Here's a post I made when I was unable to post able to log in:
Contrary to popular belief and expectation, I have read all the posts. To prove it, I'll do a PBPA of every post by Coron regarding mathcam from around page 30+.
1. He asks cam to be more specific on why BJ was lynched. No mention of suspicion on cam.
2. He says he doesn't understand cam's argument. Also no mention of suspicion.
3. Refer to MoS's post on the reasons why this isn't good:
Mastermind of Sin wrote:TheCesspit wrote:Coron wrote:Alright, we just went back to the: not a good reason stage.
Outing more masons than will confirm you masons=bad idea unless there is only one known mason alive.
I'm fine with his play.
I'm not. He could have stated 'I can talk to certain people at night'. This would have been the truth and not outing anyone.
He didn't. I don't like the way he played, and think he could have claimed smarter. It looked like a good lynch to me. It wasn't, but I wasn't alone.
Now, why are you questioning the play yesterday? Why not question it then, rather than today now it's over and it's easier to second guess? You've been quiet and called on it, I reckon, and trying to youself look good. For what end, I don't know.
I need to jog the grey cells, but wasn't there a long finger of suspicion over mathcam ealry on Day 2 as well?
Coron didn't post from Jul 31 until Sept. 16 or so. Up until his return for lurkerland, his biggest contribution seems to have been clamoring for Spamwise to get lynched, who was replaced by mathcam and still seems to be one of his top suspects. But that's another debate. He clearly wasn't here for the last day, so he couldn't have posted when the wagon was actually happening. Now, whether he lurked purposefully or on accident, that's something we'll have to determine.
4. Coron's response: he swears he was suspicious of cam before.
5. He then accuses cam of concocting this reasoning, without explaining why, other than saying cam is usually less suspicious of people who have a proven role.
6. Next post: Thinks cam is scum. No reason given.
7. He goes off on a tangent for a while on Ibby.
Coron posted a list.
Coron wrote:Mathcam- recently has faded to the background, has keep posting but nothing of consequence for almost as long as I have been not posting.
8.
Coron wrote:I don't remember exactly what happened but I remember a lot of people were voting Mathcam and he was very suspicious.
Vote: Mathcam
Unless you want to talk about earlier day stuff, I can't find a single reason for Coron finding cam suspicious. He says cam has faded to the background, but he himself is guilty of doing that by not being active. (as I am). This argument does not specifically apply to only cam.
So... coron, what's your reason for voting cam again?
Blank.
