Royal Family Mafia - Game Over!

[Twito]

I'm not insisting that we lynch LL if Jack turns out to be townie, but it seemed to me that you and many others wouldn't have a problem with it.

Before I wouldn't have had a problem with it but I though of more interesting way to play this game.

[Twito]

Either way, if Jack turns out to be townie, LL will have lost credibility and we can all shut him out the rest of the game.

Now that you mention it if that happens againts what LL says it's obvious that mod has made a mistake since LL can't be wrong.

[Maz Medias]

Vote: Canucklehead17

for blatantly trying to set up a 1-2 mislynch.

[Twito]

@Ether: Why am I eager to lynch? Maybe because we've been in day one for A MONTH?

Month of many server problems and stuff. And we are only on page 10.

It's fun to make seperate small posts instead of bigones.

[Cardinal Ibelly]

The Official “There’s Something Stuck Up in the Chimney!” Vote Count!

Jack – 5 – LuckayLuck, Twito, Canucklehead17, Ether, IH
LuckayLuck – 3 – HackerHuck, TheEyeofMordor, Jack

Ether – 2 – Bogre, Cogito Ergo Sum
IH – 2 – Nightson, Save The Dragons
Twito – 2 – the silent speaker, Fritzler

Arafax – 1 – PookyTheMagicalBear
bird1111 – 1 – bird1111
Canucklehead17 - 1 - Maz Medias
HackerHuck – 1 – Thok
Mariyta – 1- Arafax
the silent speaker – 1 – VitaminR

With

22

alive, it takes

12

to use a poker on somebody.

Don’t know what it [voting] is – 2 – Mariyta, Sotty7

[Mariyta]

Vote IH

[the silent speaker]

1. LL keeps going on and on about knowing who's townie and who's not. Obviously, as we all know, the odds of lynching scum on the first day are low. So if LL is sooo positive that he(she)'s right, then why not give it a chance? If Jack turns out to be a townie, then

we can finally have a reason to knock off LL.

This really

really

looks like a slip from someone looking for a way to have LL killed. MAJOR ping on my scumdar. Also, "I was using your logic! WHY DO YOU FOS ME?" reads like an ingratiation attempt. Second, smaller ping.

FOS:Canucklehead

.

And Jack, I dispute the assertion that we will learn very much at all from a LLLynch. I, and most people here it seems, have him penciled as a loud but uninformed townie.
P.S. You wuss. I've seen Day Ones that went a month

without

the board crashing.

Mariyta: why vote IH?

[IH]

@Ether: Why am I eager to lynch? Maybe because we've been in day one for A MONTH? As I said before I don't think there's enough information to make a decision, if you try too hard to find scum this turn you're just going to bias yourself. Or at least I will, I tend to do that. So we lynch someone whose identity will tell us a lot. Simple.

No, No, and NO! Day 1 play started on Friday November the 17th, not taking into account the odd crash here and there.

Mariyta: why vote IH?

[Canucklehead17]

Vote: Canucklehead17

for blatantly trying to set up a 1-2 mislynch.

Yes, thank you. And this is what? Your 2nd post in the thread?

Uh huh.

I wouldn't do that, I'm scum PRODIGY, remember?

[Mariyta]

Mariyta: why vote IH?

Out of the top 5 votees, he's the only one I really feel could be scum. LL and Twito are annoying, but I don't think they're scum. Jack and Ether haven't done anything to make me feel they're scum either. I'm more happy with an IH or Canucklehead lynch right now.

[IH]

....I'm bothered by this statement....

Out of the top 5 votees

Are you looking at anyone else, or just trying to go for an easy lynch that "feels like scum". Just looking at the top 5. Even more.... are you basing your suspicions from vote counts?

HoS:Mariyta

(How exciting, my first hand of suspicion)

[Mariyta]

....I'm bothered by this statement....

