Royal Family Mafia - Game Over!

[Twito]

I'm getting the feeling IH might be scum based on the difference in his post between this game and other game.

[IH]

I still think Vote: TSS is a good target, but I also think vote: IH is a good target too because of his attack on Twito.

How is my attack on Twito any more scummy than your defense of him? I fail to see it.

unvote
Vote: Canucklehead17 "I will jump on the Twito wagon." Oh cmoon this guy is so obviously scum.. DIE SCUM DIE!

If I can't get rid of LL and his headhurting posting style I better just agree with it and follow him like a god. Should be interesting game.

Unvote
VOTE: JACK
Coz LL said so!

I believe Canuckle said "if no one else turns up worse, he would jump on the twito wagon. My vote is happy.

Again, good point, but it still seems a bit jumpy. If, after a little while longer, I see no other reason to vote for anyone else, I will jump on the Twito wagon.

not to mention

I'm getting the feeling IH might be scum based on the difference in his post between this game and other game.

This is a different game Twitio, and is a weak metagaming point. There are other factors in that game, including the point that Luckayluck and his ...'different' playstyle is not there.

[Save The Dragons]

because you say that Twito is doubletalking becuase he said LL was irrational and making his head hurt. Hmmm...you really caught us a scum; you're not scum trying to shove a bad reason down Twitos throat.

[Twito]

I still think Vote: TSS is a good target, but I also think vote: IH is a good target too because of his attack on Twito.

How is my attack on Twito any more scummy than your defense of him? I fail to see it.

Coz I'm pro-town?

[Canucklehead17]

I just realized that the only person on Twito who I haven't townie tell'd is Jack.
Hello, scum.

Unvote

VOTE: JACK

This seriously makes me less likely to vote for Jack out of principle.

I actually LOL'ed.

[IH]

(Refuses to take Twito at his word) You may be protown, but anyone can say it of course.

STD.... you don't think that ANY of Twito's posts are suspicious enough for a day 1 vote? Did you see the response when he didn't get a response from LL? I continue to stick by that it was an opportunity vote, based on he thought he could get an easy lynch.

[Twito]

Would be much more convincing if it didn't happen all the time that I'm though of as a good day1 vote and wagon.

[Save The Dragons]

damn. I forgot to vote for TSS in that last post. Oh well.

Anyway. basically what you're telling me is that "twito's good enough for D1." This is what TSS said about Canuckle. Now, there's good enough for day 1, and there's "i'm scum and I have a flimsy reason for voting." I'm leaning towards TSS as maybe the former, and you're probably in the latter.

Besides. I'm a sucker for people who hose easy targets like Twito.

[IH]

Sorry STD. The only reason that he is ever an easy target is if he set's himself up as one. Did you also forget to vote him in your LAST post?

I don't buy into your logic at all either STD. = / you say you're a sucker for people who hose easy targets like Twito.

For Twito to be an easy target he'd have to have done some scummy things.

I'm asking you if Twito has done anything suspicious in your eyes, especially taking into account this is day 1. I'm asking you if my reason is really that flimsy.

I never said that Twito is good enough for a day 1 lynch. I asked if you thought that any of the things he did were suspicious or not.

[Arafax]

I actually already explained that once in post #110. But...since it's obvious you didn't see it, I'll quote it for you.

I read what you posted...What I'm asking is why you're answering a question that was directed at HackerHuck?...Unless I'm reading this wrong, the question was not directed towards you, so I'm uncertain as to why you replied to it....Maybe (it's quite possible actually) that I'm not seeing the logic here, but help me out.

[Canucklehead17]

Ok, this all goes back to post #78, in which I said:

Well, everyone's methods and 'fishing' are fascinating, but we're still not really finding anyone who's scum yet.

To which Ether responded with:

Canuckle, if you're going to complain, please contribute while you're at it.

I then responded with:

My apologies. It just seems to me that the mafia could be letting everyone "fish" themselves into oblivion.

Remember this, you'll not get a smart mafia to bite when you fish.

And of course, it's always safe to assume the mafia is smarter rather than dumb.

So I was in fact, answering Ether's post to me, not to HackerHuck.

[Canucklehead17]

BTW, you can find Ether's "If you're gonna complain, contribute" bit at Post 89.

[Save The Dragons]

Sorry STD. The only reason that he is ever an easy target is if he set's himself up as one. Did you also forget to vote him in your LAST post?

In every single game? Obv there's either something wrong with our scumdars that doesn't calibrate for Twito because Twito's got this crazy playstyle. I'm not going to sit here and be like, "oh, we can always lynch Twito."

For Twito to be an easy target he'd have to have done some scummy things.

PHAIL! What appears to be scummy is often pro-town players making a mistake or interpreting things differently. N00bs cannot change thier n00biness without playing games, but until they learn, they'll trip the booby traps (tells) that spell out a mislynch day 1. Same with Twito. If you believe what you are saying, you are saying Twito's scum in every single game.

And what appears scummy is not universal. I am trying to tune my scumdar to Twito frequency, and if I use the same frequency I use for 90% of the other players on the site, it's going to be ringing off the hook. I've been there.

Twito's behavior so far has not convinced me that he's pro-town, but he's not close enough to be called scum by me.

[Arafax]

Thanks C-Head.....Still happy with my vote on the Buckeye dancer

[Twito]

First time someone is defending me.. I like this feeling..

[Mariyta]

First time someone is defending me.. I like this feeling..

I wouldn't get too comfy with it. If he turns out to be scum, guess who everyone is going to look at first.

[LuckayLuck]

/blows a kiss to Mariyta

I think you're townie. 8)

[Fritzler]

guyz, jack is town

fyi

[Fritzler]

btw, i love the whole, everyone had one town tell, but jack, so he's scum logic we have going one

sherlock holmes at his finest

[LuckayLuck]

btw, i love the whole, everyone had one town tell, but jack, so he's scum logic we have going one

sherlock holmes at his finest

omg finally I find somebody who believes in my way
Thanks, Fritz

/knows

[Fritzler]

btw, i love the whole, everyone had one town tell, but jack, so he's scum logic we have going one

sherlock holmes at his finest

omg finally I find somebody who believes in my way
Thanks, Fritz

/knows

someone seems to have misplace their sarcasm detector

[LuckayLuck]

/knows

sigh

[Canucklehead17]

My sarcasm detector is working great!!!

*beep beep*

[Jack]

unvote:Twito
Vote:LL

We may as well lynch someone who's been posting a lot, that way we find out if certain people are full of it.

[Twito]

unvote:Twito
Vote:LL

We may as well lynch someone who's been posting a lot, that way we find out if certain people are full of it.

You do realize that you just voted for god, leader of his ppl.