Micro : The Cult 2 (Game Over)

thenewearth · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:16 pm

Actually... A massclaim is OK IMO. Since we need 1 lynch.

That... Or I'm just being stupid today

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:20 pm

Massclaim is a no since this setup is not open.

thenewearth · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:22 pm

Yeah so I'm just being stupid...

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:22 pm

In post 174, Remembrance wrote:Also, if he claimed a PR he might have been auto-lynched.

Lol? Because people totally love lynching PR claims.

It was a fairly obvious claim and it was a big part of my case for him being town (which you didn't comment on at all). So, no, it wasn't anti-town to talk about it.

VOTE: Remembrance

@TNE: No reason to mass claim today.

Remembrance · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:25 pm

No, if he claimed a PR someone might counter claim him. This isn't hard.

thenewearth · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:26 pm

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Remembrance

Guys let's put pressure on remembrance. I think I know how to deal with the likes of him.

'Cause I'm feeling something off about him today.

Remembrance · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:30 pm

In post 180, thenewearth wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Remembrance

Guys let's put pressure on remembrance. I think I know how to deal with the likes of him.

'Cause I'm feeling something off about him today
.

Elaborate.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:31 pm

Gah I'm so conflicting
Rem was like this last time and he was town

Remembrance · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:32 pm

I was town. And the other time I was like this and scram town all day, I also was town. But no one ever believes town remembrance. They only ever believe scum remembrance. Because they're suckers, but can't take a person at their word.

thenewearth · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:33 pm

If I elaborate now then everything that I would say would go null because you can counter them in the near future.

So no

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:35 pm

In post 179, Remembrance wrote:No, if he claimed a PR someone might counter claim him. This isn't hard.

Fine, but my main point was that his claim was less of a claim and more of a subconscious slip. The frustration makes sense for a VT and the claim feels accidental.

And yes PRs won't carry the game on there own (otherwise setup is broken), but why is suggesting a bad policy necessarily scummy?

P-edit: Ya, Remembrance is scum.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:36 pm

In post 184, thenewearth wrote:If I elaborate now then everything that I would say would go null because you can counter them in the near future.

So no

Remembrance · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:38 pm

In post 185, AngryPidgeon wrote:
In post 179, Remembrance wrote:No, if he claimed a PR someone might counter claim him. This isn't hard.

Fine, but my main point was that his claim was less of a claim and more of a subconscious slip. The frustration makes sense for a VT and the claim feels accidental.

And yes PRs won't carry the game on there own (otherwise setup is broken),
but why is suggesting a bad policy necessarily scummy?

P-edit: Ya, Remembrance is scum.

What do you mean?

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:44 pm

In post 149, Remembrance wrote:He'd rather power roles do their thing, (but what is likelihood the power roles will win the game for us?)

Is KidA more scummy for suggesting we rely on PRs?

Remembrance · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:52 pm

Hmm, is he? Basically, I was complaining. He should be scum hunting not relying on PR's.

Remembrance · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:07 pm

Especially because, like you've been saying (and I've agreed with) we can win day one. But he's okay with dying, to get the PR's to win it for him?

Illogical. The very line of thinking makes me think he's bluffing. Because it makes no sense from a town perspective.

the game gets more difficult to win as days go by.

Deltabacon · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:18 pm

I can only apologise for the earlier drunkpost - it won't be happening again.

thenewearth · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:22 pm

In post 191, Deltabacon wrote:I can only apologise for the earlier drunkpost - it won't be happening again.

How did I know that was a drunken post...

Remembrance · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:29 pm

In post 170, Deltabacon wrote:I thjink Punhel is sxum. SHWWP IT.

Does that mean Delta is town? Hrm, I wonder how drunken posting works.

thenewearth · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:32 pm

Because drunk people tend to say the truth without them knowing. And it's hard to fake being drunk.

Don't get the idea of drunk posting. It's rude. Respect the drunk people

Deltabacon · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:51 pm

You can disregard it if you want, because even I can't translate the second sentence. :/

RandomYoshi · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:13 pm

In post 170, Deltabacon wrote:I think PimHel is sxum. STOP IT.

Probably fixed.

thenewearth · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:30 pm

I thought it said "I think pimhel is scum.

SHUUT IT

Remembrance · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:51 pm

@Delta, where did you go to get drunk? What did you drink?

Remembrance · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:53 pm

Let me say this better:

1. Where did you go to drink (I mean, a bar, or at home, etcetera).
2. What brand of drink did you have?
3. Why did you drink so much?

Feel free to be vague about these questions, if personal/or uncomfortable.