Alright, this is Jack's third post I believe, and the other two were in the random stage I believe.
Post 87, Jack is confused about LL and his mason offer to someone "So those guys are masons?" not a scummy point, but worth notice.
Post 103, notifies of rereading, makes a statement about LL's playstyle.
Post 198, Jack votes for LL saying "We might as well lynch someone that's posting alot, then we can know if they're lying or not." What a great way to join a wagon!
lawl. lawl indeed. -_-;
Post 201, TSS asks "wtf" Jack responds "What?"
Post 209, Jack responds to STD's "If I were vig, Jack wouldn't be alive tomorrow" with "What? If we have to lynch someone, lynch someone who we'd learn the most of there posts and status!"
Post 224, Response to C-heads "Lynch jack, if he turns up town we have a reason to lynch LL", and then continues to be confused by STD's desire to vig him if he was a vig, and complains that we've been in day one a month.
ooooooo a moooonnnnttthhh.
Post 237, he says "I should have read the posts more" clearly you should have. Not only that, his one excuse for wanting a lynch, the length of day one, was shot down by saying... well... we hadn't even reached a month, especially with crashes. He responds with "details Details"
ODD BREAK FROM THE JACK
In post 247 it looks like C-head is ready to claim. Another point in his favor of his claim imo. His claim would change something, and he knew it.
END ODD BREAK FROM THE JACK
Post 274, he says he's wary of being defensive as scum.
Post 297, a vote on Nightson for having finals and not being able to post I'd assume. = /
Post 339 was an unnecessary picture? <.< Curious as to why MoS agreed with LL that Jack or Bogre must be scum.
Post 355, clarifying our wonderful mods intentions
Post 377, Good reasoning. woo!
Same for 379
Nothin much in 389 IMO
Post 402 is an obvious statement.
Post 410, ehhh
Post 428 was either a very bad joke, or something more sinister.
Post 464, Jack would rather go ahead and vote people.
Post 468, I was either Misinterpreted or Misrepresented. Either was possible.
Post 483 is in fact correct. I thought you had agreed with HH. Forgive me. Another note, how are we to know that anyways?
Post 494, confusion from him.
Post 534, Trying to get the claimed cop lynched
Post 542.
1)He was at lynch -1 or 2. That was the time
2)He's carrying things back and forth. Why not? Besides, why are you trying to outguess the mod?
3) You really didn't give him much choice = /
4)The omgus has been explained
5)errr, it was true?
6)......Because I didn't need to be on it. If I wanted to get off, I would get off. I don't want to lynch our claimed cop.
Post 553, either misunderstanding or.... something
Post 558, clarity. Answered above from 542
Post 566, Counterclaim point is valid. Something going uncontested? That doesn't mean you have to keep pushing for his lynch.
Post 577, alright, why are you voting me. = D Should I feel the omgus?
Post 605, We're not positive he's scum! Thats the point! We'll know for sure if we wait! Stop being stupid!
confirm vote:jack
Ether is the only one to provide ample reasoning of the wagon on me. = P I'd like an explanation from Jack and Zindaras, OTHER than "I agree with Ether LAWL"
Something more sinister? Are you serious? What exactly could be sinister about that. Pray tell.