Out of the top 5 votees

Are you looking at anyone else, or just trying to go for an easy lynch that "feels like scum". Just looking at the top 5. Even more.... are you basing your suspicions from vote counts?

HoS:Mariyta

(How exciting, my first hand of suspicion)

Of course you're bothered by it; you're the one I voted...

[Jack]

And Jack, I dispute the assertion that we will learn very much at all from a LLLynch. I, and most people here it seems, have him penciled as a loud but uninformed townie.
P.S. You wuss. I've seen Day Ones that went a month

without

the board crashing.

Maybe I should have read more of the posts then. Meh.

unvote

The other forum I play on has 24 hour days so I guess I'm spoiled.

No, No, and NO! Day 1 play started on Friday November the 17th, not taking into account the odd crash here and there.

details, details.

[IH]

Mariyta, I will retract my very first Hand of Suspicion when you provide reasons for why your vote is on me. Why do you get a scummy feel of me? It just seems like a convenient way for you to jump on a bandwagon without raising to much of a fuss.

When I see someone voting for me, I like to see reasons why, if there are none there, I ask for some. Sometimes I can catch someone who just has me (or anyone else voted) for absolutley no reason at all.

details, details.

They're what makes the game go round = D

Actually Jack, they are important details. Your defense of pushing for a day 1 lynch is that the day has gone on too long. In all actuality, the game has probably gone on around.... 2 weeks. Also yes, you are a wuss, in my first game day 1 went on twelve pages in around a month in a half, 2 months.

[Jack]

Patience is a sin.

err, or something like that.

[IH]

Patience is a virtue perhaps? = D This reminds me of something.

They tried to make themselves wise, but became fools

[Maz Medias]

Vote: Canucklehead17

for blatantly trying to set up a 1-2 mislynch.

Yes, thank you. And this is what? Your 2nd post in the thread?

Uh huh.

I wouldn't do that, I'm scum PRODIGY, remember? :roll:

Oh, I completely forgot how post count has any influence on the validity of my point!

Silly me!

[Canucklehead17]

Maybe it means you haven't been participating??

And then maybe it means that you suddenly come in and vote, with very little contribution to the whole game??

[IH]

Canuckle, it is true that Maz was lurking, but he brings up a valid point. That doesn't eliminate what YOU have done. Not to mention that yesterday, Maz showed up saying that he was prodded and rereading.

[Arafax]

Unvote Mariyta - Vote Canucklehead17

I was slightly suspicious of him earlier and his recent exchange w/Maz Medias strikes me as overly defensive...I don't think that pro-town people need to be so defensive; especially with 1 vote.

I'm not sure of what to think about LuckayLuck; really could go either way easily IMO...So I would rather tackle that one later on...I'm not finding anyone else suspicious at the moment either.

[Fritzler]

man, tss and maz suck

i was totally goign to bring the 1-2 in

woe

unvote, vote: canucklehead

[Canucklehead17]

Hmm, I wasn't really being defensive at the vote...I believe I had another already.

What I was being defensive at was that his reason for voting for me was something I had already addressed. But for some reason, it wasn't good enough for him. It occurs to me that he may not have even read my explanation.

[Canucklehead17]

But you're prolly right, people are gonna jump on me for being defensive.

If it goes much further I'll RC.

[LuckayLuck]

Announcement: I am likely to lie low / observe until the folowing conditions are met:

1) One of the people who return from being inactive are replaced / people who I've requeted post more, post more on my chart give off mafia or townie tells.

2) Somebody reaches 8 votes for lynch.

PROD REQUEST: bird11111, Nightson, Pooky, Sotty7, and Thok

[LuckayLuck]

I worded the above post really badly. Let me re-do that...


I have done all I can with the information given. To move forward, I'm going to need to look into the inactive people's souls, or have those people I've requested to post more to actually post more so I can see into their souls.

At this moment in time, I like lynching Jack the most, though getting info from those who are inactive will be useful.