Mini 1439 -- Game Over

[Fegelein]

You Only Live Once.

[Secret Agent Sloth]

Vote: Red Dragon

Larry Elmore or Hannibal Lector?

~P

[Secret Agent Sloth]

Hello everyone, I know nobody. I expect we shall have a splendid time playing and theorising together carefully over who the scum are before carelessly tossing down votes.

VOTE: Norfolk Enchance

This seems awfully optimistic.

Whose vote has been the most careless so far?

~P

[RadiantCowbells]

Someone is named Yolo?

FIRE AND BRIMSTONE!

Unvote

Vote: YOLO

[chillkid]

Vote:RadiantCowbells

Only scum would want to have no avatar so as to make themselves more forgettable.

[MrBump]

Or someone who joined quite recently, like yo-

OH HEY

Are you an alt?

[qwints]

VOTE: YOLO

Sheeping Fegelein

[chillkid]

Or someone who joined quite recently, like yo-

OH HEY

Are you an alt?

I find that join dates do not matter. Scum shouldn't be underestimated.

No, but I have played here under a different name a long time ago.

[qwints]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: chillkid

for the implied scum claim.

[MrBump]

I find that join dates do not matter.

Hey, I think the same on avatar issues!

[Bacde]

things seem to be going well in this thread

[Fegelein]

It seems as if our game has stagnated already, so let's change that.

RVS is getting us nowhere at this moment in time, so I'm going to provide a question for us all to answer.

What do you think of chillkid's #32?

Personally, I think it's a town tell, as he does raise a good point. Just look at some of the past newbie games, there has been amazing newbie scum, and we shouldn't avoid scrutinizing someone because they are new.

I'm not out of RVS at this stage, because as far as I can see, there are no scum tells in my eyes. qwints's RVS play is a little suspicious, but I'm probably looking too deep into it. I'd quite like it if people answer my question though.

Sorry if you think that I'm taking the start of the game so seriously, I'm just seeing that people aren't getting the ball rolling here, so I've decided to do it myself.

[qwints]

What do you think of chillkid's #32?

Personally, I think it's a town tell, as he does raise a good point. Just look at some of the past newbie games, there has been amazing newbie scum, and we shouldn't avoid scrutinizing someone because they are new.

Aww, I was all set to sheep you all game because of the awesome avatar, but you had to do something like that.

Let's review:

chillkid: RVS vote for no avatar
MrBump: calling chillkid out for being new
chillkid: "join dates do not matter.

Scum

shouldn't be underestimated."

Now, they're clearly talking about chillkid's join dates, and chillkids response is to talk about

scum

when the implication is that

he

shouldn't be underestimated. In other words, he is scum.

[MrBump]

Well, recent join date in a Normal says alt or they migrated from elsewhere, that's all. His #32 strikes me as overly defensive to an innocent question, tbh, but it's hardly anything. We've had around 20 posts, maybe, all game, which makes it hard to go into serious QUITE yet. Maybe in another 15 posts or something.

[MrBump]

ninja'd and I have to brb, will be an hour 'till I respond

[Bacde]

tbh I think #32 and #36 are scummy

[qwints]

Well, recent join date in a Normal says alt or they migrated from elsewhere, that's all. His #32 strikes me as overly defensive to an innocent question, tbh, but it's hardly anything. We've had around 20 posts, maybe, all game, which makes it hard to go into serious QUITE yet. Maybe in another 15 posts or something.

Sad you outed your buddy so early?

[Bacde]

What do you think of chillkid's #32?

Personally, I think it's a town tell, as he does raise a good point. Just look at some of the past newbie games, there has been amazing newbie scum, and we shouldn't avoid scrutinizing someone because they are new.

Aww, I was all set to sheep you all game because of the awesome avatar, but you had to do something like that.

random question, do you vote people for things you are about to do?

[Fegelein]

Aww, I was all set to sheep you all game because of the awesome avatar, but you had to do something like that.

Let's review:

chillkid: RVS vote for no avatar
MrBump: calling chillkid out for being new
chillkid: "join dates do not matter.

Scum

shouldn't be underestimated."

Now, they're clearly talking about chillkid's join dates, and chillkids response is to talk about

scum

when the implication is that

he

shouldn't be underestimated. In other words, he is scum.

First of all, thanks for the compliment on my avatar

But as for the rest of your post:
At best, that's trying to grasp at straws, which might be helpful in the long run, especially if chillkid begins to appear scummy.
At worst, that's scum trying to use it as an excuse to create a bandwagon. Kind of correlates since you're in the butter zone.

I've played a game on another forum with a player similar to you, who got someone lynched for referring to the Town in third person. Both players flipped Town, but it was nowhere near as early as it is here.

I was actually going to vote you, when I saw this.

tbh I think #32 and #36 are scummy

How is that helpful if you don't explain?
UNVOTE: YOLO
VOTE: Bacde

[Bacde]

well, for one it gets reactions

such as you being overly defensive to my barely typed out post

[YOLO]

things seem to be going well in this thread

What makes you think this?

What do you think of chillkid's #32?

Personally, I think it's a town tell, as he does raise a good point. Just look at some of the past newbie games, there has been amazing newbie scum, and we shouldn't avoid scrutinizing someone because they are new.

Nulltell. The argument is sound, certainly, but that doesn't tell me anything about his alignment. Scum can use logic just as well as town.

Now, they're clearly talking about chillkid's join dates, and chillkids response is to talk about

scum

when the implication is that

he

shouldn't be underestimated. In other words, he is scum.

Is this really what you think or is this an attempt to get out of RVS?

We've had around 20 posts, maybe, all game, which makes it hard to go into serious QUITE yet. Maybe in another 15 posts or something.

Do you think the degree of 'seriousness' is determined by the number of posts?

[Fegelein]

It was more for the point on #32, didn't realise #36 was my post.

It might well get reactions, but it gives you negative coverage in the long run.

[Bacde]

It was more for the point on #32, didn't realise #36 was my post.

It might well get reactions, but it gives you negative coverage in the long run.

how much do you edit your posts when you write?

[Fegelein]

It was more for the point on #32, didn't realise #36 was my post.

It might well get reactions, but it gives you negative coverage in the long run.

how much do you edit your posts when you write?

What is that supposed to achieve?
To answer your question, whenever a new post is made, I edit my post accordingly.

[YOLO]

Bacde, what did you get from your reaction test? Do you think Fegelein is scum?