In post 82, Human Destroyer wrote:See, the main reason why his whole playstyle so far has been inherent bullshit is that anyone that is going into a game should check the playerlist to see if there's anyone in there that they absolutely refuse to play with based on playstyle.
i actually think it's fun to get in a game with a player i dislike so i can spite them, get them lynched, etc. don't ever try hypothesizing what i think because you're spewing fountains of dogshit right now
In post 82, Human Destroyer wrote:Signing up to a game where the first thing you do is going to be "POLICY POLICY POLICY" is inherently anti-town.
am i being antitown? sure. does it mean i'm scum? by no means.
In post 82, Human Destroyer wrote:Using that logic, I don't think tigerzone would come into a game like that; he would look to be pro-town. Therefore, I think his zab PL is complete fabrication and he's scum.
i actually had zero intentions to look protown because i'm just being reckless. why would i fabricate a PL on zab, there's literally no motivation for either alignment to put himself in the spotlight looking for all the world antitown
how is not plausible as an outsider to assume it was a reaction test given the way you reacted? you made a huge ass deal out of it, even somehow arriving at the conclusion that i'm scum for it.
In post 92, Human Destroyer wrote:His insistence on tunneling someone who is a pretty easy lynch before the game has even fully started is troubling
you said it yourself, it's intent that counts, and my intentions didn't include a single thing about zab being an easy lynch. i just wanted him to die solely because of the way he plays.
In post 121, zabriel wrote:You know exactly why my vote went on in the first place. Given what I know of his play I know that I'm not going to be able to tell the difference between town and scum tiger. I'm going to want this all game, so until he's out of this game one way or another I'm going to keep coming back to it.
what do you think of this HD? he's parking his vote on me, please go ahead and reprimand zabriel for being antitown
In post 123, Mitillos wrote:Because that seems like a horribly convenient thing for them to say, to not participate in scumhunting and bus each other at the same time. Have you two done the same thing before in a previous game? That is, each of you attacking the other for "knowing in advance they'll be anti-town"
no, this is our second game together. our first game i replaced into
hd's escalation of the whole policy lynch thing to frame me as scum has a pretty retarded basis, i find it ironic that he's telling wisdom that he's tunneling
