In post 99, fuzzybutternut wrote:What's got you set on NS as scum?
I don't think NS is scum.
In post 100, Varsoon wrote:In post 99, fuzzybutternut wrote:What's got you set on NS as scum?
I don't think NS is scum.
RandomYoshi wrote:
Excuse me, but I have no clue on what terse and succinct means. I'm not a native speaker of English. My Google-searches hasn't given me much to go with. Mind explaining what they mean?
In post 102, fuzzybutternut wrote:iirc, he's like that in all his games.
In post 105, Nabber wrote:RandomYoshi wrote:
Excuse me, but I have no clue on what terse and succinct means. I'm not a native speaker of English. My Google-searches hasn't given me much to go with. Mind explaining what they mean?
It means not using much wording.
Right now I would vote Kitiekatt if I didn't already have my vote on her. Where has she been? She's made one post and done absolutely nothing else.
In post 81, fuzzybutternut wrote:@ANG- Never think that scum WON'T do something. Ever. Scum are actually more inclined to claim a PR, and I can point you to games where that HAS happened. IF we do have a cop, do not claim if you get an innocent, and if you get a guilty, subtly claim. I made this mistake in a game of mine, and was lynched (town still won though). Keep in mind, this was Day 2. Newb scum are less inclined to do it, but it's still there as an option. Never underestimate scum.
In [url=http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4757676&sid=11d7518674f63d090fab3a75b86b9614#p4757676]post 92[/url], Varsoon wrote:
If a post quota and policy lynches are such a bad idea, his flagrant support of it does seem a bit suspicious.
In [url=http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4757676&sid=11d7518674f63d090fab3a75b86b9614#p4757676]post 92[/url], Varsoon wrote:
Seems all-too-eager to scumhunt, and when Fuzzy entered the thread he was pretty quick to turn things about on me.
In [url=http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4757676&sid=11d7518674f63d090fab3a75b86b9614#p4757676]post 92[/url], Varsoon wrote:
The fact he wants everyone to produce reads factors into my deduction that mafia want town turning on themselves early into the day.
In [url=http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4757676&sid=11d7518674f63d090fab3a75b86b9614#p4757676]post 92[/url], Varsoon wrote:
Honestly, he's given me the most to work with, but he could just be a really anxious town.
In [url=http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4758636&sid=11d7518674f63d090fab3a75b86b9614#p4758636]post 110[/url], Approximately Normal Guy wrote:
I liked him out of the gate, but his read on varsoon seemed to change suddenly when fuzzy came in and voted him. He forgot me in his first post, then suddenly remembered I was his biggest scumread for supporting an idea he also supported. That just doesn't seem natural.
In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4756479#p4756479]post 65[/url], Approximately Normal Guy wrote:Well, kuror0 makes valid points. Forcing people to talk could create unnecessary fluff for scum to hide behind.
In post 111, fuzzybutternut wrote:What do you mean a 1-for-1?
Scum will doto stay alive. If you want proof, go read my Wiki and find the game I was cop in. Another player on here, UN, was scum. I investigated him, got a guilty result, and claimed. He counter-claimed with Doctor.anything
I see what you mean about Yoshi, though. It's more of a newb-tell right now, though.
As far as the "experienced player" thing goes, I've only played 4 games of mafia in my entire life. I suck at this game, to be honest.
It's good to have suspicion of more experienced players though, because they can be very manipulative, especially to someone who isn't experienced at all. Believe me, I just lost a game because scum practically controlled me.
In post 108, Nabber wrote:I guess an inactive is just an inactive, so that's a dead end for now, I suppose.
In post 116, RandomYoshi wrote:In post 108, Nabber wrote:I guess an inactive is just an inactive, so that's a dead end for now, I suppose.
If it wasn't a dead end, where would you have liked the road to go?
So ANG can pass by with saying that having a post quota is a bad idea just because he's agreeing with someone whodidn't vote you? But, when I agree that having it is a bad idea, and the one who I am agreeing with votes you, I am suddenly scummy? Can you explain this?
In post 119, Nabber wrote:I don't think it's exactly a scrum move, but I'm wondering why Normal Guy only included five reads in his analysis a little bit up the page.
In post 113, Approximately Normal Guy wrote:In post 111, fuzzybutternut wrote:What do you mean a 1-for-1?
Scum will doto stay alive. If you want proof, go read my Wiki and find the game I was cop in. Another player on here, UN, was scum. I investigated him, got a guilty result, and claimed. He counter-claimed with Doctor.anything
I see what you mean about Yoshi, though. It's more of a newb-tell right now, though.
As far as the "experienced player" thing goes, I've only played 4 games of mafia in my entire life. I suck at this game, to be honest.
It's good to have suspicion of more experienced players though, because they can be very manipulative, especially to someone who isn't experienced at all. Believe me, I just lost a game because scum practically controlled me.
By a 1-for-1 I meant if some lied about a cop claim and we lynched based on that, it would become obvious who was lying. So, in your example, if you lynch the doctor claim and he flips town, then you lynch the cop claim. If the scum gets caught it's basically trading one town for one scum.