Deadline is in
zabriel is V/LA until 28th of Feb
In post 1070, Jalyn wrote:
Huh. After a quick check back, I guess I meant infamous in my head because I can't find anyone else mentioning it. And it's awful because, at the very worst, as town you would know that people were setting up a lynch you disagreed with, by definition, if you are town, you don't know when you're lynching town. Basically, it implies knowledge that you wouldn't have unless you're scum - classic slip.
It wasn't the "meta" part that was scummy, it was the defending part.
But then we lose what mollie had to say on the issue. She no longer has to come up with an original reason for something that another player found scummy. Especially when you were clear that you didn't have a town read on her, why not let her answer what the player has to say? Maybe she'll slip. Maybe she'll notice something scummy about the attack that you missed. That's why I keep saying that there are two issues with it.
Except, it's not irrelevant. You're claiming that HD was linking you to set up two mislynches, if it's impossible that he could keep up the link to achieve this, his purpose becomes void.
Your argument has ALWAYS been clear. I'm trying to make clear to you why I completely disagree with it. If you were attacking the argument and saying that arguer was scum for the argument (which isn't how it started) then you would have a point. Does that make my viewpoint clear?
In post 1072, zabriel wrote:Oh sweet god, that damn game is finally over.
Micro 118 for anybody interested in the history between tiger and myself.
I was kind of knocking this idea around and noticed Zab's last vote before DOne was Siv way back here, which he took off without voting anyone new when Siv replaced out. The atmosphere at that time was heavy on a DOne push. I don't really get why Zab didn't vote DOne before now if that's where he was leaning (as town), but I also don't really understand why he wouldn't just go ahead and bus Rach now since he already set up the distancing earlier (as scum).In post 1077, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote: Zabiano Domingo Rodriguez, Rach Buddy No. 1.
In post 1080, Wisdom wrote:In post 1074, mcqueen wrote:Anyone voting non-viable lynches for today, needs to remove their vote. It's getting annoying how people who haven't voted for half the time, come in and join a wagon that isn't happening today.
That is heavily directed at zabriel, along with a few others.
/quote]
You're not getting to decide what lynches happen and which don't. It's entirely possible that someone with 0 votes at the moment might get lynched, if the town feels like it.