It dosn't really mean much at this point, unfortunatly. We've only had one dead scum, so there's probably at least 3-4 more of them left. Which means that if you did block a mafia member one of those nights, the odds are something like 3 to 1 that you wouldn't stop the kill anyway. This is even more true in Mathcam's case, as the mafia usually isn't going to have someone do the kill who's both high-profile and under some suspicion, like Mathcam was, as those are the kinds of people who are most likely to get blocked or tracked. So I don't really think that's any kind of significant evidence in Mathcam's favor.spectrumvoid wrote:I see almost everyone has ignored my 2nd last post. I know it doesn't mean much, but doesn't it mean something?
Pretty much what I said.Save The Dragons wrote:it's not definative. mathcam didn't have to be the one to make the kill, neither did MBL.
I suppose that's right, I forgot we started with a day before the first real scum kill.Yosarian2 wrote:It dosn't really mean much at this point, unfortunatly. We've only had one dead scum, so there's probably at least 3-4 more of them left. Which means that if you did block a mafia member one of those nights, the odds are something like 3 to 1 that you wouldn't stop the kill anyway. This is even more true in Mathcam's case, as the mafia usually isn't going to have someone do the kill who's both high-profile and under some suspicion, like Mathcam was, as those are the kinds of people who are most likely to get blocked or tracked. So I don't really think that's any kind of significant evidence in Mathcam's favor.spectrumvoid wrote:I see almost everyone has ignored my 2nd last post. I know it doesn't mean much, but doesn't it mean something?
