Royal Family Mafia - Game Over!

[HackerHuck]

@ IH : Why did you FOS HackerHuck for suggesting that everyone posts their top 2 or 3 suspects?...It seems that he is suggesting the same thing as Pooky just suggested (in a more straight forward way of course) and you followed the whole Pooky idea?

Thanks for repeating Ether!

nah, seriously though. I've seen Pooky make a proposal like this before. (Cites Open 6, Nightless) He's asked questions/made proposals like this before, so I answered, but I see red flags when someone just asks for it.

Not only that, Hackerhuck and Jack both refused to answer the questions, but supported everyone listing who their top 2 suspects were.

"Forming a coalition is stupid, but answer that last one for us anyways"

Wow, I get an FOS because I don't answer the useless questions at the front of the list, but I do answer the only relevant question asked. How am I trying to see which way the wind blows when I actually posted who I thought my top two were?

Please note that I had already "answered" Pooky's final question by having a no-longer-random vote on someone.

My top three are now

LL, IH, and CES

[IH]

Wow, I get an FOS because I don't answer the useless questions at the front of the list, but I do answer the only relevant question asked. How am I trying to see which way the wind blows when I actually posted who I thought my top two were?

That, my friend, is a logical fallacy, is it not?

"Why would I ask a scummy question, if I answered it?"

[IH]

....Err, I phrased that wrong.

"Why would I try to find that information, when I already put down mine!"

A convenient breeze through other's posts, and your suspicion changes. I will get off your back if you explain your top three suspicions though. That is all.

[IH]

X_X Last one I swear, since I didn't answer why your question was scummier than Pooky's.

After this lynch, you're all setup for day two on whom to cast suspicon on, could you not?

Also, my above question stands.

[Zindaras]

Unvote, Vote: IH

"Hey, let's not give opinions anymore so the Mafia can't use them against us!"

I've expressed suspicion regarding him before, and what he just said was the last drop.

[Twito]

It's cool how everyone phrases what other one says in more understandable way.

[HackerHuck]

....Err, I phrased that wrong.

"Why would I try to find that information, when I already put down mine!"

A convenient breeze through other's posts, and your suspicion changes. I will get off your back if you explain your top three suspicions though. That is all.

Err, you still phrased it wrong. Since you'll get off my back for explaining my reasons, I won't make you go back and find my earlier posts.

I have a vote on Luckay and I placed an FOS on CES, so I have been open with my suspicion on those two. That said, I'm waiting for the wind to blow before I change my mind. I'll probably also decide my day two lynch target today after everyone tells me who their top two scum are. That way I'll be first on the bandwagon and indisputably prove my townhood.

LuckayLuck

. I don't think his playstyle has been helpful to the town. See post 305 He seems to have softened a bit lately; however, my vote still stands on him.

CES

. I really don't like how he voted for Canucklehead, admitted he had no valid reason and then never pulled his vote. See posts 376 and 377

IH

. You misrepresented my actions - bolded text in this post

Thanks for repeating Ether!

nah, seriously though. I've seen Pooky make a proposal like this before. (Cites Open 6, Nightless) He's asked questions/made proposals like this before, so I answered, but I see red flags when someone just asks for it.

Not only that, Hackerhuck and Jack both refused to answer the questions, but supported everyone listing who their top 2 suspects were.

"Forming a coalition is stupid, but answer that last one for us anyways"

and I don't like how you call me out as potential scum for doing basically the same thing as Pooky (which you happily followed along with even though my idea was two or three times better).

[Save The Dragons]

1)Why do you want to join TWMotW?

No reason not to, also i want cookies.

2)What special skills or talents do you bring to TWMotW?

Dragon saving skillz

3)What is your favorite brand of cereal?

I like a lot. Maybe cinnamon toast crunch...or waffle crisp...or peanut butter crunch

4)Why should we accept you as a member of TWMotW?

Cuz I'm pretty spiffy.

5)Do you have any previous experience with superhero teams?

no

6)If a Supervillian that you can easily defeat is holding hostage two children and threatens to kill them unless you surrender and throw the secret item that grants you all your powers into the ditch of no return what do you do?

Use my powers so skillfully that the villian won't know what hit him, and save the children in the process.

7)If you had the power of "King"(similar to Kingmaker games, the King is the only voter and the final decider of the lynch) who would you choose to lynch at this moment?

