NY 162: A Week at the Theatres (Game Over)

[roflcopter]

ftr no i will not be reading most of day one and no that doesn't mean i am not scumhunting. everyone who keeps filling half their posts with whiny shit about the people not reading can start helping solve the problem by shutting up unless they have something actually important to say.

[MrZepher]

So you're actively choosing to not do anything inherently helpful?
k.

So because I put silly flavor around my question it makes it any less valid?
You're avoiding the topic. Why?

[wind-up]

Zepher might be town actually dear god.

Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Indeed.

ActionDan might be mafia.

I agree.


I also don't think anything dramonic's done has been very good; his posting seems more in the vein of 'you're anti-town' or 'you're bad' instead of 'you're scummy', and that pings my radar more than Zepher's recent activity.

VOTE: dramonic

But Zepher/Go aren't scummy, they're bad/anti-town. I call em what they are, sorry that pings your radar mate?

Ah, so information instead of analysis on top of lack of scumhunting.

Let's lynch dramonic.

[dramonic]

until then my read on him is SIR CYANIDE.

Interesting. You really think so?

Well, you haven't ragequit yet, but otherwise yes!

keep wondering zepher

I'm starting to hope you get vig'd instead of me.

not misrepping

so is the dramonic or the zepher lynch the one for today? I'll vote either

God I dont even care anymore lets just lynch one.

Look at that protown attitude

no wonder no one wants to catch up in this game

lets just lynch zepher and hope some of the more annoying people get killed overnight

Zepher's gonna flip town.
Do not pass Go, do not collect 200$

a question predicated on being out of "morbid curiosity." your goal is to cause a flame war (for example, this most recent post where you bait me by calling my reads and posts "shitty") or something of the like to fill the thread with more garbage that distracts from you getting lynched.

Zepher might be town actually dear god.

Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Indeed.

ActionDan might be mafia.

I agree.


I also don't think anything dramonic's done has been very good; his posting seems more in the vein of 'you're anti-town' or 'you're bad' instead of 'you're scummy', and that pings my radar more than Zepher's recent activity.

VOTE: dramonic

But Zepher/Go aren't scummy, they're bad/anti-town. I call em what they are, sorry that pings your radar mate?

Ah, so information instead of analysis on top of lack of scumhunting.

Let's lynch dramonic.

My vote is on someone I believe to be scum, I've given my reasons, and furthermore accusing me of IIoA because I refuse to call someone I dont think is scum scum is absolutely BS. Are you CERTAIN you're a PGO?

So far, if Dramonic should flip scum:

Mr. Zepher looks bad.
Konowa looks bad.
Go looks real good.
Most players suspicions of Mr. Zepher look real good. So I won't list all the players beyond that. He'd pretty much be Day 2's lynch guaranteed.

If Dramonic flips town.
Go looks horrible.
I even would look horrible for going along with it.
Suspicions of Greygnarl and Zoneace go through the roof (at least for me)
Mr. Zepher looks good.
Konowa looks good.

This is a very

very

scummy line of reasoning. You can't draw association tells like that out of your ass, especially when a player hasn't posted any form of content. That's like me pulling a list and saying who is scum with kdowns. Trying to line up lynches based on one's opinion on the absence of a player for justified (or not, pov) reasons is just...
dont do that.
Someone asked me for this I believe?

[dramonic]

@Rofl: It's still a valid question. Who do you want vigged, besides most of this playerlist?

[Konowa]

Weekend work ends tonight. I'll read what I've missed and see if there is anything to respond to.

[wind-up]

Zepher might be town actually dear god.

Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Indeed.

ActionDan might be mafia.

I agree.


I also don't think anything dramonic's done has been very good; his posting seems more in the vein of 'you're anti-town' or 'you're bad' instead of 'you're scummy', and that pings my radar more than Zepher's recent activity.

VOTE: dramonic

But Zepher/Go aren't scummy, they're bad/anti-town. I call em what they are, sorry that pings your radar mate?

Ah, so information instead of analysis on top of lack of scumhunting.

Let's lynch dramonic.

My vote is on someone I believe to be scum, I've given my reasons, and furthermore accusing me of IIoA because I refuse to call someone I dont think is scum scum is absolutely BS. Are you CERTAIN you're a PGO?

Uh, in what possible world could you think I meant that.

You are calling people out for being bad or anti-town but not actually making judgments on their alignment. That's unproductive, and it falls under information instead of analysis. I'm not asking you to call them scum, I'm asking you to state what you think them being bad or anti-town means.

And yes, I am sure I am a PGO. Great question.

[Nobody Special]

I think we should lynch you, simply for being a PGO.

