Cool. I'm not sure why scum (or we, for that matter) should give a rat's ass about your expectations for the night phase.

Also your reasons for flip-floppng on Revenus look like scum posts.

In what specific ways do they look like scum posts?

Bacde · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:38 am

In post 787, Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:
In post 780, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Dear Dr. Zoidberg. The rest of the town may be content to let you pretend to be too carefree to back your bullshit up, but Im pretty sure you are scum. You were a universal townread
So? Scum aren't obligated to kill people who are seen as very-towny. Maybe they tried to pick off a suspected PR. Maybe they no-killed on purpose. There are lots of equally plausible explanations and your reasoning is specious.

and came out of last night alive when I was most certain you would die.
Cool. I'm not sure why scum
(or we, for that matter) should give a rat's ass about your expectations for the night phase.

Also your reasons for flip-floppng on Revenus look like scum posts.
In what specific ways do they look like scum posts?

this is a good post esp. for the bolded

I'm not seeing Dr Z scum

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:41 am

In post 787, Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:Maybe they no-killed on purpose. There are lots of equally plausible

Yes, scum no killed last night. Thats totally equally plausible. Wuuuuuuuuuuuut.

In post 742, Doctor Zoidberg MD wrote:I originally had a meta-based scumread on Revenus but his play has come more into line with what I would expect from town-revenus

So Revenus's VERY FEW posts today totally subverted your read on him from scumscumscum to towntowntown? Like all the stuff he posted yesterday doesnt matter anymore and the stuff he posted today has X-infinity more weight?

The bolded is not town looking really.

Bacde · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:54 am

Actually it is

its worded in an aggravating manner for one

But using your expectations of the NK as evidence is weak

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:02 am

DGB is very capable of being aggressive/caustic as scum.

She is justifying why she wasnt killed by suggesting a nokill and simultaneously saying im dumb.

They are scum.

absta101 · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:07 am

Bacde, did you guys no-kill?

SafetyDance · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:18 am

In post 775, AngryPidgeon wrote:Couple quick things:
@Safety:
I never ever said that I was making a meta case on you based on ongoing games
.
I'm not
. Its not even really a meta read; it is in the sense that my case on Revenus is.

In post 672, AngryPidgeon wrote:^ I'm not able to comment more on that.

So there's nothing stopping you then from explaining yourself.

In post 775, AngryPidgeon wrote:
I just happen to think I understand your personality/playstyle which is something I can pick up from not even knowing your alignment and reading a game of yours.

I don't think you do understand me and if you've read a game of mine, that's not ongoing, then you can link a game(s) as proof, like someone normally would and not say something like:

In post 672, AngryPidgeon wrote:^ I'm not able to comment more on that.

In post 775, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Now, that one sentence that is causing all this fuss was a really offhanded remark by me that was a large part a note to myself to look into that thought more when I had time. Your reaction is to pin my own logic on me which is

In post 672, AngryPidgeon wrote: But I definitely gut read players better who play similarly to me (Vifam in ny161).

You make your bed, you lie in it.

It's simple, if you're publicly reasoning that you're reading someone as scum, regardless of reason ("gut"), because of ongoing games, you are violating the rules of the site and not definitely not playing in the spirit of the game.

Ergo request to apologise and renege or be modkilled.

SafetyDance · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:22 am

In post 770, RachMarie wrote:ummm AP hammered because of the SK claim...

At least pretend you're reading this game, RM.

In post 769, SafetyDance wrote:Which actually makes sense
because AP wanted RY lynched
and then moved to hammer lurker and this day has moved away from his scum-RY read. Which was my point.

Spoiler: L-O-O-K

Spoiler: R-E-A-D

Spoiler: U-N-D-E-R-S-T-A-N-D

SafetyDance · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:26 am

In post 776, Zdenek wrote:
In post 756, SafetyDance wrote:I am asking you to be mod-killed based on site-rules about discussion of current games. Fuck your claim.

There is no town motivation for this.

There is no town motivation for wanting to play a game by the rules outlined and agreed upon by everyone playing this site?

There's no town motivation for you to be this dense.

Vote:Zdenek

In post 785, Bacde wrote:I feel like SD would actually try to get you modkilled for that

Obvious joke comparison is obvious.

In post 786, absta101 wrote:I will remember this Bacde, we all will.

Zed is mod confirmed scum now.

I love how you make such an emphatic statement and follow it up with just as emphatic reasoning.

You could totally make the Bible Belt vote Obama with such persuasiveness.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:42 am

Vote Count 2.02
RachMarie -
Revenus -
Hiraki - Zdenek (L-6)
RandomYoshi - IFM (L-6)
Doctor Zoidberg MD -
Bacde -
absta101 - revenus (L-6)
SafetyDance - Hiraki, Dr. Z (L-5)
Kashoodles -

Zdenek - Absta101, kashoodles, AngryPidgeon, SafetyDance (L-3)

AngryPidgeon -
IFM -

Not Voting: RachMarie, RandomYoshi, Bacde

RandomYoshi has been prodded

Deadline is in (expired on 2013-04-28 07:35:00)

I am human and can make mistakes, if you see an error with the vote count please let me know.

RachMarie · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:13 am

In post 640, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Lurker claimed 3rd party? Ok, I can get on board with that then.

VOTE: Lurker

You forgot to quote THIS one SD...

Ahem

SafetyDance · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:32 am

In post 797, RachMarie wrote:
In post 640, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Lurker claimed 3rd party? Ok, I can get on board with that then.

VOTE: Lurker

You forgot to quote THIS one SD...

Ahem

Attempting to understand reason that post has to do with RandomYoshi or AP's read on RY...
...
...
...
Attempt Failed.

Please, do enlighten.

RachMarie · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:35 am

Nothing to do with his read on RY, but explains why he jumped off of RY to hammer Lurker.

Not liking the way you are hinting on AP. If you really think he is scum for this you should come out and say so.