Canucklehead

[Jack]

Not only that, Hackerhuck and Jack both refused to answer the questions,

but supported everyone listing who their top 2 suspects were.

No I didn't actually. I still don't see the point. Generally people vote for who they suspect.

Also, as scum I don't pay attention to 'who the town suspects' so I don't find pooky or HackerHuck's suggestions scummy.

[Maz Medias]

I'll answer 7) with Canuckle.

[IH]

and I don't like how you call me out as potential scum for doing basically the same thing as Pooky (which you happily followed along with even though my idea was two or three times better).

That, my friend, is a matter of opinion = D

[Canucklehead17]

I'll answer 7) with Canuckle.

*grins* Feeling a little closed mouthed lately Maz? I've asked you two or three times to explain yourself, and that's allllll you can say.

Confirm Vote: Maz Medias

[the silent speaker]

Ether -- because I haven't had time yet to go over the whole thread and decide who I really really want to lynch. I guess I could have answered, "If I were king, day would still go on for a bit," but that isn't really the sort of thing he's looking for.

[Mastermind of Sin]

You consider the question of "who would you lynch, right now, if the decision were yours and yours alone?" a time waster?

Well...we could just, you know,

VOTE

for people.

Hence why my vote is on you.

You consider the question of "who would you lynch, right now, if the decision were yours and yours alone?" a time waster?

Well...we could just, you know,

VOTE

for people.

QFT


I really don't see how this will accomplish consensus and save us time. If everyone provided a list of their top two/three scum, that might narrow it down to a few suspects that most people have on their list, rather than the broad group we'll get if everyone just puts out one name.

Besides, who wants to join the group if you're going to let the scum join too?

My top two are LL and CES.

unvote, vote: HackerHuck

Town shouldn't really be concerned about "saving time", since the longer the days are with reasonable activity, the better. Only scum want to hurry along the game, so they can rush people into decisions that aren't beneficial to the town.

[IH]

(Feels the OMGUS from HH For the record)

[Maz Medias]

I'll answer 7) with Canuckle.

*grins* Feeling a little closed mouthed lately Maz? I've asked you two or three times to explain yourself, and that's allllll you can say.

Confirm Vote: Maz Medias

I explained myself when I voted for you. If you're too lazy to change pages, you don't deserve my conversation.

[Cardinal Ibelly]

The Official “Paint the Roses Red!” Vote Count!

Canucklehead17 - 6 - Maz Medias, Fritzler, Save the Dragons, Arafax, Bogre, Cogito Ergo Sum

Bogre – 3 – LuckayLuck, Twito, PookyTheMagicalBear
IH – 3 – Jack, Ether, Zindaras
Twito – 3 – the silent speaker, Thok, Mariyta

LuckayLuck – 2 – HackerHuck, TheEyeofMordor

Arafax – 1 – IH
HackerHuck – 1 – Mastermind of Sin
Maz Medias – 1 – Canucklehead17
the silent speaker – 1 – VitaminR

With

22

alive, it takes

12

to be

OFF WITH THEIR HEAD!

Hiding in the rabbit hole – 1 – Nightson

[HackerHuck]

I'll answer 7) with Canuckle.

*grins* Feeling a little closed mouthed lately Maz? I've asked you two or three times to explain yourself, and that's allllll you can say.

Confirm Vote: Maz Medias

I explained myself when I voted for you. If you're too lazy to change pages, you don't deserve my conversation.

As annoying as Maz can be, he is right in this case. When I did my last reread, I spotted two places where he explained his actions. I would say the ball's in your court now.

Vote: Canucklehead17

for blatantly trying to set up a 1-2 mislynch.

Oh, let me further explain my vote on you, Canucklescum.

You were blatantly attempting to set up a 1-2 mislynch on Jack-->LL. Rather than defending yourself when I called you on it, you dismissed the attack via ad homming about my post count. You then dropped the argument completely.

Later, you attributed a quote to me when I was not the one who said it, and again never mentioned it again once I pointed that out.

You are evasive, deflective, clueless, transparent, and deserve to die.

[IH]

To offset that though.

I want out of this game if ridiculous time-wasters like Pooky's scheme are going to control it.

I'll answer 7) with Canuckle.

It's a ridiculous time waster, but he did deem it necessary to answer some of it, or perhaps he thought this was the only thing worth answering.

[Jack]

To offset that though.

I want out of this game if ridiculous time-wasters like Pooky's scheme are going to control it.

