In post 599, Remembrance wrote:Going to say why I support the idea: Because it sounds like fun and we get to fuck with the scum. they'll have to use their brains. and I like the mix up. Those who support it: Why?
Those who don't support it:
Why?
I support it because it protects our most important asset: early night cops. That's pretty much it.
Say x claims N1 cop.
Scum will have to consider killing x. If there are N1 doctors, they will risk their kill failing. If there aren't, the cop will die.
Now if x never claimed, scum will have to kill someone at random, who will most likely not be x. Which means x will investigate without problems.
Point being, early cops might be better protected without claiming.
This plan might work best later, with less people alive. Now there are 13 people alive, meaning 9/10 possible targets for scum (depending on the lynch), so I don't get why we should tell scum who the cop is when they just have 1/9 or 1/10 chance to get it right.
In that case, a N1 doctor might claim, but there might not be N1 cops. Meaning free kill for scum N1 who otherwise could have targetted someone that the unclaimed N1 doctor protected and thus fail.
I think the best thing we can't do is only make the cops claim, so all the available docs for that night if any, will know who to protect but scum will be in the dark if there is any doc for that night or not so they have to take even higher risks.
As scum, you are more passive, though you retain an attacking edge. You like to convince people that you are right, and you often get along with strong town figures.
As town, you are hellbent on lynching the person you deem scummiest.
I'll reread the plan and get back with my thoughts: at this point I think it's too random, but I have a feeling I might be wrong.
In post 144, Human Destroyer wrote:IAI could certainly bus you; his reasoning is weak and could work perfectly well as a quick towncred grab for your scumflip.
So my genius move is to take a 2/2/1 vote and move my partner to the front of the pack and L-4 for D1 towncred? Really????
Also Human, why no read of Bacde by 142? You have a read of me on one post, but nothing on Bacde. I thought his 129 & 131 were telling, but yet he is not in your reads, hmmmm...
******
In post 176, SE-Asians wrote:My answer already answered in my previous previous previous post. Why do you ask?
Here. D6 Innocent Child. Do wish what you like.
With the VT claim, and now this, why are we up to 25 pages??? This should be lynched with fire by now?!?!?