Okay, reread is finished.
Firstly, Glork, I have to disagree
even more
that Ibby was using “tunnel-vision”. I would like people to read
Post 83 up until Post 102. I don’t consider that “tunnel-vision” whatsoever: that is definitely pursuing somebody who
just did something scummy
. If Ibby says Glork was scum the last time she saw Glork try to pull what he did in Post 83/85, I’m glad she didn’t just let it drop for the remainder of her posts. Ignoring something like that is a good way to let Glork get away with whatever he wants (which is apparently one of his goals: to see just how stupid he can be in the same game and pull it off without getting lynched for it).
Immediately after that debacle, Glork immediately has a preposterous exchange of posts with Nightson, starting from
Post 116 to Post 125. Once again,
a short string of posts
where Ibby is pursuing Glork for being scummy
again
.
Vote: Glork
. I can’t believe you are calling that tunnel-vision. At all. Were you expecting Ibby to do nothing?
After I replace into the game, he comes up with a “tell” on Ibby
after Ibby was no longer posting
(as she announced was going to happen in Post 161), so she could not try and refute him. Now he has been pushing on this “tell”, and when I asked him to clarify on the difference between “not getting off of Glork” and “Ibby stayed on Glork”, he responds:
Glork wrote:I already know you're not going to like this, but... I can't really. It's one of those intangible hunch/gut things. It's just in the language (manner) Ibby used. Her posts felt forced/contrived.
He can’t. I think I’ve caught him trying to make up a false “tell” on Ibby in order to push a lynch on me, whether it be today, or later in the game. He also claims that Ibby was “going out of her way to justify her Glork-vote”, when it more the fact that Glork kept continually doing things which deserved a vote.
As if it were even necessary, this post interests me very much, now:
InHimShallIBe, Post 139 wrote:Oh, those stalling lynches... the tales they tell.
This was during the time votes were coming off of MBL and onto Bird1111. I have caught scum trying to do these types of posts before: they try to make the new wagon look bad.
This makes me double-think Zindaras’ theory. It is more than possible that we are dealing with InHim + Bird1111 scum, and that
MrBuddyLee was not part of the scum-group
, at least at the time. He could have been a traitor waiting to be recruited, or perhaps part of a different scum group. Both InHim and Bird1111 put MBL at lynch -1, which goes against them being partners, and InHim tried to direct the lynch
towards
MBL (who I would consider a strong scum-partner) and
away
from Bird1111 (who I would consider a weak scum-partner). Also, MBL went out of his way to slap his vote onto InHim in
Post 156. I don’t think it is appropriate to make decisions based on this theory, but I do think it is worth enough merit that I will consider it a more than viable possibility. I’m glad Zindie brought it up.
Oh, special note. People should pay attention to
Post 188, which is once again, by Glork. Here, he:
1.) Attacks Ibby after she had already announced she would be absent
2.) Calls StD for a “false dilemma” when StD says at least one of “InHim + Bird1111” are scum. Hmm. Bird1111 has already turned up as scum, and InHim certainly looks like he will be turning up scum. Now I see that both InHim and Glork are attacking me/Ibby. I’m doubting this is coincidental, at this point.
Also, very noteworthy: if MBL was not part of the scum-group, it would
also
fit in with an InHim + Bird + Glork scumgroup. I think this game is going to be a piece of cake, at this rate.
Actually, another possibility just occurred to me. It could be the case that MBL was not scum at all, but was instead targeted by a “scum janitor”, or whatever they’re called. In other words, a role which makes pro-town people turn up as scum when they die. After Glork went to all that trouble to connect me to MBL yesterday, then MBL is only death last night turning up “Gorilla”, and then Glork and InHim both start attacking me as soon as the gates open while trying to squash speculation on why scum supposedly died on a night with one nightkill. Definitely thinking something is up, here.
I’m still a little weirded out by Nightson’s play and interactions with Glork, but I will consider him a tertiary target at this time. I also had a few vibes from Klebian and Dahen, but there appears to be plenty of other people to pursue my thoughts for now.
People I think are Scum-Scums
InHimShallIBe
Glork
Nightson
People I would keep an eye on
Klebian
Dahen
People Who are almost Certainly Town
Save the Dragons
I haven’t had very strong “town” readings on anybody, except StD. I would rather go after people I think are scummy than try to find people I think are town anyways.