What do you think of that?

[Go]

Vote: Nobody Special

This game is driving me insane.

[wind-up]

I think we should lynch you, simply for being a PGO.

What do you think of that?

I think you don't actually think that and are saying it for some reason unbeknownst to everyone but you.

[Go]

No, pretty sure he actually thinks that.

[wind-up]

Oh. That's awkward then.

Why don't you vote for dramonic, Go? It's a good lynch.

[Go]

I'll vote for anyone at this point. Reading this game is just making me want to bash my brains in. None of these lynches are going anywhere. Its going to have to come down to the deadline, calling it now.

[Smashbard]

TheTrollie: I'll be honest, I refuse to read anything you post as a counter point within quotations. You never did any of that in the Newbie Game we played together and Nachomamma thought you were guaranteed town. This vast change of playstyle makes me feel like you are scum trying to make your counter points as fluffy, hard to read and wordy as possible to make it seem like you are contributing when your scumhunting is a lot worse than it was in the Newbie Game we shared.

When it comes to my "Over explanation of my question" I was trying to be as transparent with Dramonic as possible because his recent posting is satisfying my demand that he remains active and engaged. My vote on him at this point is really only a place marker until I figure out who better deserves my vote. I figure it's prudent to actively engage whoever directly accuses me of scumminess so that I get a better idea of where they are coming from, and possibly be able to show them that their vote is misplaced with my complete transparency.

I think it's better that way, rather than doing what everyone else in the game is doing and just allowing other people to jump to their defense. Hence why I don't trust Zepher & Go backing me up. Nobody should be 100% confident that I am town unless they have a way to know otherwise. I.E. Scum.

[Smashbard]

EBWOP: I refuse to read anything you post as a counter point within quotations that you have quoted. Aint nobody got time for that.

[ZONEACE]

TheTrollie: I'll be honest, I refuse to read anything you post as a counter point within quotations. You never did any of that in the Newbie Game we played together and Nachomamma thought you were guaranteed town. This vast change of playstyle makes me feel like you are scum trying to make your counter points as fluffy, hard to read and wordy as possible to make it seem like you are contributing when your scumhunting is a lot worse than it was in the Newbie Game we shared.

this is absolutely, unforgivably dumb (or stubborn, or both).

[Smashbard]

I'll take stubbornly dumb. That's a lot better than the words I can think of for half the players in this game thus far.

[Bacde]

hey is dramonic lynched yet

[Go]

can we get a vc up in hurr

[TheTrollie]

ill have to meta zepher...I haven't really been reading this tread as carefully as I should be, but I have a feeling that metaing zepher will probably lead me to think hes town since thats what ppl who know his meta seem to claim.

Smash didn't really answer my whole argument, but i have a gut town read on him because of that. he didnt seem to care enough about explaining himself or proving alternate motivation.

I'll do work on this game soon. This week is gonna be hectic for me, so I might not be on here as much as i want to be.

[Smashbard]

Unvote.

Consider me confused. The only case I really had on Dramonic was that he was lying about crippling computer issues as an excuse to not have to contribute. Since he's started posting on his phone I haven't seen anything scummy that he's done beyond his blatant OMGUS of my vote on him.

Are there other reasons someone can paraphrase for me as to why he's obviously scum?

[Bacde]

mostly the lying thing

[PeregrineV]

can we get a vc up in hurr

Caught up, but let's start with seconding this.

@Producer-1 vc per page or real day, please

I agree with case on Dram, and feel that he's been here long enough to know that his claim in this thread would be checked out, so saying the truth(?-407) prior to being called out on it is preferable. But, if he continues his activity in this caught up game, I'd rather lynch elsewhere.

As to where...well, I have to look at the wagons and the voters on them, since I detect a distinct lack of real reasons. And you guys are all new to me, so kind of blur together at this point (no offense).

[Bacde]

Unvote

Vote: ZONEACE

I suddenly remembered this vote

[dramonic]

hey wind-up, what's your read on everyone?
oh, and if you say null once that's lynch worthy. duh
ive already stated my read on zepher and go, if all you want to do this game is sit on your pgo claim with your hands up your ass suit yourself, but stop pretending you have a sliver of an idea of what's going on. Otherwise start reading what people are posting.

bacde, you planning to contribute or are you content with active lurking?

fucking christ this game.

EDIT: im not voting you for the vote on me, im voting you for the poor attempt at lining up lynches.
im thinking you might just be miguided though at this point.

unvote

EDIT: beating the dead horse when its already turned to glue. This bs case is not getting old.

EDIT:...
ok can we just lynch this already?

vote: bacde