Open 474 - Friends and Enemies - Game Over!

Human Destroyer · Post Post #1225 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 3:49 am

In post 760, NicCage wrote:Ew. We're about to find out, but I think you all just made the wrong choice

Human Destroyer · Post Post #1226 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 3:50 am

^Had GM flipped town, this would be a scumtell

But since GM flipped scum, I don't see any reason for scum to say this. At all.

ISO · Post Post #1227 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 3:54 am

If he were a mason why would he not just hardclaim it at this point?

Jennifer · Post Post #1228 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:32 am

Blargh. I'll feel stupid if that wasn't the intent... I just didn't see how it could be taken any other way. Since it's out there, I guess I'll just ask.

@Cheery Are you claiming mason?

@HD Yeah, I agree with you that Nic's post you quoted was very townish. The cynic in me wonders if he added that to get town cred, but it's not likely I suppose. I've also removed you from my scum list.

NicCage · Post Post #1229 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:08 am

Sorry, I just don't really know where to take this. I haven't had time to read into cheery more. I might be able to do it later today.

CityElectric · Post Post #1230 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:21 am

Votecount 3.2

Cheery Dog (L-1):

ArcAngel9, Docteur Gudsight, borkjerfkin, Human Destroyer

JacobSavage (L-4):

Jennifer

ArcAngel9 (L-4):

Cheery Dog

Not voting (3):

KX, JacobSavage, NicCage

With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch. Day 3 ends in (expired on 2013-03-10 17:00:00)

Klick and NicCage have been prodded.

Docteur Gudsight · Post Post #1231 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:26 am

In post 1230, CityElectric wrote:
Klick (...) have been prodded.

I'm afraid dead people are allowed to lurk >.>

NicCage · Post Post #1232 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:31 am

Hi Jacob, who are your scumreads?

JacobSavage · Post Post #1233 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:35 am

In post 1215, JacobSavage wrote:ArcAngel9 (If Docteur doesn't flip scum)
KX
Docteur Gudsight (If Arc doesn't flip scum)
NicCage

Anyone not on this list.

NicCage · Post Post #1234 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:40 am

Ok. Why do you think Docteur flipping scum would make AA9 not town?
Do you suspect everyone not on that list equally?

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #1235 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:53 am

In post 1224, Jennifer wrote:@AA9 Because he soft-claimed mason.
@HD Yes please.

I don't think he is in a situation to soft claim.. he is at L-1 and i don't feel he acted any where close to town and forgoet about mason

In post 1226, Human Destroyer wrote:^Had GM flipped town, this would be a scumtell

But since GM flipped scum, I don't see any reason for scum to say this. At all.

HD, i recall correctly, you said something stopping you considering jacob as scum what is it?

Human Destroyer · Post Post #1236 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:54 am

In post 429, JacobSavage wrote:Yes obviously, you should know.

But seriously I kind of forgot that Goodmorning was in the game...

^Townslip, scum wouldn't forget their partners

CityElectric · Post Post #1237 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:31 am

In post 1231, Docteur Gudsight wrote:
In post 1230, CityElectric wrote:
Klick (...) have been prodded.

I'm afraid dead people are allowed to lurk >.>

I knew something was off...

Cheery Dog · Post Post #1238 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:53 am

In post 1227, borkjerfkin wrote:If he were a mason why would he not just hardclaim it at this point?

I only ever hard claim stuff with intents to hammer.
I'm not confirming or denying any possible role hints.

JacobSavage · Post Post #1239 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:55 am

In post 1234, NicCage wrote:Ok. Why do you think Docteur flipping scum would make AA9 not town?
Do you suspect everyone not on that list equally?

1.

In post 1134, JacobSavage wrote:It's tenuous at best, but basically your dithering on which one to hammer could be concieved as you attempting to look town when you don't hammer your scum buddy.

But this should only be considered
IF
one of you two flips scum.

2. No, I'm just pretty sure scum isn't in that list. Obviously there's going to be different levels of suspection. I kind of think HD, and Jenny are the more townies, leaving Bork and CD (probably biggest suspect, not seeing this soft-claiming mason thing at all...)

P-EDIT:

Intent to Hammer

, good enough?

Jennifer · Post Post #1240 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:30 am

@Jacob I'll point out what I noticed once we hear from Cheery.

Cheery Dog · Post Post #1241 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:43 pm

In post 1239, JacobSavage wrote:P-EDIT: Intent to Hammer, good enough?

Good enough to change my vote to you for wanting to confirm who you're killing tonight.

VOTE: JACOB

Which you now have, as it was indeed a softclaim as I am a Mason.

(the softclaim Jennifer presumably noticed)

In post 1220, Cheery Dog wrote:I also have no need to hunt masons

KX · Post Post #1242 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:46 pm

This game . . . going to make a quite sizable post pretty soon, but my initial thoughts are that this situation seems to be extremely confused and disordered, and that the Cheery situation seems to be something blown completely out of proportion. I believe everybody should take a step back and look at the game from a large scale picture, begging to end, not just in the moment.

KX · Post Post #1243 (ISO) » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:24 am

I'll post everything I've thought of from reading stuff over later, but for now one quick thing. Read HD's #776 compared to him now. Wtf is all I can say.

Yeah, that's kinda pathetic considering all I read over, but it's 3:24, so you'll all have to wait.

Human Destroyer · Post Post #1244 (ISO) » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:25 am

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Docteur

JacobSavage · Post Post #1245 (ISO) » Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:14 am

In post 1241, Cheery Dog wrote:
In post 1239, JacobSavage wrote:P-EDIT: Intent to Hammer, good enough?

Good enough to change my vote to you for wanting to confirm who you're killing tonight.

VOTE: JACOB

Which you now have, as it was indeed a softclaim as I am a Mason.

(the softclaim Jennifer presumably noticed)

In post 1220, Cheery Dog wrote:I also have no need to hunt masons

That's precisely the reason why, not that I was fed up with the pussy footing around that Jenifer was suggesting...

Cheery Dog · Post Post #1246 (ISO) » Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:44 am

You were not seeing the soft claim, and p-edited an intent when I refused to claim outright.

I therefore don't believe that was really serious, and the fact I already jade a scum read on you just add to why you might have wanted to have me claim, I only bothered because jennifer had put attention to the soft claim already.

ISO · Post Post #1247 (ISO) » Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:55 am

VOTE: Doc

In post 1246, Cheery Dog wrote:You were not seeing the soft claim, and p-edited an intent when I refused to claim outright.

I therefore don't believe that was really serious, and the fact I already jade a scum read on you just add to why you might have wanted to have me claim, I only bothered because jennifer had put attention to the soft claim already.

Let's explore this a little because I'm having trouble seeing where you're coming from. If Jacob had admitted later to seeing the softclaim at any point (which I didn't see either) and ALSO going to try to force your hardclaim I'd agree with your premise, but as it stands this doesn't really make any sense to me.

Docteur Gudsight · Post Post #1248 (ISO) » Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:49 am

I buy the claim. Cheery never attacked Panzer, and passively defended him at some point.

Unvote, Vote: HD

Back to this one.

JacobSavage · Post Post #1249 (ISO) » Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:00 am

Well I believe it personally, that leaves Bork, HD and Jenny. I'm going to go with Jenny as town (pointing out the soft claim) leaving HD and Bork. Of the two HD is the more viable lynch for now so:
VOTE: HD