I'll answer 7) with Canuckle.

It's a ridiculous time waster, but he did deem it necessary to answer some of it, or perhaps he thought this was the only thing worth answering.

What's your point?

[Maz Medias]

I answered 7 because I had not previously read the questions - I dismissed them since, you know, Pooky's schemes are generally timewasting jokes. Noticing a game-relevant question, I answered that one, and that one alone, because that one alone deserved an answer.

[Canucklehead17]

I'll answer 7) with Canuckle.

*grins* Feeling a little closed mouthed lately Maz? I've asked you two or three times to explain yourself, and that's allllll you can say.

Confirm Vote: Maz Medias

I explained myself when I voted for you. If you're too lazy to change pages, you don't deserve my conversation.

As annoying as Maz can be, he is right in this case. When I did my last reread, I spotted two places where he explained his actions. I would say the ball's in your court now.

Vote: Canucklehead17

for blatantly trying to set up a 1-2 mislynch.

Oh, let me further explain my vote on you, Canucklescum.

You were blatantly attempting to set up a 1-2 mislynch on Jack-->LL. Rather than defending yourself when I called you on it, you dismissed the attack via ad homming about my post count. You then dropped the argument completely.

Later, you attributed a quote to me when I was not the one who said it, and again never mentioned it again once I pointed that out.

You are evasive, deflective, clueless, transparent, and deserve to die.

*sigh* But I posted

back

to him afterwards, and he has yet to answer that. I attacked his arguments against me, and he has yet to answer to those! Here is the link to my post: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=400

Scroll down to post 471. Maz has NOT answered that post yet.

[Canucklehead17]

EBQOP - That's post 421, not 471.

[Canucklehead17]

and that should be EBWOP, not EBQOP.

[Maz Medias]

ust because I'm not telling you my thoughts doesn't mean I'm not reading that thread and trying to determine who the scum are (rather than the townies, which is an illogical method).

Well, that's very interesting. Cause I could've sworn that it was quite expected that each and every player should contribute to the game as much as possible. Hum, but somehow you get the free pass to just watch and contribute little. I didn't know, please accept my apologies, it was my mistake.

It's day one, and as you would know if you'd taken the time to do your homwork, I don't contribute to the clusterfuck that is such unless I see someone who really stands out in their scumminess - i.e., you, Mr. Mislynch.

You were blatantly attempting to set up a 1-2 mislynch on Jack-->LL. Rather than defending yourself when I called you on it, you dismissed the attack via ad homming about my post count.

Say Maz, are you sure you've got that straight? You know what actually happened? I didn't think you did.

STD and I went into this looong discussion about that very accusation. If you would like to see my explanation, I suggest you go back and read my lovely chat with STD. I DID address the issue, but I DIDN'T address it to you. Reason being, as I've stated before, you simply sit around and post these little one and two liners, with no substance whatsoever. But the issue was addressed. I'm so sorry you were offended that I didn't speak directly to YOU.

I missed that part where you changed the fact that you tried to set up the 1-2.

Oh, wait. It didn't exist.

Later, you attributed a quote to me when I was not the one who said it, and again never mentioned it again once I pointed that out.

I'm sorry, but I don't remember that. If you will please tell me where that is, I will gladly correct the situation.

And finally, I get to address that ever so nice last line of yours.

Blind? I'm not holding your hand.

You are evasive

Am I? I think I've answered every accusation so far, save the little quote issue you mentioned, and that was simply an oversight(IF it even exists).

You can answer things evasively. That's generally how it's done. For example, this entire post has been "evasive" on the issue of your 1-2 attempt, which - no matter how cutely you explain it away - is scummy as all hell.

deflective

I only deflect incorrect accusations such as yours.

Admission to deflection. I like.

clueless

Actually, judging by what you posted, you're the clueless one.

Am I? It seems like I picked up on a slip by you, and you can't do anything about it except ad hom and pile flowery bullshit into posts.

transparent

Pro-town roles SHOULD be transparent.

And scum shouldn't. That's where you messed up.

and deserve to die.

Actually, you do.

I await your response with great anticipation. :D

I omitted the especially retarded parts, because I didn't want to dignify them with repetition of my responses. For one who criticizes my "one-liners", you sure employ them a lot in your attempted analysis - which, by the way, contains no content whatsoever.

Confirm Vote: Canucklehead17

, and it's not moving.