In post 272, N wrote:so I'm trying a new thing
Is the new thing "not scumhunting"?
In post 272, N wrote:so I'm trying a new thing
I'm never scum. You can even check my wiki win stats.In post 276, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Vi, how anti-town is your scum play?
Why is Llamarble giving Johhog a pass forIn post 280, Tierce wrote:Vi,whatcontradiction? Explain it to me like I'm a scatterbrained puppyhalf.
and then voting Wetfox in his next post?"Whoa why did you get a different impression from mine" is town because town expect others to agree with them whereas mafia realize they have a different perspective.
In post 282, Tierce wrote:What do you think is Llamarble's reasoning for voting Deas?
His reasoning was "not enough time for etc.", which is etc. of itself. But but--seriously, look at N. u._.u *whimper*In post 114, Tierce wrote:@Llamarble--why did you completely drop your previous lines of reasoning to vote Deas without commenting on posts made by your "previous" scum suspects?
N is fluffier than me. Such a thing cannot stand.In post 284, Tierce wrote:I mean, I commented on it as well, and I still think it's one of the weirdest things from him:His reasoning was "not enough time for etc.", which is etc. of itself. But but--seriously, look at N. u._.u *whimper*In post 114, Tierce wrote:@Llamarble--why did you completely drop your previous lines of reasoning to vote Deas without commenting on posts made by your "previous" scum suspects?Please?
Do you have something to tell the class, CES?CES 271 wrote:Mind you, I'm not talking about the quirky "emulating Glrok" type of anti-town; I'm talking "let's just pushthis mislynchhard".
So your solution to the Final Problem is "do nothing", and you assume what I want from you isIn post 272, N wrote:I've noticed in quite a few of my games I've alienated people and gotten myself mislynched, so I'm trying a new thing. I'm not sure what you're exactly expecting from me (have you gotten my meta mixed up with someone else's?), but I can go through the whole thread and make snarky comments if you'd like?
In post 161, DeasVail wrote:Penguin, what was your reaction when you saw my first post?
In post 248, Wickedestjr wrote:Can you please elaborate on this (specifically the bolded)? Why do you think an 'abrupt 180' would limit the amount of information that was gained?
In post 177, Llamarble wrote:Penguin, did you realize I was Norlkaz (due to my mispost in this game) before you voted for me?
In post 174, Llamarble wrote:Also I have elaborated on my reasons for voting people rather more than is typical for me early on, including at least one explanation of exactly the question you asked.
In post 126, Llamarble wrote:There is only so much time in a day.
In post 246, N wrote:In post 244, Tammy wrote:In post 243, N wrote:I can understand both the Llama and Johhog wagons, but I dunno - Nacho is always scum.
You say you read ny160b (which some at the end of the game said was underpowered anyway) and still say nacho is always scum?
I mean that's fine for an rvs vote, but 10 pages in?
I should have made that clearer:he's always scum in games with me.
In post 254, Wickedestjr wrote:
I'll admit, I'm struggling to develop many strong reads. And I dislike checking other games (for meta purposes) to develop/strengthen reads in this one, but I might have to do this soon anyway seeing as I'm only somewhat familiar with two or three players here. I'm kinda frustrated/stressed/tired right now so I plan to look a little deeper tomorrow. And I'm hoping to establish more stronger reads asap.
In post 292, Benmage wrote:
In post 254, Wickedestjr wrote:
I'll admit, I'm struggling to develop many strong reads. And I dislike checking other games (for meta purposes) to develop/strengthen reads in this one, but I might have to do this soon anyway seeing as I'm only somewhat familiar with two or three players here. I'm kinda frustrated/stressed/tired right now so I plan to look a little deeper tomorrow. And I'm hoping to establish more stronger reads asap.
Ding Ding Ding, scum found.
In post 295, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:In post 292, Benmage wrote:
In post 254, Wickedestjr wrote:
I'll admit, I'm struggling to develop many strong reads. And I dislike checking other games (for meta purposes) to develop/strengthen reads in this one, but I might have to do this soon anyway seeing as I'm only somewhat familiar with two or three players here. I'm kinda frustrated/stressed/tired right now so I plan to look a little deeper tomorrow. And I'm hoping to establish more stronger reads asap.
Ding Ding Ding, scum found.
How is that not a doubleplusplausible position for someone like wicked to find himself in?
In post 220, Tierce wrote:It's the N and Konowa reads I'm worried about. Your Townreads are lovely and keep 'em coming. I'll be chilling in Paris (literally, the city is COLD in February wtf give me my Mediterranean weather) while you have to churn out content, so etc. (>")>
In post 241, Tammy wrote:Empire your stil voting llamarble? Why not johhog?
In post 248, Wickedestjr wrote:@Empire- you said that you found DeasVail's vote for CTD to be suspicious because it seemed lazy and opportunistic. If DeasVail was scum trying to be lazy and opportunistic, then why did you think he would vote for CTD rather than penguin? I'm especially curious considering penguin had received several votes and none of the votes for penguin in RVS were justified.
In post 272, N wrote:I've noticed in quite a few of my games I've alienated people and gotten myself mislynched, so I'm trying a new thing. I'm not sure what you're exactly expecting from me (have you gotten my meta mixed up with someone else's?), but I can go through the whole thread and make snarky comments if you'd like?
In post 274, Vi wrote:I just did.
I'll freely admit that he's very much like Sherlock in what I hear in the subtext of what he posts, but that contradiction is dubious.
In post 285, Vi wrote:Do you have something to tell the class, CES?CES 271 wrote:Mind you, I'm not talking about the quirky "emulating Glrok" type of anti-town; I'm talking "let's just pushthis mislynchhard".
In post 290, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Empire, can you do a cool little anti-Vi screed?