oh and
if PookyTheMagicalBear gets lynched, and he's town, & you're Mafia, then i would think that would be gaining a significant advantage...
this is what i responded to in my last post when i saidDirge wrote:Wouldn't taking "advantage" of something mean that I have gained an "advantage"?
- Post #926LyingBrian wrote:if PookyTheMagicalBear gets lynched, and he's town, & you're Mafia, then i would think that would be gaining a significant advantage...
where the heck did you get that?!? my vote is currently on Dirge...Atticus wrote:But LB, you seem to be giving off an air of, "Well, I'm about to lynch Pooky to prove that he's a good guy"
please reiterate, b/c i missed them even after doing a quick re-read... repeat them for me (or give me the post #s), and i'll gladly answer them...Dirge wrote:Lying Brian's not answering two direct questions noted...
i think there was a serious misunderstanding w/ Post #925...Anonymities wrote:Your scheme to lynch pooky to prove that he is town is just downright scummy.
was directed at Atticus,LyingBrian wrote:Atticus' defense of Dirge noted...
was my playing a card, as far asLyingBrian wrote:oh andI'm The Boss
if PookyTheMagicalBear gets lynched, and he's town, & you're Mafia, then i would think that would be gaining a significant advantage...
The second question you addressed but didn't answer.Dirge wrote:Can you point to something that I'm doing different now that I wasn't doing before Pooky blew up? Wouldn't taking "advantage" of something mean that I have gained an "advantage"? I think all I have done was reiterate the same thing over and over. Nothing has changed.
did you read my post #929? it was not a random statement, but also it was not saying that i felt lynching PookyTheMagicalBear would prove anything...Atticus wrote:Either this was a completely random comment, or you felt that lynching Pooky would prove something.
Dirge wrote:Wouldn't taking "advantage" of something mean that I have gained an "advantage"?
ok, i'm still not fully understanding exactly what you want, but i'll try again... yes, taking "advantage" of something would mean that you are gaining an "advantage"... and that "advantage" would be getting PookyTheMagicalBear lynched, and removing a pro-town player from the game... hopefully that's clear enough for you, but let me know if you need further illumination...Dirge wrote:The second question you addressed but didn't answer.
Hey, just check Pooky's earlier answers to Dirge's repeats and you're good to go.Atticus wrote:And olio just lost us the chance of Pooky responding straightly to Dirge.
You failed to answer the first question. Presumably because you're just pulling this stuff out of your hole. And as to the second question, you are essentially saying that I'm suspicious for doing something that I'm not doing. You make no sense. Unfortunately, you're the Boss.LyingBrian wrote:... yes, taking "advantage" of something would mean that you are gaining an "advantage"... and that "advantage" would be getting PookyTheMagicalBear lynched, and removing a pro-town player from the game... hopefully that's clear enough for you, but let me know if you need further illumination...
1. It's not what you or I say it's what Pooky says. He made it sound like MeMe lead a charge against him then later said that she had to hedge her attack because of her position. The two don't go together. If you go back you'll see that Pooky only got close because it was near deadline and most players like to have info from a lynch and they were not influence by MeMe as Pooky implied. Pooky is smart enough to know this therefore he is lying to say otherwise.olio wrote:1. It's not what I'm talking about here. You say Pooky lied about there being pressure from MeMe against him, I say MeMe pressured Pooky, based on her votes.
2. No, I don't think it's strong and I've never said it was a strong case. Where did you get that idea? You say it's a weak case and I think you're wrong. It's not black and white like you're trying to exaggarate it into.
3. Why are you fishing for a cop?
I didn't quite get that. Can you elaborate?Atticus wrote:Honestly olio, if you expect to beleive you're another person...
1. Actually, in my opinion it's about you. In my opinion there was pressure from MeMe, whereas you toot your horn about Pooky lying about that pressure. How can you be so certain MeMe didn't influence other players? She's a pro player after all.Dirge wrote: 1. It's not what you or I say it's what Pooky says. He made it sound like MeMe lead a charge against him then later said that she had to hedge her attack because of her position. The two don't go together. If you go back you'll see that Pooky only got close because it was near deadline and most players like to have info from a lynch and they were not influence by MeMe as Pooky implied. Pooky is smart enough to know this therefore he is lying to say otherwise.
2. You don't think Pooky's case is strong, you don't think it's weak. Do you think that it's good enough to lynch two players on consecutive days? Pooky thinks so.
3. No. My point is why are you all defending and deferring to Pooky?
1. How can you think that all that was due to MeMe and had nothing to do with deadline? MeMe is a pro, but as Pooky stated her hands were tied. Do you think that I am incorrect to think that those votes could have come from a desire to get information?olio wrote:1. Actually, in my opinion it's about you. In my opinion there was pressure from MeMe, whereas you toot your horn about Pooky lying about that pressure. How can you be so certain MeMe didn't influence other players? She's a pro player after all.
2. We were talking about one case here, the case against Fishbulb, right?
3. So why didn't you ask it straigth away? I'm attackingyourweak case against him and you see it as defending Pooky. Shouldn't I point out weaknesses in your case no matter who you direct it against, weaknesses, which there are many in my opinion?
If you really wanted to know about why "I'm defending and deferring to Pooky" (like you put it), how on earth you missed my vote on you? That would've answered your question right away. You were just trying to fish for a cop, like you're fishing with LyingBrian too.
And sorry olio.olio wrote:...Atticus wrote:And olio just lost us the chance of Pooky responding straightly to Dirge.
1. It's not what I'm talking about here. You say Pooky lied about there being pressure from MeMe against him, I say MeMe pressured Pooky, based on her votes.
2. No, I don't think it's strong and I've never said it was a strong case. Where did you get that idea? You say it's a weak case and I think you're wrong. It's not black and white like you're trying to exaggarate it into.
3. Why are you fishing for a cop?