Oh, do explain what my scum motive is behind my votes. Quote them all and explain so I can laugh at you thinking that you can understand my motives.
Nacho wrote:
Your votes have been opportunistic in that none of them go anywhere and you are setting up for the hop onto whatever wagon you like later. No vote you've made has had anything real behind it. You don't usually avoid me as town. The one time I've played with you as scum, you ignored the shit out of me even after I reached out to you. You aren't playing that game twice, but the lean towards playing that way was definitely noted. The "you are painting me as scum because people just don't understand me!!" is also a bullshit defense. I can't bring up something that doesn't exist since all it would take is a few links to diffuse my attack.
None of them need to go anywhere. They serve their purpose and I can retract them. Tell me this; do I need to have once voted someone if I want to vote him later? Won't it in fact make me more contradicting if I later vote someone who I unvoted earlier? Do I need to setup in order to hop on a wagon? Wouldn't it take the same amount of scuminess from someone to attract my vote, regardless of if I have voted him in the past or not?
Find something else to accuse me with, this won't work.
For the "ignorance game", you are blatantly lying. We've played two newbies together, in both I ignored you at some point. In one I was town, in the other I was scum. I can ignore anyone I want as either alignment and this is is no way a tell for me.
Links you want? Links you will have.
Town Wisdom ignoring Nacho,
Scum Wisdom ignoring Nacho
It's also funny that you want to call me scum based on meta; I assure you that I play differently each time, as either town or scum; accusing me on meta tells will be hard to do.
Mantis brought up that I didn't like being ignored, you are quick to point out that in your last scum game you decided to ignore me. Why?
Mantis brought up that you might be like that because
she
ignored you. I told her that this is not the case because there's something much more related,
me
ignoring you.
