Mini 387: Suicide Bombers, GAME OVER (at last)!

[The Central Scrutinizer]

But Sherlock is still on the site. Being that it's him, I think it is a scumtell, but as I don't have evidence for it, you may take it as a joke.

To be perfectly frank, I'm more inclined to look at -you- for how you ran with it so far.

Yes, please do something like this.

Are you serious? There could be a dozen different reasons that he asked to be replaced, starting with "I'm too busy."

HoS: Kelly Chen

for this blatant badlogic. And what's with all the jumping around? I don't understand what you are doing.

[Kelly Chen]

What do you want to know? I was voting and bickering with CD for most of the week and hardly anyone had anything to say about it. Why don't you tell me what you think about CD's deliberately shoddy case against MSG?

I'd already said why neongrey is suspicious. Just call up her posts and have a look.

I don't think the Sherlock thing is bad logic at all. I wouldn't base a lynch on it but that doesn't mean it's nonsense.

[Twito]

This game listed as boring since I don't have too much time. More or less skipping last few pages.

KC's case is interesting. Seen scum playing bad and feeling threatened and asking to be replaced for that reason. Sherlock idd is around and could do something like this.

I will make more valid post later like monday I guess or so. And see if I can look to this issue with CD aswell and shit.

Oh and just looked back whether I've voted and I seem to have perfectly good vote on ubertimmy the scum. I stick to that one.

[mikeburnfire]

VOTE COUNT

2 ubertimmy (Twito, Tamuz)
2 molestargazer (chaotic_diablo, Save The Dragons)
1 neongrey (ubertimmy, Kelly Chen)
1 Save The Dragons (The Central Scrutinizer)

Not Voting: neongrey, Dead Rikimaru, bird1111, molestargazer, pablito

[pablito]

hmmm...time for a wagon!

1 for ubertimmy, 2 for MSG

Original Roll String: 1d2

1 2-Sided Dice: (2) = 2

[pablito]

vote: molestargazer

[Kelly Chen]

You have to roll again because actually neongrey was at 2 votes too.

[pablito]

good point.

unvote

neongrey is three

Original Roll String: 1d3

1 3-Sided Dice: (1) = 1

[pablito]

vote: ubertimmy

[neongrey]

Yes, please do something like this.

Look, he practically yelled 'look, a distraction!' at you and you not only looked at the distraction, you ambled along after it.

That -is- suspicious to me, on both your parts, him for trying to throw you off track like that, and you for letting him.

[Kelly Chen]

Hmm, is there anything you think he was trying to distract people

from

? You know it's not the stealing analogy that I was after him for.

[chaotic_diablo]

The sherlock replacement issue isn't a big deal.

I'm not seeing how my stealing analogy is a distraction. It's about the only thing anyone has ever bothered to post about.

I don't see how wagoning random people will accomplish anything.

[Kelly Chen]

I'm not seeing how my stealing analogy is a distraction. It's about the only thing anyone has ever bothered to post about.

So vote neongrey for calling it a distraction when she could as easily have commented on the thing you were

getting at

with the analogy.

I never even commented on your analogies. What is this post talking about?:

Look, he practically yelled 'look, a distraction!' at you and you not only looked at the distraction, you ambled along after it.

That -is- suspicious to me, on both your parts, him for trying to throw you off track like that, and you for letting him.

[chaotic_diablo]

And then there are the people who don't bother to comment at all.

Prods requested.

[Kelly Chen]

But at least those people don't create the appearance that they are contributing without actually doing so. THAT is what I'm saying is scummy.

[chaotic_diablo]

I'm more interested in getting those lurkers to post. Pretending to contribute while not doing so is scummy, but I'm not ready to vote based on that until I hear more from everyone else.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm here, still trying to figure out why everyone is so anxious to vote MSG, timmy, or neongrey.

[mikeburnfire]

I hace prodded everyone who has not posted since Tuesday. This includes Save The Dragons, bird1111, ubertimmy, and molestargazer. I am still looking to replace Tamuz. Deadline i still on the 22nd, though. If a majority has not been reached at deadline then your lynch is forfeited.

[molestargazer]

Whoops!

Sorry all!

pablito, I think that that vote (which is almost random) doesn't seem helpful in this stage of the game. Surely we need to find who's the scummiest and get this day over with before the deadline, not pick off those who have been voted on before, randomly with a dice roll.

[Dead Rikimaru]

We are four days away from the deadline and we need a majority for a lynch.
It's time to check the current bandwagons to choose the best one.

*checks previous posts from ubertimmy, molestargazer and neongrey*

It's not because he already has the most votes, and it's not a random choice.
Between Oct 28 and Dec 10 ubertimmy posted 7 times with no content whatsoever.
According to the mod he has been prodded but hasn't posted in the last 8 days while posting frequently on other games.

This was his last post:

im very confused. i'll reread.

I think he is by far the best lynch among the three.

vote: ubertimmy

[Kelly Chen]

unvote, vote: ubertimmy

This entire game's defense of neongrey is noted.

[neongrey]

I don't know that he's the best choice, but it's not like we've got a lot of time to mess around.

vote: ubertimmy

[chaotic_diablo]

unvote

vote ubertimmy

That's a lynch I think.

[Twito]

I don't see how wagoning random people will accomplish anything.

Me yes.

[Twito]

Hehe he is dead. With 4 days remaining he could have claimed but I don't really mind.
Didn't have time for making that re-read.