I want to knock off you and I sure as hell don't mean ignore you for the rest of the game. Forgive me if I fail to see the connection between the two terms.Canucklehead17 wrote:It was bad terminology to say I wanted to "knock off LL". What I meant is putting all his "Townie Tells" and "Scum Tells" behind us, and paying them no heed from henceforth.
True dat. Like I said, I'm not coming after you for what you said.Canucklehead17 wrote:I beg your pardon, but you were SUSPICIOUS of Jack, and your SUSPICIONS only confirmed MINE. So, I voted for Jack, and explained why, and suddenly your my SCAPEGOAT?
Picture this. Johny says, "The moon is made of green cheese!"
Nathan says, "I agree! Johny said it, so it must be true!"
In this case, Nathan is not saying that he believes the moon is made of green cheese, but that Johny is correct. That way, when Johny is shot down, Nathan can blame Johny.
In any case, one of us voted for Jack, while one of us didn't. I was actually more inclined to vig Jack based on apparently poor + possibly scummy play.
C to the nuckle to the head wrote:Umm, yeah? Isn't that what I already said? I think I specifically said that I was trying out LL's "Townie Tells", and if they were wrong, then we could officially forget about LL.
So you think it's better to lose control of your own thoughts just to prove someone wrong?
"I'm going to prove to people that cars are dangerous by letting go of the wheel and pedals in the middle of the freeway! It's the car's fault if I screw people over!"
BTW,
Nothing wrong with defending your position. Nothing wrong with siding with someone. Nothing wrong with saying someone else's reasons. Something wrong with setting up the other person with the fall. This point is not my strongest against you, but coupled with "knock off" and "regret," this paints a telling picture.CaKNUCKLE wrote:WRONG. You can translate that, rather, that I was using your suspicions to explain my vote. Which(and gee, I guess I was wrong), I thought you were supposed to defend your postition.
It is interesting to note that you regret getting caught rather than regret possibly icing a townie to prove your point.Canucklehead wrote:WRONG again. I said I may end up regretting it cause I figured there would be someone like YOU and Maz out there who'd find it suddenly suspicious. But I had(and have) my suspicions, and I stood and stand by them.
In fact, you seem to be weilding a double-edged sword.
Either Jack is scum and you're following me, or Jack is a townie and you want to prove LL wrong.
But instead, you've taken initiative to cover your own ass.
You use a WIFOM to defend yourself, you appeal to emotion, and your use of n00b is intreguing.Canucklehead17 wrote:Now, I know this may only further suspicions against me, but I won't sit around while people mis-interpret my posts. Don't you THINK if I was scum I'd be a bit more careful? Sure, I've only played online mafia for a couple of months, but I've been scum in other games, and through several days, no one has a clue. I KNOW what I'm doing, so don't give me the "oh, the newb is scum, so he slipped up" crap.
First of all, I'm unaware of anyone hosing you because you are a n00b.
Second of all, you have been very careful. I'd say you've gone under my radar for most of the game until that point.
Third of all, when people are scum, they make mistakes. When people are townies, they make mistakes. I can't say for sure, but the fact you say "I made a mistake in my wording" makes me think you're backtracking. Because it would be a good idea to discredit/remove LL as town if he's leading the town astray.
My roomate is running in and out of the room...anyway...that is all for now.